Posted on 04/08/2004 12:30:55 AM PDT by kattracks
EDWARD KENNEDY, a man whose ideological and partisan frenzies have apparently obscured his vision, looks at George W. Bush and sees Richard M. Nixon. Perhaps Bush should be grateful. At least Kennedy has not compared the President to a member of the Senate who once skedaddled from the scene of a drowning, forgetting to inform officials about it until 12 hours later.
Is it fair to bring up Chappaquiddick 35 years after Mary Jo Kopechne’s death? Only for this reason: to search out the moral authority of this mouthy man who has repeatedly seen fit to accuse President Bush of grotesquely immoral behavior.
Kennedy has said, for instance, that Bush misled the American people into a war that has resulted in more than 600 American deaths. This week, in a speech at the Brookings Institution, he went even further. The war, he suggested without precisely saying so, was meant to divert public attention from “deceptions here at home,” such as a lie about when the recession started. He said Bush had created “the largest credibility gap since Richard Nixon.” And, news accounts inform us, he referred to Iraq as “George Bush’s Vietnam.”
What we have here is not simply a point of view on issues. It is vile, below-the-belt name-calling, a far remove, say, from the public pronouncements of someone like Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., who spells out policy disagreements in careful arguments. To propose as Kennedy does that the war in Iraq was politically motivated is tantamount to saying Bush has sacrificed lives for his own selfish ends — that the President is murderously Machiavellian.
If you are going to go that far, the least you could do is back up the charges with evidence and analysis. Kennedy gives us hokum and hysteria. For starters, he should figure out that there was no political advantage in a war that would delay economic recovery, run federal spending sky-high and lead to American casualties.
As for Bush misleading the nation about Iraq’s possession of weapons of mass destruction, as Kennedy has alleged, Kennedy himself had worried aloud about such weapons, as had Kennedy’s Massachusetts pal, John Kerry, now running for President. Kennedy is one of those who has also said that Bush warned that the threat from Saddam Hussein was imminent. Beyond any reasonable doubt, Bush did no such thing.
As for Iraq being another Vietnam, Kennedy might pause to reflect that it was his brother John who stepped up our involvement in that Southeast Asian country so as to make extraction difficult, and that it was JFK’s advisers who convinced LBJ that the U.S. stakes there were vital. Despite the fighting now going on in Iraq, it seems close to hallucinatory to suppose we will lose a fraction of the 58,000 American soldiers lost in Vietnam. These two wars are as different as desert and jungle.
The phrase “credibility gap” did not first come into prominence with Nixon, but with LBJ. Skip that for a moment and focus on Kennedy’s own credibility gap when he talks of the recession as if it were somehow Bush’s fault. In fact, the economic slowdown began in the Clinton years, and there is no Bush policy that can be blamed for instigating the recession that officially started in his administration. The Bush domestic policies Kennedy most detests — what he calls tax cuts for the wealthy — have helped spur record economic growth that finally appears to be translating into vast job creation as well.
In bringing up Nixon’s name, Kennedy brings up memories of Watergate, of illegal conduct and disgrace, linking those memories to an understanding of who Bush is. It’s a neat trick if the public does not also think back on Kennedy’s own conduct when he walked away from an underwater car and a passenger who did not walk away.
Kennedy, to his credit, has given himself wholeheartedly to public service since then. While I think his liberal ideology inimical in some respects to American vitality and freedom, I also think he represents liberalism well and that liberal views should be part of the mix in Congress. His attacks on Bush go beyond the bounds. The making of them is itself a character lapse.
Jay Ambrose is director of editorial policy for Scripps Howard Newspapers and can be reached at AmbroseJ@shns.com.
That fact that he left her there to drown while he went for a good night sleep so he could sober up and call his lawyer in the morning constitutes nothing less than cold-blooded murder in my opinion. What a repulsive man. Murderer.
It really is amazing the extent to which one can abuse the human body.
Can't disagree with that. It has completely transformed the country for the worse. There are darned good reasons for not granting suffrage to such a large block of voters. Too bad so few could see that back then.
I see now some 'rats want to enfranchise teenagers, illegal aliens, etc. Bas***** want to destroy the county. There is no doubt about it.
There are a bunch of old ladies around here who think the Kennedys are "marvelous and so charismatic".
That is so true...and sad. What galls me the most is for reasons unknown to me, the fat slob Teddy is considered some kind of "Public Servant". He has been sucking on the public teat now for his entire adult life...what the heck is it with people in Mass. who keep voting this illiterate slob to the senate every 6-years...are there that many mouth-breathers in Massachusetts???
(Not to mention the Bush familiy giving him an award for who the heck knows what??)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerry's problem isn't "haggard," the Botox counterexample notwithstanding. "Haggard" is electable. (See LBJ.) "Cadaveric" is not, at least not outside of Hawaii. Kerry's dissonant new "do," like the mortician's careful coif, only enhanced the funereal gloom. (One has to wonder if Shrum was brought in (dispatched?) to praise Kerry... or to bury him....) Enter Ted Kennedy. (stage left) |
Mia T, 4.22.04 |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
erredy, a lethally anachronistic, post-Vietnam, pre-9/11 liberal conceit, is as much about providing Kerry with a 
merica's real two-front war: fundamentalist Islam on the right and a fundamentally seditious clintonoid