Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is John Kerry even eligible to run for President?
U.S. Constituion with questions and commentary ^ | 3/7/04 | Jack Black

Posted on 04/09/2004 7:07:18 AM PDT by Jack Black

A simple reading of the Constitution and knowledge of history suggests the John Kerry may not be eligible to run for President.

Ammendment 14 says in part:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Now, Kerry took an oath as a naval officer prior to his service in Vietnam. Upon his return he led an organization designed to pressure the government to end a war. I think many would agree this clearly rose to the level of "aid and comfort" to the enemy.

Thus a plain reading of the Constiution suggests that Kerry is not eligible for President, unless 2/3 of each House remove such disability.

There are more questions than answers posed by this. For instance, who enforces this law? Other requirements for Presidenncy are age attainment and citizenship. In practice it seems that this is all done "on the honor system".

Effectively at the present time who certifies people eligible for office? Each state's secretaries of state? Getting Kerry ruled ineligible to run for President, in even one state would be an intersting exercise.

Fair minded Republicans could then introduce, simultaneously, resolutions "removing the disability, caused by the aid and comfort given to the enemy Communist Party of Vietnam in 1970, that disqualifies John Kerry from running for office."

We could then have long congressional hearings, witness, executive sessions, demand to make records public, etc.

Anyone considered this? I remember when the first whispers began that Clinton should be impeached. It became a roar after Ann Coulters book.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 14th; 2004; ammendment; constitution; issues; kerry; warcriminal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Jack Black
From the FEC Website on the Electoral College:

After their caucuses and primaries, the major parties nominate their candidates for president and vice president in their national conventions traditionally held in the summer preceding the election. (Third parties and independent candidates follow different procedures according to the individual State laws). The names of the duly nominated candidates are then officially submitted to each State's chief election official so that they might appear on the general election ballot.

41 posted on 04/09/2004 9:31:49 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
It would seem to me that the "States top election official" logically has some responsibility to certify that the submitted names meet the statutory requirement to run for the office. However the people in the Washington Sec. of States' office seem to imply that they do not do any checks. They stated clearly that "we have no regulatory, investigative or enforcement capability".
42 posted on 04/09/2004 9:40:16 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
RCW 29.04.030
Prevention and correction of election frauds and errors. (Effective until July 1, 2004.)
Any justice of the supreme court, judge of the court of appeals, or judge of the superior court in the proper county shall, by order, require any person charged with error, wrongful act, or neglect to forthwith correct the error, desist from the wrongful act, or perform the duty and to do as the court orders or to show cause forthwith why the error should not be corrected, the wrongful act desisted from, or the duty or order not performed, whenever it is made to appear to such justice or judge by affidavit of an elector that:

(1) An error or omission has occurred or is about to occur in printing the name of any candidate on official ballots; or

(2) An error other than as provided in subsections (1) and (3) of this section has been committed or is about to be committed in printing the ballots; or

(3) The name of any person has been or is about to be wrongfully placed upon the ballots; or

43 posted on 04/09/2004 10:58:53 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
BUMP, this is to good, we can only wish. He sure did "aid the enemy".
44 posted on 04/26/2004 8:38:12 AM PDT by Phyto Chems (What part of "illegal" don't they understand... :-)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phyto Chems
Thanks ! I was surprised more people didn't pile on this.
I'm considering going it alone.
45 posted on 04/26/2004 9:08:05 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
NO!
46 posted on 05/10/2004 11:47:10 PM PDT by PsyOp (Any man can make a mistake; only a fool keeps making the same one. – Cicero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson