Skip to comments.
Message to Bush: Just say no to MTV
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Saturday, April 03, 2004
| Kyle Williams
Posted on 04/05/2004 11:34:11 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: All
Somewhere...there is another young liberal couple just waiting for THEIR chance. Support Free Republic and dash their hopes!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
04/05/2004 11:35:01 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
To: Support Free Republic
I saw a Choose or Lose ad earlier, tonight. Wow, talk about your unbiased ads. You could tell that they were only interested in getting young people out to vote, rather then pushing any platforms or specific issues, such as the War in Iraq or Gay Marriage. /sarcasm
3
posted on
04/05/2004 11:38:31 PM PDT
by
Green Knight
(Looking forward to seeing Jeb stepping over Hillary's rotting political corpse in 2008.)
To: JohnHuang2
President Bush
should appear on MTV. Of course, he should demand all of the same control in picking the audience and the questions that Bill Clinton was granted. He should also not be harassed in the media for requesting such control since Big Media gave Bubba a pass.
To show how incestous the media was with regards to Clinton's MTV town hall meeting, let's look at the "Boxers or Briefs" question. The girl who asked that was a daughter of a liberal journalist. She sat with her mom to come up with a "good" question. They settled on the legalization of recreational drugs. President Clinton's staff nixed that question and asked her to offer something lighter.
It's like when Hillary Clinton asks interviewers to provide her with a list of the questions they will be asking.
So by all means President Bush should be permitted to speak on the air with young conservatives about America. Read the MTV forums some time. There are young conservatives who reject SeeBS-Viacom-MTV's partisan propaganda.
4
posted on
04/06/2004 12:54:54 AM PDT
by
weegee
(No blood for ratings-CNN suppressed reports of torture & murder in Iraq to keep their Baghdad bureau)
To: weegee
I agree. I don't want Bush on MTV. Let's have at least one grown-up in this race.
5
posted on
04/06/2004 1:03:57 AM PDT
by
Texasforever
(I can’t kill enough brain cells to become a democrat just by drinking.)
To: JohnHuang2
My respect for President Bush would increase if he decided to not appear on MTV. Trash is not worth wading through.
6
posted on
04/06/2004 1:04:37 AM PDT
by
k2blader
(Some folks should worry less about how conservatives vote and more about how to advance conservatism)
To: JohnHuang2
The 18-30 year old demographic, which is 30 million strong, accounted for less than 4 percent of the entire voting population in 2000. In the official (if flawed) final tally, Albert Gore Junior got 0.52% more of the popular vote. 4% can sway an election (or at least the bragging rights).
7
posted on
04/06/2004 1:17:03 AM PDT
by
weegee
(No blood for ratings-CNN suppressed reports of torture & murder in Iraq to keep their Baghdad bureau)
To: JohnHuang2
"MTV Get Off the Air!"--- Jello Biafra
8
posted on
04/06/2004 2:11:23 AM PDT
by
Clemenza
("Knowledge is Good" --- Emil Faber, Founder of Faber College)
To: JohnHuang2; StriperSniper; Mo1
MTV campaign to mobilize 20 million young voters in November. In a concerted effort to Vote Democrat, IMO.
9
posted on
04/06/2004 5:30:02 AM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
To: Support Free Republic
I saw the choose or lose program over the weekend and it was really bad. They want to encourage the youth to vote right, but why make the program only sway to the left why not do it in a way to show what each party is about rather then just showing a liberal p.o.v. Why not teach people to make there own decisions instead of making them for them. Socialistic programs like that is what should really be censored. why can't the media just tell the truth and let people make up there own mind.
10
posted on
04/06/2004 5:38:53 AM PDT
by
shicky
To: Clemenza
""MTV Get Off the Air!"--- Jello Biafra"
My god. Thought I would be the only Dead Kennedy fan here.
To: EQAndyBuzz; Clemenza
My god. Thought I would be the only Dead Kennedy fan here. That's just a side effect of DMSO. ;-)
12
posted on
04/06/2004 8:00:39 AM PDT
by
StriperSniper
(Ernest Strada Fanclub)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: OXENinFLA
Many point to this election year as being a mirror to the 1992 presidential campaigns of George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton. Yup, especially with the "worst economy in 50 years" rhetoric.
14
posted on
04/06/2004 8:16:17 AM PDT
by
StriperSniper
(Ernest Strada Fanclub)
To: JohnHuang2; All
IMHO, no person either in or seeking the Presidency should subject himself to this nonsensical foolishness. There must be dignity at that level.
Of what possible use are questions like, "boxers or briefs?", except to mark the questioner as hopelessly stupid? The proper response, BTW, would have been to say, "Young lady, you had the chance to pose a question to the President of the United States. You asked THAT? Please, gain some maturity and dignity before trying again."
We're talking here about a crowd of kids that want to ask the candidates what they thinkk of Britney Spears. Such detached-from-the-real-world morons deserve no respect or response. Simply appearing on such a show demeans the man who does.
15
posted on
04/06/2004 8:46:37 AM PDT
by
Long Cut
(Hell of a thing, killin' a man. You take away all he's got, and all he's ever gonna have)
To: weegee
There are young conservatives who reject SeeBS-Viacom-MTV's partisan propaganda.
Believe it or not there was actually a report on MTV about the young conservatives (or crashers, as they called them, since they freep protests). I wondered how many of those interviewed were Freepers as well. Just a note, I do NOT watch MTV. Just that my husband was flipping channels and thought the report looked like something interesting to stop on.
16
posted on
04/06/2004 8:54:04 AM PDT
by
HungarianGypsy
(True wisdom is a million times more valuable than liberal intellect.)
To: CecilRhodesRidesAgain
The precedent is certainly there for the President to get to define the audience and nature of the questions.
17
posted on
04/06/2004 11:40:54 AM PDT
by
weegee
(No blood for ratings-CNN suppressed reports of torture & murder in Iraq to keep their Baghdad bureau)
To: Long Cut
IMHO, no person either in or seeking the Presidency should subject himself to this nonsensical foolishness. There must be dignity at that level."Sock it to me???"
18
posted on
04/06/2004 11:48:04 AM PDT
by
weegee
(No blood for ratings-CNN suppressed reports of torture & murder in Iraq to keep their Baghdad bureau)
To: Long Cut; Miss Marple; Poohbah; PJ-Comix; E Rocc; Howlin; PhiKapMom; Catspaw; Dog; Dog Gone; ...
Can't win either way.
Bush can either walk into a known land mine, or cede the entire audience to the Dems without a fight.
Which is the lesser of the evils? I'd say the President ought to go, but he ought to be ready for trick questions. Imagine and plan for the worst, and hope for the best.
19
posted on
04/06/2004 12:02:08 PM PDT
by
hchutch
(Why did the Nazgul bother running from Arwen's flash flood? They only managed to die tired.)
To: hchutch
You are more optimistic about MTV than I. I don't think he should go, unless he has control of the guest list and there are no edits.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson