Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Bombshell: KERRY not validly married?] MEDIA INTEREST IN KERRY’S CATHOLICISM GROWS
Catholic League ^ | April 2, 2004 | William Donohue

Posted on 04/02/2004 11:15:30 PM PST by Notwithstanding

Catholic League president William Donohue commented as follows:

“The Catholic League does not possess a theological micrometer that judges, with digital precision, how ‘good’ a Catholic is. Furthermore, it is not our business anyway. But it is also true that we will not pretend disinterest in subjects that touch on the issue of Catholics in public life.

“This week’s issue of Time magazine says Senator John Kerry ‘sought an annulment of his 18-year first marriage before marrying again.’ News reports indicate, however, that Kerry didn’t seek an annulment until after he married Teresa Heinz in a civil ceremony in 1995. Today’s New York Times says Kerry ‘sought an annulment from the church when he was divorced from his first wife.’ Notice that neither Time nor the New York Times says that an annulment was granted. They say it was ‘sought.’

“Kerry cannot claim that this is a private matter since he publicly joked about his quest for an annulment on the Don Imus show of May 8, 1997. ‘Seventy-five percent of all annulments in the world take place in the United States,’ Kerry said, ‘and I guess the figure drops to 50 percent if you take out all Massachusetts politicians.’ He continued saying, ‘It’s one of those special Catholic things. It’s like confession or feeling guilty about things you haven’t even thought of doing.’

“On February 16, 2004, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that ‘Kerry’s office didn’t respond to several e-mail and telephone requests’ regarding the question of whether an annulment was granted. On March 23, 2003, the Providence Journal-Bulletin said that Kerry ‘will not say whether he obtained an annulment of his first marriage….’ Why the reticence, especially since Kerry says his ‘current marriage is in good graces with the church?’

“Why does this matter? If Kerry did not receive an annulment, then he is not married in the Catholic Church and cannot receive the sacraments. But even if he was annulled, did he and Teresa Heinz get married in the Catholic Church following the annulment? If not, then Kerry is not married in the Church, thus raising all sorts of questions.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; annulment; catholicchurch; catholicpoliticians; galante; kerry; kerryandgod; teresaheinz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181 next last
To: kcvl
Past media reports did not indicate the grounds on which Kerry sought to annul his marriage of 18 years, after it produced two children, and the campaign also declined to provide any explanation.

Any large donations from Heinz-Kerry to the church about that time?

121 posted on 04/03/2004 8:22:39 AM PST by CedarDave (Kerry loves daylight savings time: He can set his clocks forward, then change them back in 7 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: White Eagle
Sadly, except for a lot of wonderful Catholics I know, I think you're right.

What I don't understand is the number of "good" Catholics who support the democrat agenda of abortion and gay marriage. If I was running for office and supported abortion and gay marriage, the Evangelical church I belong to would tell me to take a hike; guaranteed! In fact, my church is full of "former" Catholics.
122 posted on 04/03/2004 8:22:43 AM PST by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: maica; Freee-dame
ping
123 posted on 04/03/2004 8:26:08 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Oh yeah, but he's better than us.
He's "enlightened."
He doesn't bring his Church into politics.
Oh no, his is a higher calling.
He's not running for Pope.
He merely wants to destroy the US he loathes.



124 posted on 04/03/2004 8:37:03 AM PST by onyx (Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: nmh
It's INSANE to even suggest that ANYONE can ANNUL a marriage after EIGHTEEN YEARS! I don't care what religion the person claims to be!

Exactly!

But since they live in Massachusetts, can't Kerry and Tereeeeesa claim to have a civil union? They could even be the poster couple! LOL

125 posted on 04/03/2004 8:46:56 AM PST by bcoffey (There are 10 types of people: those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Conservative til I die
Hey Mr. Sensitive. I will criticize Kerry. He is a slime. There--happy now?

Bu the way, the person who said that annulments were corrupt was Father Tom Doyle. Take it up with him.

126 posted on 04/03/2004 9:00:57 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Most of those plane crashes were probably accidents. There's not much doubt that the Ron Brown crash was a case of Arkencide. And a couple of others are suspicious, although I haven't seen as much convincing detail on any of them as in the case of Ron Brown.

There's no doubt that the clintons had Brown murdered, along with all the other passengers on the plane. The evidence is overwhelming.
127 posted on 04/03/2004 9:07:22 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: sobieski
"you're catholic by the precepts you follow, not which rituals or what you did at 10"

I'm not a Catholic, but I believe the same way about being a Christian.

Clinton and Bush show the extremes. Clinton "claimed" to be a Christian, and made a show of walking around with a big Bible while going in and out of church, while his lifestyle betrayed those actions. He drank, did drugs, womanized, cheated, lied, etc. His claims of being a Christian were a joke to the public.

Bush, on the otherhand has rarely been seen with a Bible in his hand, but Bush's actions (and signature to legislation), and his lifestyle, show respect for the Biblical principles he believes in.

You're right that Kerry cannot claim to be a Catholic and then act like the church has no right to expect him to live by their tenants. And .. I believe he should have taken a clue from Clinton's actions - and not repeat them - because the public knew it was phoney. Evidently, Kerry doesn't believe the "little people" can figure that out.

By your comments, I'm glad to see the public already gets it.
128 posted on 04/03/2004 9:18:21 AM PST by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
No, the children are never excluded from the sacraments. There is no concept of illegitimacy in the Church. The baptismal certificate, in the line that says "father," bears the word "ignominium," which means the father's name is not known (thus the word "ignominious").
129 posted on 04/03/2004 9:20:38 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jocon307; zarf
"Maybe if Kerry murders someone with a chain saw...." ~ zarf

Uh, yeah, that'll do it. But he'll deny it, you just know he will. ~ jocon307

Nope. He'll say he did it, before he didn't do it...

130 posted on 04/03/2004 9:30:07 AM PST by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
This has been beat to death on a couple of other threads.

What no one has been able to ascertain with any degree of certainty is whether the 1995 wedding on Nantucket under a canopy in the yard of her home and not in a catholic church or chapel was indeed merely a civil ceremony or was sanctioned by the church and Donohue hasn't pursued it far enough.

To the average voter, this is a nonissue, but I think a person who blithely plays fast and loose with his church teachings may carry the same attitude into his presidency, if elected. It is indicative of whether he will respect the laws governing our country or concentrate on finding ways around those he finds distasteful. Which is an issue. An important issue.

131 posted on 04/03/2004 9:34:17 AM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Kerry eventually received the annulment from the Boston diocese despite Thorne’s vehement objections.

That was a story that somebody put out and a lot of other people picked up and ran with. But apparently there is no proof of it?

132 posted on 04/03/2004 10:04:23 AM PST by JohnnyZ (Got some dirt on my shoulder -- could you brush it off for me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
If Kerry didn't get his marriage to Tuh-Ray-Zaa blessed by the Catholic Church, then, in the eyes of the Church, he is not validly married and is living in adultery and cannot receive Communion.
133 posted on 04/03/2004 10:29:27 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
If I was running for office and supported abortion and gay marriage.... What about divorce? Most evangelicals I know take divorce lightly. The problem with annulments in the Catholic Church is that they amount to an easy acceptance of divorce
134 posted on 04/03/2004 10:41:24 AM PST by RobbyS (JMJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: pbear8; BurbankKarl
I believe, however, that what BurbankKarl describes was the practice at one time. When we attended a class prior to the christening of our first child, one issue the pastor addressed was whether the parents were married in the church. He noted that "at one time," if the parents weren't married in the church, the child would not be christened. Of course that is no longer the case, but I've been surprised by how many people have posted questions/comments as to whether annulment makes children of a marriage illegitimate (the church clearly states that it does not).
135 posted on 04/03/2004 11:29:43 AM PST by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
Well shame on the Brothers of the Holy Cross! Sheesh...

136 posted on 04/03/2004 11:38:55 AM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
"a big no no"

And .. since when did that stop the dems from doing exactly what they want, regardless of whether it was unethical or illegal.
137 posted on 04/03/2004 11:47:28 AM PST by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Comment #138 Removed by Moderator

To: pbear8
The children of annulled marriages are seen as innocent victims

Perhaps there is some confusion with the dispensation required for a boy who was illegitimate who wants to become a priest. Many centuries ago it was fairly common for priests to have children - although they weren't married. The church became concerned that the church assets would be passed on to these children and a number of laws/rules were instituted to protect those assets.

139 posted on 04/03/2004 12:00:44 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: daybreakcoming
Is all it took was money there would never have been the break-away Church of England founded by the extremely wealthy Henry VIII - he of the many wives.
140 posted on 04/03/2004 12:40:48 PM PST by Notwithstanding (Good parents don't let their kids attend public school or watch most TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson