Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's Science Aide Rejects Claims of Distorted Facts
NY Times ^ | April 3, 2004 | ANDREW C. REVKIN

Posted on 04/02/2004 11:54:06 PM PST by neverdem

The New York Times


April 3, 2004

Bush's Science Aide Rejects Claims of Distorted Facts

By ANDREW C. REVKIN

The White House issued a detailed rebuttal yesterday to accusations by an advocacy group and 60 prominent scientists that the Bush administration had distorted or suppressed scientific information to suit its politics.

In a letter to Congress, which had requested a White House response, Dr. John H. Marburger III, science adviser to President Bush, said most of the accusations were false and in some cases "preposterous."

In February, the advocacy group, the Union of Concerned Scientists, which has long criticized administration policies on issues like biotechnology, global warming and nuclear power, released a 38-page report, finding, "There is significant evidence that the scope and scale of the manipulation, suppression and misrepresentation of science by the Bush administration is unprecedented."

The report was endorsed by 60 influential scientists, including 20 Nobel laureates and people who had served in past Republican administrations.

Yesterday, Dr. Marburger rejected almost every point. "The accusations in the document are inaccurate, and certainly do not justify the sweeping conclusions of either the document or the accompanying statement," he wrote.

In a few places, he said, the administration had erred, but he added that the mistakes had nothing to do with a lack of scientific integrity.

For instance, he agreed that the Environmental Protection Agency had included text from a document prepared by lawyers for the utilities industry in the preamble of a proposed rule restricting power-plant pollution. But that text, he said, had no bearing "on the integrity of the science used by E.P.A."

Yesterday, scientists and experts not directly involved in the debate said the matter was not settled.

"The scientific community delivered a hard message and he has responded on behalf of the administration and on behalf of his own views in a thorough way," said Dr. Donald Kennedy, the editor in chief of the journal Science and commissioner of food and drugs under President Jimmy Carter.

The original report can be read on the Web at www.ucsusa.org and the administration's response at www.ostp.gov.

One significant accusation in the group's report was that the administration, in dealing with a wide array of scientific advisory panels, had often dismissed experts, or selected others, because of their views on contentious subjects.

Dr. Marburger said that the White House was determined to maintain balance on such committees and that asking for experts' views on issues was a way to achieve diversity.

But he said, "The accusation of a litmus test that must be met before someone can serve on an advisory panel is preposterous."

He noted that he himself was "a lifelong Democrat."

The scientists' group also accused the administration of revising scientific reports to make them mesh better with White House policy. A notable example was a heavily edited section on climate change in a draft E.P.A. report on the environment last year: the White House removed almost any finding pointing to a human link to warming global temperatures. After a battle with the White House, the agency dropped the entire section, leaving a hole in what was supposed to be an overview of environmental trends.

Yesterday, Dr. Marburger said the section was dropped because more voluminous reports on climate change were in the works.

After a quick review of the White House rebuttal, which was released in the afternoon with no notice, Dr. Kurt Gottfried, an emeritus professor of physics at Cornell who is chairman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the group would take a fresh look at all the issues.

"It's possible there are things we got wrong," Dr. Gottfried said. "We're not infallible, like the Vatican or the White House. But I don't think there's any reason to think we got the big picture wrong. In fact, our case is stronger now than when we produced that report."

He did not back down from the group's contention that science was more abused by the current administration than by its predecessors.

"I think the average age of those who signed the letter is well over 60," Dr. Gottfried said. "We've seen many an administration come and go, and many have served in those administrations. When we say that this pattern is, in extent, unprecedented we mean that."


Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Japan; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: biotechnology; bush43; globalwarming; johnmarburger; nuclearpower; science; ucs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Some pertinent previous posts:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1107895/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1108924/posts

Why did the White House time their rebuttal for the Saturday edition?

1 posted on 04/02/2004 11:54:07 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


2 posted on 04/02/2004 11:55:05 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
PING
3 posted on 04/02/2004 11:55:09 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
OH MY! Bush scientist "distorting". We all know the Democrats NEVER use scientist to distort their views! NEVER! </sarcasm>
4 posted on 04/02/2004 11:56:00 PM PST by Fledermaus (Ðíé F£éðérmáú§ ^;;^ says, "I give Dick Clarke's American Grandstand a 39...you can't dance to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1107895/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1108924/posts

Here you go.
5 posted on 04/02/2004 11:56:35 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Didn't Ayn Rand have a "Union of Concerned Scientists" in Atlas Shrugged?
6 posted on 04/03/2004 12:01:54 AM PST by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
What is really odd is that Bush has the best science teams since Reagan was in office. they actually have the nations interests at heart and Science policy under Bush has taken every effort to cross the aisle. I wish W. would push his accomplishments in this area a bit. THE DoE's national research facilities plan, for instance is quite excellent = some is the astronomy program.
7 posted on 04/03/2004 2:38:12 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Would that be the "Close Cover Before Striking Institute For Concerned Scientists?
8 posted on 04/03/2004 2:58:30 AM PST by Solamente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The media usually don't tell the truth about President Bush's policies on enviroment. Here is the truth:

Preserving the Beauty and Quality of Our Environment

President Bush believes that good stewardship of the environment is not just a personal responsibility, it is a public value. Americans are united in the belief that it is important to preserve our natural heritage and safeguard the land around us.

The President has launched initiatives that express this same commitment. His Administration has acted in a comprehensive way to achieve impressive results. By almost every indicator, environmental quality in the United States is improving with cleaner air, water, and land, and improved public health.

The President believes that the federal government has an important role to play in protecting our environment and he has introduced new and innovative policies to achieve these goals. The President favors common-sense approaches to improving the environment while protecting the quality of American life. Over the past two-and-a-half years, the Administration has introduced initiatives that have already begun to deliver significant environmental results for all Americans.

Hydrogen Fuel – A Clean and Secure Energy Future

In his State of the Union address, President Bush announced a $1.2 billion hydrogen fuel initiative to reverse the nation’s growing dependence on foreign oil by developing the technology for hydrogen-powered fuel cells to power cars, trucks, homes and businesses with no pollution or greenhouse gases. The hydrogen fuel initiative will include $720 million in new funding over the next five years to develop the technologies and infrastructure to produce, store, and distribute hydrogen for use in fuel cell vehicles and electricity generation. Combined with the FreedomCAR (Cooperative Automotive Research) initiative, President Bush is proposing a total of $1.7 billion over the next five years to develop hydrogen-powered fuel cells, hydrogen infrastructure and advanced automotive technologies.

Under the President's hydrogen fuel initiative, the first car driven by a child born today could be powered by fuel cells. The hydrogen fuel initiative supplements the President's existing FreedomCAR initiative, which is developing technologies needed for mass production of safe and affordable hydrogen-powered fuel cell vehicles. Through partnerships with the private sector, the hydrogen fuel initiative and FreedomCAR will make it practical and affordable for Americans to choose to use clean, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles by 2020. This will dramatically improve America's energy security by significantly reducing the need for imported oil, as well as help clean our air and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Clear Skies – Clean Air for the 21st Century

Clear Skies, President Bush’s initiative to improve the nation’s air quality, is the most aggressive initiative in American history to cut power plant emissions, as well as a bold new strategy for addressing global climate change. Clear Skies would dramatically improve air quality by cutting power plant emissions of three critical pollutants – sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury – by 70 percent, more than any other presidential clean air initiative. These reductions would be mandatory and would achieve 35 million more tons of reductions from Clear Skies in the next decade than what we could get under business as usual with the current Clean Air Act.

The President’s historic proposal would bring cleaner air to Americans faster, more reliably, and more cost-effectively than under current law. It would save Americans as much as $1 billion annually in compliance costs that are passed along to American consumers, while improving air quality and protecting the reliability and affordability of electricity for consumers. Clear Skies would cut pollution further, faster, cheaper – and with more certainty – eliminating the need for expensive and uncertain litigation as a means of achieving clean air.

Healthy Forests – Safeguarding People, Wildlife and Ecosystems

Last year catastrophic wildfires burned more than 6 million acres of land, killed more than 20 firefighters, destroyed more than 2,000 buildings, and caused severe environmental damage. These catastrophic wildfires destroy everything in their path – people, their property, wildlife habitats, watersheds and entire ecosystems. It can take decades for these forests to recover. For over a century, the federal government has done nothing to eliminate dense undergrowth and ladder fuels, and it has suppressed most of the natural fires that serve to clear out brush and undergrowth. As a result, about 190 million acres of our nation's forests are in bonfire conditions.

The President's Healthy Forests Initiative is returning the nation’s forests to their natural condition by reducing unnecessary regulatory obstacles that hinder active forest management. Healthy Forests will restore forests and rangelands to their natural, healthy, fire-resistant conditions and prevent these catastrophic wildfires to the benefit of communities, wildlife habitat and the landscape.

Brownfields Cleanup - Revitalizing Abandoned Sites in Our Cities and Towns

American cities have many such eyesores -- anywhere from 500,000 to a million brownfields are across our nation. These areas once supported manufacturing and commerce, and now lie empty -- adding nothing of value to the community, and sometimes only causing problems. Fulfilling an important campaign pledge, the President signed historic bipartisan brownfields reform legislation in January 2002. President Bush is committed to accelerating the cleanup and redevelopment of contaminated, underutilized industrial sites. The revitalization of brownfields serves to improve the environment, protect public health, create jobs, and revitalize communities. The President’s FY04 budget proposal provides $211 million – almost 130 percent more than when President Bush took office – for EPA’s brownfields cleanup program.

The President’s Farm Bill – Helping America’s Farmers Conserve Their Land

The Administration believes that there are no better stewards of the land than people who rely on the productivity of the land. The President continues to implement a farm bill that enhances conservation and environmental stewardship. The legislation will greatly enhance the ability of America’s farmers and ranchers to protect wetlands, water quality, and wildlife habitat.

To help them live up to the newer and higher environmental standards, the President’s farm bill expands the ECP program, which provides financial assistance to our farmers and ranchers to encourage sound conservation. The farm bill will provide over $40 billion over the next decade in funds for conservation programs that will restore millions of acres of wetlands, conserve water, and improve streams and rivers.

Diesel Regulations – Tackling Emissions for Cleaner Air

The Administration has aggressively tackled diesel emissions with modern regulations – a new mandate on oil producers to reduce the sulfur in diesel fuel, an innovative program requiring cleaner diesel engines on new trucks, an initiative to cut diesel pollution from aging school bus fleets, and new rules to reduce emissions from non-road vehicles.

The President’s non-road diesel regulation has been widely praised by environmental groups, with some hailing it as providing potentially the greatest health benefits since lead was removed from gasoline some 20 years ago.

Global Environment – Meeting the Challenge of Global Climate Change

President Bush has committed America to an aggressive strategy to meet the challenge of long-term global climate change by reducing the greenhouse gas intensity of our economy by 18 percent over the next 10 years. The Administration’s climate change policy is science-based; it encourages research breakthroughs that lead to technological innovation; and it takes advantage of the power of markets. It will encourage global participation and will pursue actions that will help ensure continued economic growth and prosperity for our citizens and for citizens throughout the world.

This goal is supported by a broad range of domestic and international climate change initiatives, including $4.4 billion in FY04 for climate change. This includes a significant investment of $1.75 billion in climate change science research to address critical gaps of understanding our global climate system and over $500 million in tax incentives to improve energy efficiency and promote renewable energy in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Our Oceans – Improving Ocean Conservation in the National Park System

The National Park Service has begun restoring marine ecosystems in close cooperation with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and state and local governments. New management tools, including networks of marine reserves and natural area research have been established to restore coral reefs, kelp forests and their diverse communities of marine life.

The President’s Budget – Funding Conservation for Today and Tomorrow

At $44.9 billion, the President’s FY04 environment and natural resources budget request is the highest ever. The Budget funds the nation’s priorities of protecting our drinking water, reducing pollution, cleaning up industrial waste sites, protecting our national parks and refuges, and helping farmers conserve on private lands as well.

The President’s budget proposal includes a $10 million increase for EPA from FY03 to strengthen EPA’s core operating programs for air, water, land and enforcement activities. The budget also includes $3.9 billion for the U.S. Department of Agriculture for farm conservation funding, over $500 million more than last year, and $4.4 billion for federal climate-related programs, a commitment unmatched by any other nation.

A Commitment to Protect our Environment

President Bush and his Administration are building on 30 years of successful environmental improvements. Our air is cleaner, our drinking water is purer, and our land is better protected.

There is a growing consensus in America in favor of common-sense approaches to improving the environment while protecting the quality of American life. The Bush Administration will continue to pursue the President’s comprehensive environmental agenda and provide the public and private resources needed to make new investments in environmental technologies and conservation.

Americans understand their obligation to the environment more so than in the years past. Americans understand that good stewardship is a personal responsibility, and a public value. The President believes that it is important for Americans to understand that each of us have a responsibility, and that it's a part of our value system in our country to assume that responsibility.

Link: http://www.georgewbush.com/Environment/Brief.aspx
9 posted on 04/03/2004 3:03:56 AM PST by Reader of news
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
60 influential scientists, including 20 Nobel laureates

We all know what you have to kiss to get a Nobel prize.

The "Liberals 'R' Us Foundation" passes them out only to certified lefties like Jimmy Carter, et al.

10 posted on 04/03/2004 4:21:56 AM PST by capt. norm (If two wrongs don't make a right, try three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya's fan
That's terrific; thanks so much for posting this!
11 posted on 04/03/2004 5:16:18 AM PST by alwaysconservative (Annoy liberals: buy conservative books and hire conservatives looking for work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: alwaysconservative
You're welcome!
12 posted on 04/03/2004 5:30:08 AM PST by Reader of news
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dubya's fan
I've always said that the Republicans are the real stewards of our environment; we actually do things to clean up our world as opposed to trashing SUV dealerships, protesting for KYOTO, and starting fires, AND we do it based on facts, not junk science.

One of my all-time favorite books is "The Skeptical Environmentalist" by Lomborg. Not every book has the endorsement of a co-founder of Greenpeace who admits that the left uses junk science for political purposes, LOL!
13 posted on 04/03/2004 5:40:37 AM PST by alwaysconservative (Annoy liberals: buy conservative books and hire conservatives looking for work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
No one has worked harder to distort and politicize science than the union of concerned scientists under its new leader Kurt Gottfried. He was an exceptionally talented scientist who has become a whore to the left wing.

"I think the average age of those who signed the letter is well over 60," Dr. Gottfried said

Which means that they are unregenerate hippies of the 1960's

14 posted on 04/03/2004 6:04:50 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
ping
15 posted on 04/03/2004 7:16:27 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"I think the average age of those who signed the letter is well over 60," Dr. Gottfried said. And there's another reason to doubt this letter, as most scientists over sixty had their politics molded during either the so-called "McCarthy Era" or the campus upheavals of the sixties, and hence, tend to lean more heavily to the left. I don't know of any comprehensive survey of the political leanings of the science community which takes into account age differences, but the majority of scientists on FR appear to be under fifty.
16 posted on 04/03/2004 8:45:27 AM PST by RightWingAtheist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
17 posted on 04/03/2004 8:54:55 AM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Here's an incisive and informed commentary by engineer and writer Will McCarthy on how partisan political lobbying can be damaging to science in the long run:
http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue307/labnotes.html
18 posted on 04/03/2004 8:55:00 AM PST by RightWingAtheist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"The report was endorsed by 60 influential Marxist scientists, including 20 Nobel Marxist laureates and Marxists who had served in past Republican administrations."
19 posted on 04/03/2004 8:57:38 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!
20 posted on 04/03/2004 9:03:19 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson