[Polycarp IV]

Add A Comment

Someone should forward this thread to Cardinal George! Let him know that faithful Catholics are desperate for justice! Maybe we should quit supporting the Bishops' diocesan lenten appeals and capital campaigns until they all follow Archbishop Burke's lead.

Posted by: misfit Today 10:24 AM EST

Many of us have sentenced Cardinal Francis George of Chicago to Hades and other distinguished leaders of the RC Church in the US but I suggest that this assignment is beyond our jurisdiction. More profitable would be an attempt to understand the positions of these gifted and devoted men of the Church and to pray they in turn seek the guidance of the Holy Spirit in their direction of the Church.

Posted by: Peter-Paul Today 6:19 AM EST

This not a simple issue. We are not to receive the Eucharist when in the state of mortal sin. To committ a mortal sin there must be three conditions present: (1) the matter must be grave, (2) there must be sufficient reflection on the evil one is contemptlating, and (3) there must be full consent of the will. Can we say that today's Catholics really understand this? There has been so much talk about one's own conscience and so much relativism. We need to reeducate the Church.

Posted by: ILM Today 6:12 AM EST

OUTRAGE!!! This from a Cardinal, a position that helps select our Popes?? He needs to wait for a recommendation from a task force set up by the Catholic Bishops?? What absolute garbage! What about what the Faith has stood for dear Cardinal? What about the recommendation from almost 2000 years of the Church? This man should preach from Hell because this is where he is directing individuals. What absolute cowardiness, what disgusting moral and ethical failure. Christ and Mary have mercy.

Posted by: Athanasius Today 12:36 AM EST

There would be only one response to me, as an individual Catholic, if I wanted to openly cause scandal by supporting abortion upon demand. I am sure the Bishop would have no difficulty in telling me that the pro-life position is not optional for Catholics who wish to be in good standing with the Catholic Church and worthily receive the Holy Eucharist. I see no difference just because Sen. Kerry is a politician. His immortal soul doesn't know the difference because there is none.

Posted by: Tudy Apr. 09, 2004 11:35 PM EST

Dear Cardinal, The proper response is not to give these public Catholic politicians, who support abortion, homosexuality, and euthanasia, Holy Communion. In order to be in Communion with the Catholic Church you must follow, Sacred Tradition, Sacred Scripture, and the Magisterium (all three, not one, or two, but All Three. John Kerry strikes out on all three. Cardinal you should turn your Red Cap in, if you have to form a task force, to tell a fallen-away Catholic theTruth.

Posted by: Ross Dee Apr. 09, 2004 11:30 PM EST

Prochoice Catholic politicians (around 500 in the US) receiving Holy Communion with the approval of Church leadership is creating scandal. It is leading people into sin because the message is that abortion is "no big deal." Women trying to decide on whether or not to have an abortion are going to be nudged toward abortion by this action. Pray that the Vatican and the USCCB's committee will make the right decision.

Posted by: Jim Apr. 09, 2004 10:54 PM EST

Dealing with someone giving public scandal is a prudential matter; as long as they preach clearly, the bishops should get the benefit of the doubt. What difference does it make? It doesn't affect Kerry. No "Catholic" could believe in the Real Presence AND support abortion. So he'd be denied something that is meaningless to him. Query how many people receive communion every Sunday despite being in a state of mortal sin? Which is more important? Would ANY hearts or minds be changed? NO.

Posted by: Raqa Apr. 09, 2004 10:28 PM EST

The Devil has been at work throughout our Roman Catholic Church for some time under the guise of Liberalism. The battle for control rages. If Liberalism is successful, a full schism may be in the offing.As to Cardinal George and his position, I don't have any faith in the AP. Lets look for a more authoritative source. Let's pray the Cardinal doesn't let us down.

Posted by: GITCHEGUME Apr. 09, 2004 10:14 PM EST

to stlouisix re the eucharist..I know where you are coming from however Kerry knows all the rules just like you and I. He is so pompus isn't he? Now for our leaders, they know we know. We have been told just like Kerry. Jesus left his apostles because they would have wanted him to spoon feed them into His Kingdom. It's God's doing to allow this story front page. From all this people are learning again when you can and cannot receive HIM. And that abortion is very seriously wrong Mr Kerry.Danie

Posted by: Danie Apr. 09, 2004 9:40 PM EST

It is time we let our shephards know that we are watching them. It is not enough anymore to just say "oh how awful" when a shepard does not uphold Church teaching. We must say to them in love "ENOUGH". http://www.archdiocese-chgo.org/cardinal/cardinal.shtm

Posted by: bjrcathcon Apr. 09, 2004 9:10 PM EST

Yes, Coco and Captain Cook. A second marriage without a judgement of nullity is adultery, and cannot be changed, as this is verbatum from Jesus Himself. It does mean that one is in grave sin IF all three requirements are in place. And I also wish that the good Cardinal could read the comments here. An article I read recently suggested Kerry will seek a photo op of being refused Communion. Another said...what if he cannot fine anyone to refuse him. Something to think about. God have mercy on us.

Posted by: WISCatholic Apr. 09, 2004 9:07 PM EST

What would the Devil himself do different to wreak havoc and confusion in the Church? Would anyone be inspired to become a Catholic when we have the likes of C. George held out as a "leader"? Nothing will change until these guys are removed...

Posted by: Head Monk Apr. 09, 2004 8:44 PM EST

St Maximus Confessor he is not.

Posted by: Pseudodionysius Apr. 09, 2004 8:35 PM EST

The real shame is the bad example the Cardinal is setting for his brother Bishops. It is a sin to be in the postition that he's in and fail the Church.

Posted by: Thomas2 Apr. 09, 2004 8:21 PM EST

We must all be completely nonplussed. Expect this of European bishops, but American? There is no rationale that can explain Cdls George, McCarrick, Keeler, Eagan, Mahoney, and other bishops! If there is, they better start explaining themselves.The Church in America is coming unglued and they are directly responsible. How can the American Catholic pro-life movement continue effectively with such ambivalence? The scandal is truly profound. I think this is really, really bad. History has few comps.

Posted by: benbernie Apr. 09, 2004 8:21 PM EST

We need new bishops because the majority of them are spineless with, of course some outstanding exceptions. If, if The Cadinal said this, and thats a big if, he then is a member of the majority and that would be a loss and a shame! Jack Gilbert

Posted by: JBG Apr. 09, 2004 8:17 PM EST

The Cardinal is "waiting for recommendations from a task force..." Hmmm. It seems to me that Our Lord made all the 'recommendations' any shepherd needs some 2000+ years ago. What am I missing? More improtantly, what is Cradinal George missing...?

Posted by: GOR Apr. 09, 2004 7:55 PM EST

A second comment re 'c'ardinal George. I wish the comments that I have been reading would be read by the caridinal.

Posted by: Captain Cook Apr. 09, 2004 7:13 PM EST

I recall reading about something Cardinal George said a few years back. When the people complained to him about changes in the liturgy that priests were doing, Cardinal George was purported to have told them to stop whinning. I think it was from a non Cathoic news source. I guess that I am not all that surprised about his lack of courage stance today.

Posted by: Captain Cook Apr. 09, 2004 7:11 PM EST

What about the fact that Kerry divorced and re-married without an annulment? Or is adultery no longer a mortal sin in the United States?

Posted by: Coco Apr. 09, 2004 6:43 PM EST

What a disappointment! I thought Cardinal George was one of the REALLY good bishops.

Posted by: Ann from Ireland Apr. 09, 2004 4:53 PM EST

May the Holy Sprit fall anew upon Cardinal George and his brothers! In the name of Christ I pray.

Posted by: Mauna Kea Apr. 09, 2004 4:29 PM EST

Any Catholic—politician or not—that openly promotes anti-Catholic thought or action is to be publicly rebuked and, if known to the minister, refused Holy Communion. It doesn’t take a task force of bishops to figure that out. “For there will come a time when they will not endure the sound doctrine; but having itching ears, will heap up to themselves teachers according to their own lusts, and will they will turn away their hearing from the truth and turn aside rather to fables.” 2 Tim, 4: 3-4

Posted by: altar boy Apr. 09, 2004 3:46 PM EST

Maybe it's time to see bishops fighting in public. If our house is to be divided, it better be over something important. These questions are that important.

Posted by: Rex Aldrich Apr. 09, 2004 2:35 PM EST

It has finally dawned on me what the problem is with the American Bishops..... The problem is that they are all American Catholics. They reflect rather accurately the makeup of Catholics in this counntry. Bad news for all us CWN readers....we are a tiny minority. I know they should lead us not follow us but that isn't going to happen. We have met the enemy and he is us!

Posted by: Where'sRoger? Apr. 09, 2004 12:26 PM EST

Another "Shepherd" down the tube.

Posted by: kaycee Apr. 09, 2004 11:58 AM EST

Isn't that putting politics above principle, Cardinal?

Posted by: Leo13 Apr. 09, 2004 11:26 AM EST

As long as there are bishops like George and O'Malley who do not have the courage to defend the faith by putting those who are repeatedly guilty of committing public scandal by bastardizing it on notice that they are in danger of eternal perdition for the sake of the souls of all concerned, the status quo where "dissent rules" in the Catholic Church will remain unchanged. Doesn't Rome care about souls going to Heaven instead of hell anymore? Isn't the existence of hell still Catholic dogma?

Posted by: stlouisix Apr. 09, 2004 10:13 AM EST

This is terribly disappointing. Archbishop Burke is courageously offering real leadership as a bishop, and to see him publicly snubbed like this by Cardinal George is not only a betrayl, but a move calculated to foster confusion and even scandal among the flock. Fie on you, Cardinal George. The advice in Mt 18:6 seems especially appropriate here.

Posted by: GrzeszDeL Apr. 09, 2004 10:09 AM EST

[Polycarp IV]

More spineless hierarchs weigh in on the Kerry Kontroversy.

[freeangel]

Let's see--women in the Atlanta area were excluded from the foot washing rituals this week, but slime like kerry can keep recieving sacraments after he endorses abortion and homosexuality because of why?

[Tacis]

Ease up on the Cardinal! He knows that Kerry is lying when he says he supports abortion, just as we all do. Kerry wouldn't have "annuled" the marriage to his first wife and turned his kids into bastards if he didn't follow faithfully the doctrine of his church. The Cardinals know when he SAYS something that seems inconsistant with that doctrine, he really is lying.

[TheBattman]

Why and I not surprised that the Church doesn't have a backbone in this case? The Church has clearly stated several times that it will not allow communion for those who support abortion and a handful of other issues. Yet time and time again, they back down from their position.

What's the term for those who preach one thing, then do another?

leadership

[claudiustg]

He's only following the cardinal principle: never miss a chance to kiss rich and powerful butt.

[Jim Noble]

This actually is quite an interesting problem, and giving communion to Kerry may be more problematic than these bishops suppose.

I'm married to a Roman Catholic, and we go to a Catholic Church.

I don't receive communion, because I'm asked not to (as you all know).

Now, the usual explanation of WHY I'm asked not to is that "we don't share a common faith", and there are various elaborations of this view that are familiar to all.

But what about the fact that I share more, FAR more, in faith than Kerry does with his bishop and the teaching magisterium? It does not seem reasonable that Kerry's (presumably false) profession of "being a Catholic" (whatever he means by that) should count for more than the faith of all other Christians not in communion with Rome but who profess the Creed and who believe in the real presence.

Is it Cardinal George's view that it doesn't matter what you believe, or what you do as long as you call yourself a Catholic?

Would George say, "Well, he's an athiest, but at least he's a Catholic athiest"?

[M-cubed]

He indicated that he is waiting for recommendations from a task force set up by the US bishops' conference to consider that problem.<<< Can we assume that in these wonderful days of "diversity worshipers" that the task force has a majority of Muslim clerics on board?

[don-o]

Who's Freepin' Kerry on Sunday?

[m4629]

Cardinal George reportedly said that he was considering an appropriate response to prominent Catholic political leaders who violate Church teachings on issues such as abortion, homosexuality, and euthanasia. He indicated that he is waiting for recommendations from a task force set up by the US bishops' conference to consider that problem.

Well now let's see, perhaps Jesus should have waited on his rebuke of Mr. Iscariot, while the Jerusalem Better Business Bureau conduct an inquiry to determine whether the transaction between him and Caiaphas was kosher and in compliance with the code of ethics.

These modern day bishops really believe we are too stupid to realize they are hiding behind the Bishops Conference don't they?

[Piquaboy]

It all depends on how much money you donate as to what you can or cannot do.

[Ronaldus Magnus]

Bump.

[OpusatFR]

"Someone should forward this thread to Cardinal George! Let him know that faithful Catholics are desperate for justice!
Maybe we should quit supporting the Bishops' diocesan lenten appeals and capital campaigns until they all follow Archbishop Burke's lead."

Maybe we should calm down and let the Holy Spirit guide this Bishop and Kerry. Kerry does not seen to understand The True Presence not only because of his stance on reproductive choices and fetal cell research, but because he also took Communion in a Protestant Church which belies any belief he has in the Eucharist.

Ultimately, the idea of Kerry receiving the Host after his words and actions this past week will have to be dealt with by the Bishops.

And ultimately, Kerry will have to answer to Someone else.
God is not mocked.

[Arthur McGowan]

No Catholic should give a penny to the Church in any diocese where the bishop has not made an explicit statement that no pro-abortion Catholic should receive Communion. And the bishop should be expected to back up this statement by disciplining priests who violate this policy.

[Cicero]

For what it's worth, Cardinal George "reportedly said" this according to AP. Maybe he did. But maybe he didn't.

I'm not defending him. But he's a bishop with a past record of solid theological orthodoxy trying to cope with a huge mess left to him by Cardinal Bernardin, the single most malign bishop to infest the Catholic Church in America in the past 50 years.

If he thinks it imprudent to speak out on this issue, then I would prefer that he remain silent. The position of the Church is clear.

And with regard to other replies posted here, I don't THINK Kerry has received an annullment. All we know for sure is that he has APPLIED for an annullment, and that his wife refused the invitation from the Boston chancery to oppose the proceedings. That doesn't mean he has received it. If he had, it's hard to imagine he would not have announced the fact publicly, since he is so desperately trying to square himself with Catholic voters.

[cynicom]

The Cardinal got a call from Kerrys Rabbi.

[A.A. Cunningham]

"The floor of hell is paved with the skulls of bishops."
St. Athanasius

[Aquinasfan]

Cardinal Francis George of Chicago has announced that he will not deny the Eucharist to Catholic politicians who support abortion, according to an AP report.

Time to excommunicate Cardinal George. Enough is enough.

[Mo1]

Cardinal George reportedly said that he was considering an appropriate response to prominent Catholic political leaders who violate Church teachings on issues such as abortion, homosexuality, and euthanasia. He indicated that he is waiting for recommendations from a task force set up by the US bishops' conference to consider that problem.

That was the wrong answer to give

[RonDog]

Indexing related threads - for future reference:

Diocese gives nod for Kerry to receive Eucharist
			Posted by delacoert On News/Activism 04/10/2004 10:40:32 AM PDT with 14 comments The Boston Herald ^ | April 10, 2004 | Eric Convey
Chicago cardinal [George] would not withhold Eucharist [Kerry]
			Posted by Polycarp IV On News/Activism 04/10/2004 8:53:44 AM PDT with 63 comments CWNews.com ^ | Apr. 09 | CWNews.com
Diocese gives nod for Kerry to receive Eucharist
			Posted by Fifthmark On Religion 04/10/2004 8:39:21 AM PDT with 6 comments The Boston Herald ^ | April 10, 2004 | Eric Convey
Chicago Cardinal would not withhold Eucharist
			Posted by Canticle_of_Deborah On Religion 04/09/2004 4:15:11 PM PDT with 16 comments CWNews ^ | April 9, 2003
Bishop Bruskewitz will deny Kerry the Eucharist
			Posted by johnb2004 On Religion 04/07/2004 10:39:21 AM PDT with 33 comments www.renewamerica.us ^ | April 6, 2004 | Barbara Kralis

[fella]

So the pedifile protecting heirarchs are sideing with Kerry.