Skip to comments.
File-sharing to bypass censorship
The BBC ^
| 2004/04/09 08:25:09 GMT
| Tracey Logan
Posted on 04/09/2004 6:34:40 PM PDT by FreedomCalls
By the year 2010, file-sharers could be swapping news rather than music, eliminating censorship of any kind.
This is the view of the man who helped kickstart the concept of peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing, Cambridge University's Professor Ross Anderson.
In his vision, people around the world would post stories via anonymous P2P services like those used to swap songs.
They would cover issues currently ignored by the major news services, said Prof Anderson.
"Currently, only news that's reckoned to be of interest to Americans and Western Europeans will be syndicated because that's where the money is," he told the BBC World Service programme, Go Digital.
"But if something happens in Peru that's of interest to viewers in China and Japan, it won't get anything like the priority for syndication.
"If you can break the grip of the news syndication services and allow the news collector to talk to the radio station or local newspaper then you can have much more efficient communications."
'Impossible to censor'
To enable this, Prof Anderson proposes a new and improved version of Usenet, the internet news service.
But what of fears that the infrastructure that allows such ad hoc news networks to grow might also be abused by criminals and terrorists?
Prof Anderson believes those fears are overstated. He argued that web watchdogs like the Internet Watch Foundation, which monitors internet-based child abuse, would provide the necessary policing functions.
This would require a high level of international agreement to be effective.
"The effect of peer-to-peer networks will be to make censorship difficult, if not impossible," said Prof Anderson.
"If there's material that everyone agrees is wicked, like child pornography, then it's possible to track it down and close it down. But if there's material that only one government says is wicked then, I'm sorry, but that's their tough luck".
Political obstacles
Commenting on Prof Anderson's ideas, technology analyst Bill Thompson welcomed the idea of new publishing tools that will weaken the grip on news of major news organisations.
Such P2P systems, he said, would give everybody a voice and allow personal testimonies to come out.
But the technology that makes those publishing tools accessible to everyone and sufficiently user-friendly will take longer to develop than Prof Anderson thinks, added Mr Thompson.
Prof Anderson's vision underestimates the political obstacles in the way of such developments, he said, and the question of censorship had not been clearly thought through.
"Once you build the technology to break censorship, you've broken censorship - even of the things you want censored," said Mr Thompson.
"Saying you can then control some parts of it, like images of child abuse, is being wilfully optimistic. And that's something that peer to peer advocates have to face."
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fr; p2p
There is already such a P2P network -- it's called "FreeRepublic"! Even as they try to censor our access to news -- Free Republic is there.
To: FreedomCalls
Will FR ever go p2p??
2
posted on
04/09/2004 6:50:57 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Hey, I am on the internet. I have a right (cough, cough) to write stupid things.)
To: FreedomCalls
There is already such a P2P network -- it's called "FreeRepublic"! Even as they try to censor our access to news -- Free Republic is there. I rely heavily on FR for news. I get truth here.
3
posted on
04/09/2004 6:54:35 PM PDT
by
LibKill
(Yep, we are cowboys. WYATT EARP cowboys.)
To: LibKill
It will be killed by trolls..........
To: AlbertWang
It will be killed by trolls.......... Trolls have tried and trolls have been Zotted, and FR is still here.
5
posted on
04/09/2004 7:00:49 PM PDT
by
LibKill
(Yep, we are cowboys. WYATT EARP cowboys.)
To: FreedomCalls
The internet has broken the stranglehold the major media has. More and more people are becoming aware of it.
However the problem with the internet is too much information. Therefore you need places like freerepublic where you can go to.
People will probably gravitate to the type of "spin" they want to hear. But all in all, I expect reporting will become more factual and balanced not less.
6
posted on
04/09/2004 7:06:23 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: FreedomCalls
I guess you're referring to Jim's post "
More copyright complaints".
I'm wondering if we take up using "eMule Plus", Peer to Peer software available at http://emuleplus.sourceforge.net and establish an online community using capabilities like Community Sharing, Countermeasures against unfair clients, Source Filters, Queue Filters, etc. as mentioned in the comprehensive list of features would be a way to overcome the censorship and maintain the wonderful FreeRepublic archives?
I stumbled across this evening and it was too much of a coincidence not to mention.
7
posted on
04/09/2004 7:08:29 PM PDT
by
plsjr
(one of His <><)
To: LibKill
Trolls are killed by the mods, in true P2P there are not mods.
You'll be seeing stories about masonic conspiracies, Contrails, Jack Ruby, Faked moon landings.......... OK, nothing changes.
To: plsjr
Hmmm. please replace the 'this' in my last paragraph with 'eMule Plus this' -
anxiousness sometimes overcomes proofreading discipline.
:<
9
posted on
04/09/2004 7:13:54 PM PDT
by
plsjr
(one of His <><)
To: GeronL
Will FR ever go p2p?? There's lots of FreepMailing going on behind the scenes that you may not know about.
10
posted on
04/09/2004 7:31:34 PM PDT
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
I always get left out *sniff* /jk
11
posted on
04/09/2004 7:58:09 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Hey, I am on the internet. I have a right (cough, cough) to write stupid things.)
To: FreedomCalls
I don't understand how this P2P works. Is it a special software? How can it be used to share news stories? How does it maintain our private information?
12
posted on
04/09/2004 11:05:26 PM PDT
by
Free2Be49
(A wise man's heart inclines him toward the right, but a fool's heart toward the left. Ecc. 10:2 RSV)
To: FreedomCalls
I don't understand why a P2P network is an advantage over what we have today. Much of what we currently find on the internet is uncensored. Look at the blog sites. People say pretty much whatever they want and you can read what they post and decide for yourself. Or is the point that there is some control over the blog sites. And with P2P, there wouldn't even be that?
13
posted on
04/09/2004 11:56:44 PM PDT
by
DentsRun
To: LibKill
I rely heavily on FR for news. I get truth here. Well we all do. But even FR is censored. On a couple of occasions in the recent past I tried to post what I thought were really interesting stories only to discover they camed from banned sites.
14
posted on
04/09/2004 11:59:00 PM PDT
by
DentsRun
To: FreedomCalls
But what of fears that the infrastructure that allows such ad hoc news networks to grow might also be abused by criminals and terrorists? Or PR firms...
15
posted on
04/10/2004 12:00:28 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(NFL Owners: Grown men don't watch hollywood peep shows with wives and children.)
To: FreedomCalls
Bump
16
posted on
04/10/2004 1:54:34 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(FReepers are the greatest!!)
To: Jim Robinson
No banners or spam on FR hurrah bump.
The way to read the news.
17
posted on
04/10/2004 2:04:25 AM PDT
by
Glenn
(The two keys to character: 1) Learn how to keep a secret. 2) ...)
To: plsjr
Interesting concept. When you consider what Bit Torrent is, one can imagine millions of Bit Torrent engines plodding anonymously forwarding news everywhere on the globe. Bit Torrent is a massively parallel engine that uses as many "servers" as it can find to do P2P. I loaded it to download the free Lindows Live CD.
18
posted on
04/10/2004 2:04:54 AM PDT
by
I_dmc
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson