Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox and Reuters: White House set to release the PDB from Aug '01 anytime now..
Fox

Posted on 04/10/2004 2:09:30 PM PDT by Dog

Breaking now.....it will be released in a pdf file.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911memo; atheatrenearyou; benveniste; benvinistelied; bush43; bushisnottoast; bushistoast; bushvindicated; demslostagain; doa; gorelick; pdb; ricevindicated
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 681-699 next last
To: Howlin; Dog
I called CNN & got a comment line.
Did I ever rip them one about the
abjectly false, biased hit piece
delivered by William Schneider.
The phone line & recorder are just
about smokin' right now.
621 posted on 04/10/2004 4:44:50 PM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
What annoys me is that someone is wasting prescious resources for this witchhunt while there is a war going on, when those resources should be pointed to the terrorists currently here.
622 posted on 04/10/2004 4:44:51 PM PDT by Maigrey (Knuckle Dragging Neanderthals don't do Dishes! - WillieRoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
I am setting my VCR for 1 AM CDT to tape a copy of Beltway Boys.
623 posted on 04/10/2004 4:46:12 PM PDT by mathluv (Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey
Hear, hear!!!
624 posted on 04/10/2004 4:47:45 PM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
That may be true and I hope and pray that when he is old enough, Elian will once again escape that rathole and return to this country and freedom.
625 posted on 04/10/2004 4:48:26 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
MSNBC talking about how Kerrey said Dr. Rice's interpretation of this memo was "way off".

Kerrey is intellectually way off, which begs the question, Why is he on this commission?

Did you catch David Gregory reporting from Crawford? He was salivating over this document.

Gregory said that Rice "admitted" there were govt structural problems (implying problems created by Bush admin). He went on to say that CIA and FBI couldn't communicate and coordinate with one another because of Bush admin!!

Apparently Gregory doesn't know the tortured history of our intelligence and law enforcement communities and how they have been completely emasculated by the left.

626 posted on 04/10/2004 4:49:16 PM PDT by Spotsy (Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Yes, she is impressive. Transcript
627 posted on 04/10/2004 4:49:42 PM PDT by Darlin' ("I will not forget this wound to my country." President George W Bush, 20 Sept 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 605 | View Replies]

To: mathluv
I would tape it too if I could figure out how to work my VCR...got to get TIVO I guess.
628 posted on 04/10/2004 4:50:24 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies]

To: Darlin'
Commissioner Ben-Veniste.

BEN-VENISTE: Good morning, Dr. Rice.

RICE: Good morning.

BEN-VENISTE: Nice to see you again.

RICE: Nice to see you.

BEN-VENISTE: I want to ask you some questions about the August 6, 2001, PDB. We had been advised in writing by CIA on March 19, 2004, that the August 6th PDB was prepared and self-generated by a CIA employee. Following Director Tenet's testimony on March 26th before us, the CIA clarified its version of events, saying that questions by the president prompted them to prepare the August 6th PDB.

Now, you have said to us in our meeting together earlier in February, that the president directed the CIA to prepare the August 6th PDB.

The extraordinary high terrorist attack threat level in the summer of 2001 is well-documented. And Richard Clarke's testimony about the possibility of an attack against the United States homeland was repeatedly discussed from May to August within the intelligence community, and that is well-documented.

You acknowledged to us in your interview of February 7, 2004, that Richard Clarke told you that al-Qaida cells were in the United States.

BEN-VENISTE: Did you tell the president, at any time prior to August 6th, of the existence of al-Qaida cells in the United States?

RICE: First, let me just make certain ...

BEN-VENISTE: If you could just answer that question, because I only have a very limited ...

RICE: I understand, Commissioner, but it's important ...

BEN-VENISTE: Did you tell the president ...

RICE: ... that I also address ...

(APPLAUSE)

It's also important that, Commissioner, that I address the other issues that you have raised. So I will do it quickly, but if you'll just give me a moment.

BEN-VENISTE: Well, my only question to you is whether you ...

RICE: I understand, Commissioner, but I will ...

BEN-VENISTE: ... told the president.

RICE: If you'll just give me a moment, I will address fully the questions that you've asked.

First of all, yes, the August 6th PDB was in response to questions of the president _ and that since he asked that this be done. It was not a particular threat report. And there was historical information in there about various aspects of al-Qaida's operations.

Dick Clarke had told me, I think in a memorandum _ I remember it as being only a line or two _ that there were al-Qaida cells in the United States.

Now, the question is, what did we need to do about that?

And I also understood that that was what the FBI was doing, that the FBI was pursuing these al-Qaida cells. I believe in the August 6th memorandum it says that there were 70 full field investigations under way of these cells. And so there was no recommendation that we do something about this; the FBI was pursuing it.

I really don't remember, Commissioner, whether I discussed this with the president.

BEN-VENISTE: Thank you.

RICE: I remember very well that the president was aware that there were issues inside the United States. He talked to people about this. But I don't remember the al-Qaida cells as being something that we were told we needed to do something about.

BEN-VENISTE: Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6th PDB warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB?

RICE: I believe the title was, Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States.

Now, the ...

BEN-VENISTE: Thank you.

RICE: No, Mr. Ben-Veniste ...

BEN-VENISTE: I will get into the ...

RICE: I would like to finish my point here.

BEN-VENISTE: I didn't know there was a point.

RICE: Given that _ you asked me whether or not it warned of attacks.

BEN-VENISTE: I asked you what the title was.

RICE: You said, did it not warn of attacks. It did not warn of attacks inside the United States. It was historical information based on old reporting. There was no new threat information. And it did not, in fact, warn of any coming attacks inside the United States.

BEN-VENISTE: Now, you knew by August 2001 of al-Qaida involvement in the first World Trade Center bombing, is that correct?

You knew that in 1999, late '99, in the millennium threat period, that we had thwarted an al-Qaida attempt to blow up Los Angeles International Airport and thwarted cells operating in Brooklyn, New York, and Boston, Massachusetts.

As of the August 6th briefing, you learned that al-Qaida members have resided or traveled to the United States for years and maintained a support system in the United States.

And you learned that FBI information since the 1998 blind sheik warning of hijackings to free the blind sheik indicated a pattern of suspicious activity in the country up until August 6th consistent with preparation for hijackings. Isn't that so?

RICE: Do you have other questions that you want me to answer as a part of the sequence?

BEN-VENISTE: Well, did you not _ you have indicated here that this was some historical document. And I am asking you whether it is not the case that you learned in the PDB memo of August 6th that the FBI was saying that it had information suggesting that preparations _ not historically, but ongoing, along with these numerous full field investigations against al-Qaida cells, that preparations were being made consistent with hijackings within the United States?

RICE: What the August 6th PDB said, and perhaps I should read it to you...

BEN-VENISTE: We would be happy to have it declassified in full at this time, including its title.

(APPLAUSE)

RICE: I believe, Mr. Ben-Veniste, that you've had access to this PDB. But let me just...

BEN-VENISTE: But we have not had it declassified so that it can be shown publicly, as you know.

RICE: I believe you've had access to this PDB _ exceptional access. But let me address your question.

BEN-VENISTE: Nor could we, prior to today, reveal the title of that PDB.

RICE: May I address the question, sir?

The fact is that this August 6th PDB was in response to the president's questions about whether or not something might happen or something might be planned by al-Qaida inside the United States. He asked because all of the threat reporting or the threat reporting that was actionable was about the threats abroad, not about the United States.

This particular PDB had a long section on what bin Laden had wanted to do _ speculative, much of it _ in '97, '98; that he had, in fact, liked the results of the 1993 bombing.

RICE: It had a number of discussions of _ it had a discussion of whether or not they might use hijacking to try and free a prisoner who was being held in the United States _ Ressam. It reported that the FBI had full field investigations under way.

And we checked on the issue of whether or not there was something going on with surveillance of buildings, and we were told, I believe, that the issue was the courthouse in which this might take place.

Commissioner, this was not a warning. This was a historic memo -- historical memo prepared by the agency because the president was asking questions about what we knew about the inside.

BEN-VENISTE: Well, if you are willing ...

RICE: Now, we had already taken ...

BEN-VENISTE: If you are willing to declassify that document, then others can make up their minds about it.

Let me ask you a general matter, beyond the fact that this memorandum provided information, not speculative, but based on intelligence information, that bin Laden had threatened to attack the United States and specifically Washington, D.C.

There was nothing reassuring, was there, in that PDB?

RICE: Certainly not. There was nothing reassuring.

But I can also tell you that there was nothing in this memo that suggested that an attack was coming on New York or Washington, D.C. There was nothing in this memo as to time, place, how or where. This was not a threat report to the president or a threat report to me.

BEN-VENISTE: We agree that there were no specifics. Let me move on, if I may.

RICE: There were no specifics, and, in fact, the country had already taken steps through the FAA to warn of potential hijackings. The country had already taken steps through the FBI to task their 56 field offices to increase their activity. The country had taken the steps that it could given that there was no threat reporting about what might happen inside the United States.

BEN-VENISTE: We have explored that and we will continue to with respect to the muscularity and the specifics of those efforts.

The president was in Crawford, Texas, at the time he received the PDB, you were not with him, correct?

RICE: That is correct.

BEN-VENISTE: Now, was the president, in words or substance, alarmed or in any way motivated to take any action, such as meeting with the director of the FBI, meeting with the attorney general, as a result of receiving the information contained in the PDB?

RICE: I want to repeat that when this document was presented, it was presented as, yes, there were some frightening things _ and by the way, I was not at Crawford, but the president and I were in contact and I might have even been, though I can't remember, with him by video link during that time.

The president was told this is historical information. I'm told he was told this is historical information and there was nothing actionable in this. The president knew that the FBI was pursuing this issue. The president knew that the director of central intelligence was pursuing this issue. And there was no new threat information in this document to pursue.

BEN-VENISTE: Final question, because my time has almost expired.

Do you believe that, had the president taken action to issue a directive to the director of CIA to ensure that the FBI had pulsed the agency, to make sure that any information which we know now had been collected was transmitted to the director, that the president might have been able to receive information from CIA with respect to the fact that two al-Qaida operatives who took part in the 9-11 catastrophe were in the United States _ Alhazmi and Almidhar; and that Moussaoui, who Dick Clarke was never even made aware of, who had jihadist connections, who the FBI had arrested, and who had been in a flight school in Minnesota trying to learn the avionics of a commercial jetliner despite the fact that he had no training previously, had no explanation for the funds in his bank account, and no explanation for why he was in the United States _ would that have possibly, in your view, in hindsight, made a difference in the ability to collect this information, shake the trees, as Richard Clarke had said, and possibly, possibly interrupt the plotters?

RICE: My view, Commissioner Ben-Veniste, as I said to Chairman Kean, is that, first of all, the director of central intelligence and the director of the FBI, given the level of threat, were doing what they thought they could do to deal with the threat that we faced.

There was no threat reporting of any substance about an attack coming in the United States.

RICE: And the director of the FBI and the director of the CIA, had they received information, I am quite certain _ given that the director of the CIA met frequently face to face with the president of the United States _ that he would have made that available to the president or to me.

I do not believe that it is a good analysis to go back and assume that somehow maybe we would have gotten lucky by, quote, shaking the trees. Dick Clarke was shaking the trees, director of central intelligence was shaking the trees, director of the FBI was shaking the trees. We had a structural problem in the United States.

BEN-VENISTE: Did the president meet with the director of the FBI?

RICE: We had a structural problem in the United States, and that structural problem was that we did not share domestic and foreign intelligence in a way to make a product for policymakers, for good reasons _ for legal reasons, for cultural reasons _ a product that people could depend upon.

BEN-VENISTE: Did the president meet with the director of ...

KEAN: Commissioner, we got to move on ...

BEN-VENISTE: ... the FBI between August 6th and September 11th?

KEAN: ... to Commissioner Fielding.

RICE: I will have to get back to you on that. I am not certain.

~end~

629 posted on 04/10/2004 4:50:30 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Thank you for the reminder. I was trying to recall the really horrible thing that the Clinton crowd had done on Easter Saturday, but I could not name it.

I still cannot listen to or look at the lawyer Kendall Coffey who was supposedly, interceding for the family, when that raid took place.

I believe that he was complicit in the snatch, or compromised by Janet Reno in some way.

630 posted on 04/10/2004 4:51:18 PM PDT by maica (World Peace starts with W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Yes, thanks so much, but I have it.... I'd already posted excerpts to Mo1 and the link to the entire transcript to jorge up thread.
632 posted on 04/10/2004 4:54:25 PM PDT by Darlin' ("I will not forget this wound to my country." President George W Bush, 20 Sept 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
I certainly didn't see anybody celebrating here.
633 posted on 04/10/2004 4:54:34 PM PDT by Howlin ((This space for rent!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 613 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Rice stated emphatically on Thursday she did not see any such reports about al-Qaeda using a plane as a weapon until after Sept. 11, suggesting the intelligence may have reached someone lower in the White House.

Richard Clarke?

634 posted on 04/10/2004 4:55:30 PM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: maica; OldFriend
On another Easter Sunday, Clinton had a visit with Monica in the Oval Office.
635 posted on 04/10/2004 4:55:57 PM PDT by Howlin ((This space for rent!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies]

To: Darlin'
It was for the entire thread....should have put "all" in the "to" line.
636 posted on 04/10/2004 4:56:20 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
David Gregory, the DNC Pimp, is still trying to put lipstick on the pig on MSNBC.

Very apt description.

637 posted on 04/10/2004 4:56:49 PM PDT by Spotsy (Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: Darlin'
Its the political equavilent of a perp hiring Johnny Cochran...

LOL!

Veniste reminds me of the guy who knocks on your door in the old gangster movies and says "hey we got some insurance we wancha to buy."

Bottom line is this commission has now publicly revealed more than their partisanship, they've revealed they mishandle evidence by not doing thorough research. Think about all of the FR threads today from Kerrey not knowing of the Clinton audio tape about Bin Laden to the Woodward article in 2000 about this very pdb file. So much for evidential research and search for truth.
638 posted on 04/10/2004 4:57:07 PM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Sorry, just my interpretation.

LOL! I remember the i42 walking out of church that morning with the Bible under his arm.

639 posted on 04/10/2004 4:58:43 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
Do you have a link to where Ari revealed the title of the PDB in 2002?

It's in this May 2002 article co-written by Bob Woodward. Notice the "bombshell" title of the PDB that Ben Veniste claimed was secret until last Thursday was write there on page one of the Washington Post on May 19, 2002:

Aug. Memo Focused On Attacks in U.S. Lack of Fresh Information Frustrated Bush (2002/PDB)

640 posted on 04/10/2004 4:59:38 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 681-699 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson