There is already such a P2P network -- it's called "FreeRepublic"! Even as they try to censor our access to news -- Free Republic is there.
To: FreedomCalls
Will FR ever go p2p??
2 posted on
04/09/2004 6:50:57 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Hey, I am on the internet. I have a right (cough, cough) to write stupid things.)
To: FreedomCalls
There is already such a P2P network -- it's called "FreeRepublic"! Even as they try to censor our access to news -- Free Republic is there. I rely heavily on FR for news. I get truth here.
3 posted on
04/09/2004 6:54:35 PM PDT by
LibKill
(Yep, we are cowboys. WYATT EARP cowboys.)
To: FreedomCalls
The internet has broken the stranglehold the major media has. More and more people are becoming aware of it.
However the problem with the internet is too much information. Therefore you need places like freerepublic where you can go to.
People will probably gravitate to the type of "spin" they want to hear. But all in all, I expect reporting will become more factual and balanced not less.
6 posted on
04/09/2004 7:06:23 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: FreedomCalls
I guess you're referring to Jim's post "
More copyright complaints".
I'm wondering if we take up using "eMule Plus", Peer to Peer software available at http://emuleplus.sourceforge.net and establish an online community using capabilities like Community Sharing, Countermeasures against unfair clients, Source Filters, Queue Filters, etc. as mentioned in the comprehensive list of features would be a way to overcome the censorship and maintain the wonderful FreeRepublic archives?
I stumbled across this evening and it was too much of a coincidence not to mention.
7 posted on
04/09/2004 7:08:29 PM PDT by
plsjr
(one of His <><)
To: FreedomCalls
I don't understand how this P2P works. Is it a special software? How can it be used to share news stories? How does it maintain our private information?
12 posted on
04/09/2004 11:05:26 PM PDT by
Free2Be49
(A wise man's heart inclines him toward the right, but a fool's heart toward the left. Ecc. 10:2 RSV)
To: FreedomCalls
I don't understand why a P2P network is an advantage over what we have today. Much of what we currently find on the internet is uncensored. Look at the blog sites. People say pretty much whatever they want and you can read what they post and decide for yourself. Or is the point that there is some control over the blog sites. And with P2P, there wouldn't even be that?
13 posted on
04/09/2004 11:56:44 PM PDT by
DentsRun
To: FreedomCalls
But what of fears that the infrastructure that allows such ad hoc news networks to grow might also be abused by criminals and terrorists? Or PR firms...
15 posted on
04/10/2004 12:00:28 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(NFL Owners: Grown men don't watch hollywood peep shows with wives and children.)
To: FreedomCalls
Bump
16 posted on
04/10/2004 1:54:34 AM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(FReepers are the greatest!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson