Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek piece 'doesn't add up' [Scam at Newsweek]
Washington Times ^ | Apr 10, 2004 | editorial

Posted on 04/10/2004 1:20:29 AM PDT by The Raven

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:14:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

With a gigantic IRS 1040 income-tax form covering a slightly ajar door presumably leading to a room filled with tightly guarded information, the headline of Newsweek's current cover story screams: "The Dirty Little Secret of the Tax Cut: Why It's Smaller Than You Think." Inside, the article greets the reader with the bold assertion: "Why Your Tax Cut Doesn't Add Up." But the only thing that doesn't add up is the article itself. It is replete with misstatements and distortions masquerading as the real-life experiences of Americans since President Bush's tax cuts were enacted in 2001 and 2003.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 2004election; 2004electionbias; antibush; boycott; boycottnewsweek; bushtaxcut; bushtaxcuts; ccrm; economicrecovery; election2004; lyingliars; mediabias; medialies; mediashillsforkerry; newsweek; taxcut; taxcuts; taxes; taxsurplus; theeconomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: The Raven
Newsweek, huh?
I haven't seen a copy of Newsweek since my daughter's braces came off.
41 posted on 04/10/2004 8:38:45 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
I thought I did pretty good under the current tax system. I'm a single dad, have sole custody of my ten year old daughter - here's my 2003 info:

Adjusted gross $23,219
Taxable income $10,119
Total tax $19
Total payments $1,613
Refund $1,594
Effective tax rate -4.35%

I can't complain.
42 posted on 04/10/2004 8:55:38 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob (LORD, WHAT CAN THE HARVEST HOPE FOR, IF NOT FOR THE CARE OF THE REAPER MAN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
I think you may be due another 1,000

see here

http://www.irs.gov/individuals/article/0,,id=96406,00.html


e-mail if you have questions
43 posted on 04/10/2004 9:31:15 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Stillwaters
Ping!
44 posted on 04/10/2004 9:34:21 AM PDT by lonevoice (Some things have to be believed to be seen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Since I never bother with Newsweek, I'm not sure how they handle letters to the editor; but letters to them and the editors of newspapers nationwide spelling out this set of facts should arrive from thousands of FReepers. Then the "usual suspects" (O'Reilly. Rush, Hannity, etc.) should be brought up to speed on it. Gotta' get the word out to the woefully underinformed ABCNNBCBS victims somehow.
45 posted on 04/10/2004 9:43:55 AM PDT by JimRed (Fight election fraud! Volunteer as a local poll watcher, challenger or district official.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Okay...I know why these people didn't get a tax cut. They're paying more taxes now than three years ago...because they're making MORE money! Or else they expected the tax cut to eliminate the loathed 1040 form.
46 posted on 04/10/2004 9:51:55 AM PDT by dufekin (Eliminate genocidal terrorist military dictator Kim Jong Il ASAP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Yeah, and I imagine a lot of this brain dead portion of the population read the Wash Times.(/sarcasm)

I haven't subscribed to Time or Newsweek for DECADES and urge all here to do the same (if you haven't already).

47 posted on 04/10/2004 9:54:00 AM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Whoops, I forgot...some of these people may have simply miscalculated their taxes, or they checked the little box on some form that says, "I oppose the tax cut and wish to pay a tax rate of _____%." (which must be greater than the minimum tax rate.)
48 posted on 04/10/2004 9:54:03 AM PDT by dufekin (Eliminate genocidal terrorist military dictator Kim Jong Il ASAP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; All
Thank you for the ping. If you want to rid yourself of a magazine, newsletter or anything to which you did not subscribe, write "Return to Sender - We did not subscribe" or simply "Refused" and give it to your mailman. Should the mailman refuse it, drop it in a mail drop box or the post office.

Sometimes you have to do it twice, but it will stop and it will also cut down on some of your junk mail! It's like replying to the credit card companies using their own postage - write boldly across the application "remove me from your mailing/offers list" and drop it in their SASE.

Hope this helps!
49 posted on 04/10/2004 10:25:12 AM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
bump
50 posted on 04/10/2004 10:36:43 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Bump!
51 posted on 04/10/2004 9:19:34 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl (Glad to be a monthly contributor to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Newsweek's uncritical portrayal of their demonstrably false assertions amounts to nothing more than a reprehensible journalistic hit piece.

I guess Newsweak doesn't realize they are seriesly undercutting the DIMS major economic argument as to why we should vote for THEM instead of Bush. The DIMS claim that it was these HUGH tax cuts that helped wreck the economy!

Just WHO, pray tell, are we to believe?
I'll chose NEITHER!

52 posted on 04/10/2004 10:28:25 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Oh yeah, good stuff, back up top for others to check out!
53 posted on 04/11/2004 5:39:59 AM PDT by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Also, from Townhall.com...

In a Saturday editorial, the Washington Times skewered Newsweek pretty good for the latter’s “Dirty Little Secret of the Tax Cut” cover story.

 But since Saturday papers are the least well read, and you probably don’t get the Times anyway, you probably didn’t see it.

 So let me summarize.  Newsweek identified three families, one of which made $32,400 in 2003, the second $73,411 and the third $194,000.   Each of the three was quoted, bitching about how they hadn’t gotten anything out of the Bush tax cuts.  But the Times analysis shows that the single-income-mom low income family actually benefited $1,000, or 45% from the cuts, while the middle income folks saved $2,800 (44%) and the high income earners, who told Newsweek all the tax cut benefits must have gone to the “major corporations who are downsizing and outsourcing,” received at least $6,899 in Bush tax reductions.

 It’s hard to deny that somebody is saving a bunch of money as a result of the cuts.  Just this week, the Tax Foundation released its annual calculation of Tax Freedom Day, the day when, to quote the Foundation’s statement: “…Americans will finally have earned enough money to pay off their total tax bill for the year. Every dollar that’s officially called income by the government is counted, and every payment to the government that is officially considered a tax is counted. Taxes at all levels of government are included, whether levied by Uncle Sam or state and local governments.”

 In 2004, Tax Freedom Day is today, April 11, Easter Sunday.  If you’re the average American, every dollar you’ve earned so far this year goes to pay your taxes.  Starting Monday, you can keep what you earn.  And you know what?  Tax Freedom Day, 2004, is the earliest it has been since 1967

Nineteen Freaking Sixty Seven!  I got married that year.  You might not even have been born yet.  Carl Yastrzemski led the Red Sox to the American League pennant and the Cardinals’ Bob Gibson beat them in the 7th game of the World Series.  Che Guevara and Carl Sandburg died.  Kurt Cobain and Julia Roberts were born.  Dustin Hoffman got seduced by Anne Bancroft in “The Graduate.”  Robert McNamara resigned as LBJ’s Defense Secretary.

Tax Freedom Day was on April 10.  Since then, it’s bounced around the last half of April, topping out on May 2 in 2000.  Since then, the Bush cuts have pushed it back each year.  When you look at the chart, there’s this uncanny connection between the peaks of Tax Freedom Day and the several recessions that have occurred over the forty-year period. In spite of the unprecedented disruption caused by 9/11, the recession that started after Clinton’s Tax Freedom Day peak didn’t last long.  Did the massive Bush tax cuts have anything to do with cutting it off?  It sure looks like it.

Note too, that Tax Freedom Day also considers state and local taxes.  The Democrats have been running around claiming that because Bush cut Federal taxes, responsible state and local leaders had to raise the rates.  Wrong-o, Charlie.

But that kind of stuff is the brand spanking clean little secret of the tax cut, so it doesn’t make Newsweek, even though it is much bigger news, one would think than the blather writer Allan Sloan fills his article with.

But it’s not the article so much as what the Newsweek editors did with it that really stinks.  The three families (Where do they find these people?  What are their politics?) all were quoted with disparaging comments about the tax cuts.  These sidebars, with photos and dramatic graphics, will be vastly more well read than Sloan’s text  – even though, as the Times analysis shows, the spokesfolks don’t know what they’re talking about.  I’ve made a few man-on-the-street commercials in my day, and I guarantee you I can find three people to say they think next July we collide with Mars, or even, (Gasp!) that Bush’s tax cuts are just Jim-dandy and helped them out a lot, personally.

Then there’s the matter of Newsweek’s cover.  The cover, with its Form 1040 graphic and screaming headline will be read by millions of passersby who never bother to pick up the magazine and read the article, much less read a critical newspaper editorial, or, for that matter, an Internet columnist.

Those magazine covers are like having Vote for Kerry signs in every supermarket, drug store, airport bookshop and street corner newsstand in America.  And it’s all completely unregulated by the McCain-Feingold Act.

The national news media, Newsweek most assuredly included, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Democratic party, and has been since way back when Tax Freedom Day was even earlier than it is now. 

This year, the grand strategy of the Left is to take each and every one of Bush’s strong points (his reaction to 9/11, his tax cuts) and tarnish them. 

To fight back, Bush needs to take things like the Tax Freedom Day announcement and paste it over the cover of each and every Newsweek in America.  Cause it’s working, folks, no matter what the magazine’s uninformed spokespeople say.

Veteran GOP media consultant Jay Bryant's regular columns are available at www.theoptimate.com, and his commentaries may be heard on NPR's 'All Things Considered.'

54 posted on 04/11/2004 5:45:48 AM PDT by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson