Could this be part of a plan to eliminate Condi Rice as a potential opponent for Hillary! in 2008?
-PJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: All
Sit Down Hillary .. You're blocking the TV
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2 posted on
04/04/2004 11:54:28 AM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Political Junkie Too
The democreeps have hated Rice since the beginning. I just don't think Condi wants to run for president but that is just my opinion.
3 posted on
04/04/2004 11:57:29 AM PDT by
areafiftyone
(Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
To: Political Junkie Too
It will be interesting to watch the Demorats engage in a "high tech lynching" on another prominent black American. It will be the final nail in the coffin for revealing the highly partisan nature of the Congressional investigation into 9-11.
4 posted on
04/04/2004 11:58:06 AM PDT by
TheDon
(John Kerry, self proclaimed war criminal, Democratic Presidential nominee)
To: Political Junkie Too
Rice is much too valuable to take the fall
What fall?
5 posted on
04/04/2004 11:58:44 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: Political Junkie Too
Ms. Rice is going to wipe the floor with these pikers.
6 posted on
04/04/2004 12:00:00 PM PDT by
Spruce
(Never make excuses whether or not it is your fault.)
To: Political Junkie Too
her days in politics are numbered Right. The number is zero. She is a civil servant.
7 posted on
04/04/2004 12:00:11 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
To: Political Junkie Too
I would like to focus on the following:
The Bush administration was in office 9 months before 9/11 happened.
The Clinton Administration for eight years and despite repeated Terrorist actions against us and the world, he did nothing to stop it. He even let Bin Laden go when he was offered to him by Sudan. A total withhunt by the Media Elites who have the power in this country, instead of the people.
Since we are dumbing down America more and more it will become easier to influence and control the minds of the masses.
To: Political Junkie Too
Pardon me, but I don't believe these folks need to be excerpted. The LA Times does.
BTW, if anyone takes a fall, then I think it will be DCI Tenet.
9 posted on
04/04/2004 12:01:02 PM PDT by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: Political Junkie Too
Well, I don't know anybody who thinks that Rice's days are numbered. More "divide and conquer" nonsense from the left.
11 posted on
04/04/2004 12:03:41 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Political Junkie Too
Yet it will take much work to undue the collateral damage... Aren't spell-checkers great? They help ewe right without errors.
13 posted on
04/04/2004 12:06:01 PM PDT by
Bob
To: Political Junkie Too
The Dems have several disgraceful goals in regard to Dr. Rice:
1) force Rice's resignation
2) once Rice has resigned, excoriate Bush for making Rice take the fall and not accepting responsibility for the 9/11 attacks himself
3) play the race and gender cards with respect to #2
4) neutralize Rice's potential to run for any political office, including the presidency
The commission is going to ambush Dr. Rice at the hearings this Thursday. I have tremendous faith in Dr. Rice's abilities, but her performance won't change the Dem's plans. The Dems already have their conclusions drawn and they aren't going to let facts get in their way.
My hope is that the Dems' game will only cause Bush to draw Dr. Rice in closer - as it did in the summer of 2002, when the Dems first started calling for her resignation.
18 posted on
04/04/2004 12:10:25 PM PDT by
Spotsy
(Bush-Cheney '04)
To: Political Junkie Too
If Condi were a Democrat, some would say that what we have been witessing is another high-tech lynching. If you recall, anytime the mean, white Republicans dared to question the integrity of any of Clinton's minority appointments, it was assumed to be racial in origin.
25 posted on
04/04/2004 12:14:35 PM PDT by
cwb
(Kerry on terrorism "after" 9/11: "I think there has been an exaggeration")
To: Political Junkie Too
The whole system is broke. The irony is that no one could have predicted 9/11 just like no one can predict the future. This 3-ring circus is designed to make big government look like they're relevant. In reality, they are the problem, not the solution.
To: Political Junkie Too
Clarke vs. Rice in a credibility contest?
Hmmmmmm... wonder where the smart money's heading?
28 posted on
04/04/2004 12:16:50 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Political Junkie Too
Take the fall for WHAT??? Boy, are these people trying to create an image that the Bush administration has done something wrong and the horrible part is, it is working.
37 posted on
04/04/2004 12:32:16 PM PDT by
Toespi
(,)
To: Political Junkie Too
I would say more of a "plan" to replace her with a neo-con.
40 posted on
04/04/2004 12:34:24 PM PDT by
cynicom
To: Political Junkie Too
Bush officials have quickly circled the wagons around her. In their furious counterattack against Clarke, they have all but branded him a liar and a self-serving, book peddling opportunist,Yes, they let Sen. Frist say it outright. :)
41 posted on
04/04/2004 12:35:18 PM PDT by
StriperSniper
(Ernest Strada Fanclub)
To: Political Junkie Too
In their furious counterattack against Clarke, they have all but branded him a liar and a self-serving, book peddling opportunist Earl O., Clarke IS a lying, self-serving, book peddling opportunist. He's also a disloyal s.o.b.
45 posted on
04/04/2004 1:12:01 PM PDT by
Bernard Marx
(In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.)
To: Political Junkie Too
"A White House damage-control effort has been busily under way, and Rice has dropped her opposition to publicly testifying under oath before the 9-11 Commission. Yet it will take much work to undue the collateral damage from Clarke's attack ..."
This whole media SPIN bothers me immesnely.
Clarke lied, or at least said stuff that was demonstrably false. The White House shouldnt have been the ones to correct this, the MEDIA should have. This description is devoid of the underlying TRUTH at stake: Clarke is simply false when he says that the Clinton administration was serious about terrorism for 8 years but Bush administration didnt do enough in 8 months - facts are stubborn things and they disprove him 100%.
Here we have the usual media stalking-horse technique for dragging the administration down:
1. Find a vehicle for lobbing an unfair attack. (Clarke)
2. Report on it without ANY COMMENT on its veracity, give it as much authority as possible (ie point out how Clarke has served in X many administrations, but fail to point out how he voted for Gore, supports Kerry, and has a book to sell and is possibly exaggerating to garner attention for himself).
3. When nobody in the press critiques it fairly wait for Bush administration to respond. Then label any such comments as a "furious" response and make it sound as political as possible.
The end result: You have succeeded in planting this as a plausible story which only 'Bush supporters' deny, even though the original charge is totally baseless. The media falls down on the job.
Isnt media bias charming?
46 posted on
04/04/2004 1:26:05 PM PDT by
WOSG
(http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - Disturb, manipulate, demonstrate for the right thing)
To: Political Junkie Too
Oh yeah, this one could go far in the Republican Party and the rats can't stand it...
48 posted on
04/04/2004 2:05:07 PM PDT by
hope
(How far will your passion take you?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson