Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lando
1 posted on 04/09/2004 11:26:26 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lando Lincoln
My apologies - the author is David Katz.

Lando

2 posted on 04/09/2004 11:27:37 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln (GWB in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


3 posted on 04/09/2004 11:29:20 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Gee golly wowsers. You mean.............you mean ...........ABC is actually.............biased?????!!!!!!

Knock me over with a feather.

4 posted on 04/09/2004 11:31:17 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Jennings is poster boy for 'clueless'. He would not know 'ethical' if it bit him where it hurts.
5 posted on 04/09/2004 11:31:53 AM PDT by SMARTY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
I noticed on their radio news reports yesterday (same station as Rush) Petah Jennings gave more time to clips from liberal widows than he gave to clips from Rice's testimony.
6 posted on 04/09/2004 11:34:20 AM PDT by Spyder (Just another day in Paradise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
ABC’s Coverage of Condoleezza Rice’s TestimonyJust About Anything They've Ever Covered Violated Journalistic Ethics

I'm a stickler for accuracy. ;)
7 posted on 04/09/2004 11:36:28 AM PDT by adam_az (Call your state Republican party office and VOLUNTEER FOR A CAMPAIGN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Wait a minute--Clarke is exactly the guy who should be asked about Rice's testimony. Although he's made himself so much a part of the news that it might not be ethical for them to pay him.
9 posted on 04/09/2004 11:55:58 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Called my local station and spoke to the news director about this BS. Initially, I got the "that's the national, we don't control" crap. I pointed out the conflicts and said, "I won't watch the national broadcast, I switched to cable. Once there, I don't tune back, so you're affected. Look around the newsroom at all the young people who won't have jobs because Jenning's antics are loosing you viewers."

There was a big change in the attitude after having said that.

10 posted on 04/09/2004 12:04:27 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (How can they call it a "Peace March" when they unconditionally support those who kill our soldiers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Lando, this from the network who presents former Clinton dog-robber George Stephenopolis as an unbaised talking head every Sunday morning...
12 posted on 04/09/2004 12:26:59 PM PDT by vrwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
I suggest sending this to Howard Kurtz. Although a lib, he's one of the minority of fair-minded indiviuals, and deals with journalistic issues on TV.
14 posted on 04/09/2004 12:47:52 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
The Society of Professional Journalist’s Code of Ethics gives multiple reasons why this violates journalistic ethics:

Well there is your problem right there! This Society must be obsolete now, because there are no journalists, or ethics in the media anymore.

The media, where former democrat policy makers go to be "objective consultants" on the way up to having their own shows.

19 posted on 04/09/2004 3:58:50 PM PDT by ladyinred (Anger the left! Become a MONTHLY DONOR to FreeRepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Tim Russert is just as bad.
20 posted on 04/09/2004 4:26:23 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Clarke's record is failure, failure, failure, failure: with some 30 body count and over a billion dollars in losses.

His work kept Reno busy investigating for Bill Clinton's cops & robbers grand jury approach to international.

No wonder that our best troops left active duty. Failure to serve under fascists, aka Clintons, is the most honorable path for our warriors to have taken.

Clarke with the rest of the Clintonazis ensured that we would be hit harder - somewhere.

Why Clarke was not demoted further is a big question yet answered.

It surely appears obvious that Clarke has been enticed by the Clintonazis' DNC-Politburo's $$,$$$,$$$ for him to write a hit piece on the only president who properly responded to islamist terrorism. IMO, Clarke is lying, paid to lie, paid to sensationalize both by his publisher, ABC, and IMHO probably the Clinton Library/Clintonazis' DNC-Politburo's slush funds which keeps XXX-42 flying high. Where there is smoke, there is secreet police for Hillary.

Bush as president is no responsible for the Saudi's taking over our 4 airplanes to kill thousands of human beings than Bill & Hillary Clinton as co-presidents were responsible for the loss of life at WTC I through the 17 dead sailors and nearly the loss of our warship.

Clinton was a failure just as Jimmy Carter, but corrupt and self-absorbed as Nero.

In my opinion, co-presidents Bill & Hillary Clinton are personally responsible for the terrible error in judgement for having to USS Cole enter the port in Yemen. That port of call was purely political, announced as such. The islamists are responsible for the murders, so - we should kill them while no more than spitting on XXX-XX-42s.

The Clintonazis' DNC-Politburo has made this "commission" a witch hunt to smear and blame candidate G.W. Bush (and the potential political career of Dr. Rice) for this November's election rather than its chartered purpose. Fascism is fundamentally abuse of the powers of government.



21 posted on 04/09/2004 4:29:45 PM PDT by SevenDaysInMay (Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
I looked up Journalistic Ethics in the dictionary and it said-see oxymoron!

Pray for W and The Truth

22 posted on 04/09/2004 6:54:27 PM PDT by bray (Hey Yaaaawn, why don't YOU give $750,000,000 to the gummit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln
Journalistic "ethics" no longer exists.
Ethics will return to "jounalism" when
the networks and their news organizations
plus the newspapers can be routinely and
successfully sued for large amounts of money
for their slanders, misrepresentations,
defamations and bias. Until then don't expect
any balance or fairness from the these lying
DemonRAT Party propaganda organs.
29 posted on 04/09/2004 10:10:22 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lando Lincoln

Journalism has ethics standards? Next thing you'll try telling me is Hannity has a book out, and Kerry served in Vietnam.


31 posted on 04/10/2004 1:59:52 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Democrats are the real asses of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson