Replies

you're finally right for once. yes he is doing the exact same thing you did. What you still fail to understand is that what you did was to LIE about what I said, take to a rediculous level, and then claim that meant my position was wrong. Again it's like saying you shouldn't drink water because if you drank a HUGE quantity all at once you'll die. that's what you did, that's what he's doing, it is unethical, dishonest, and frankly pathetic.

I haven't run and hidden at all. But you on the other hand continue to. You said undercutting competition was unethical, you used to work at WalMart: were you unethical when working at WalMart and helping them undercut the competition?!

I guess if an evil drug company made a cure for XBOB's diabetes or a cure for Havoc's disability they would only buy it if it was made in America.

Maybe not even then because the drug company didn't do it to be nice but did it for filthy profit.

Oh, the humanity!!

I cited what you said and anyone here can go back and read through the arguments and get to the same point I did rather easily. It's when you start making mutually exclusive statements as though they were fact that you're getting yourself in trouble. IE - that companies have no duty to anyone or anything but to profit. It's the same argumentation line your compadres got tripped up in the other night - exactly the same - and you walked right down the rosey path just like a sport. Problem is your unethical arguments and positions are, at this point, predictable.

See the whole point of saying that companies owe to nothing but profits is to hope someone will buy it and leave them alone to do what they will. Just like you're friends argue it from the more direct approach. Your position is to try and convince people that outsourcing is just another way of getting profit and that ethics should not be a hindrance to those profits. That is the free trade mantra. It isn't right to regulate; so, don't cause it isn't right.. Don't do anything to stop the great god, profit.