Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nader Blasts 'Hot Air America'
Newsmax ^ | 4/2/04

Posted on 04/02/2004 9:51:22 AM PST by areafiftyone

Things turned ugly on the new liberal talk radio network "Air America" Wednesday night, with guest Ralph Nader blasting the Democratic Party's counterweight to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly as "Hot Air America." The perennial candidate said the fact that Democrats couldn't hang onto what he described as their presidential victory was the party's own fault.

And for good measure, Nader blasted ex-President Clinton as "a draft dodger."

It was all downhill from there, as Nader and Rhodes screamed at one another for the next ten minutes.

Some selected highlights, as transcribed by the Web site "The Daily Kos":

On Clinton

RHODES: You know the Democrat's policy, you know when the Republicans talk about regime change was the Clinton administration's policy, but it was regime change from within. It was never military action on our part on Iraq. That was not the policy . . .

NADER: . . . You know, Clinton was a draft-dodger so he wasn't willing to take on the Pentagon. And he wasn't willing to take on the Congress on many huge military expenditures and that starved many of the necessities back home among the American people --

On Nader's Presidential run

RHODES: How many ways to Sunday do I have to tell you. We can't afford you.

NADER: I'm sorry, Can you afford freedom? Can you afford choice? Can you afford civil liberties? --

RHODES: Gimmie a Democrat President!

On "Hot Air America"

NADER: -- can you -- is this the way you want to start Air America? You want it to be Hot Air America?

RHODES: Oh, no, you see --

NADER: -- Log on to the web site votenader.org --

RHODES: -- Ralph, let me tell you something. If you did get to be president, tell me who you would caucus with. Tell me who you could get to vote for your ... views and visions, and your, your bills! Who is an independent other than Bernie Sanders and Jim Jeffords? Who are you gonna count on? You -- let's say you win. Okay?

NADER: You can't win without a huge mobilization of voters --

RHODES: -- let's say ya do --

NADER: -- that would replace many members of Congress.

RHODES: -- let's say it's seventy years old, from your house in Connecticut, your little house --

NADER: -- now wait a minute. now wait wait wait. You're --

RHODES: -- you are, you are ready to do this.

NADER: -- listen, listen. Now you're getting nasty.

RHODES: I'm not!

NADER: You are ruining the first day --

RHODES: I'm not ruining anything.

NADER: -- the first day of Air America.

RHODES: This is Air America.

NADER: -- you're not letting your, you're not letting your guest be, have a chance to speak. You're --

RHODES: I asked you a question. --

NADER: -- you're not letting your guest have a chance to speak.

More bickering

NADER: -- you've got a very bad interviewing technique --

RHODES: -- uh uh uh. I am not --

NADER: -- and you're not going to get an audience by overtalking --

RHODES: -- interviewing you --

NADER: Do not overtalk!

RHODES: I am not ... interviewing you!

NADER: Do not overtalk!

RHODES: I mad at you! Don't you understand the difference?

NADER: Fine, just close up and start screaming to your audience.

RHODES: [laughs] Look. Don't tell me how to do radio; I've done it for twenty years. You screwed up the last election, and now you want to screw up this one, and I'm pissed!

NADER: (pause; speechless) You know, you ought to be ashamed of yourself because you --

RHODES: But I'm not! You know you should --

NADER: -- you agree with me --

RHODES: -- be ashamed of yourself! --

NADER: -- you agree with me on so many issues. You really ought to be ashamed of yourself.

RHODES: I'm not ashamed of myself. I can't afford you! [End of Excerpts]


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; liberaltalkradio; nader; transcript
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Badeye
I would love it if someone would call in and say "wow, this your most creative way to get around CFR yet".
41 posted on 04/02/2004 12:15:31 PM PST by CharlieOK1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Ralph Nader is the only Lefty I respect. He has passion and genuine beliefs. That's exactly why the Democrats hate him. He does too good a job of identifying them and the fact their candidate stands for *nothing.* And a lot of liberals in their guts, know Nader's right.
42 posted on 04/02/2004 12:20:33 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Your post assumes that their "agenda" is what they are actually fighting for.

This little exchange puts the lie to that assumption.

They are after POWER - all else is second. As a matter of fact, their "agenda" is only a vehicle to their quest for power.
43 posted on 04/02/2004 12:23:09 PM PST by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mlbford2
Yeah, it's bad.

And I saw one of the founders on a news piece the other night, the reporter asked him, "How will you know if you've succeeded here with Air America?" His answer? "This November." There was an awkward pause, then the reporter asked, "This November?" And the co-founder said, "After the elections this November."

This is a radio station people!

Ratings success and eventually turning the ratings success into revenue generation should be the ultimate goal, but these guys have put this thing together for the sole purpose of throwing an election.

I have some bad news for them. Even Rush Limbaugh, with 600+ stations and his long term relationship with 12-20 million listeners couldn't stop Bill Clinton from being elected in 1992 or from being reelected in 1996. Yes, talk radio is powerful, it may have made the difference in 2000, but Air America is not going to have even a microscopic effect on the elections in Nov. I assure you.

44 posted on 04/02/2004 5:29:28 PM PST by ElephantMan (sorry, no smart a$$ tag line today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ElephantMan
Oh, and anybody think it's telling that Al Frnaken's cohost comes from Minnesota Public Radio?

Wait a minute...an extremely partisan hardcore leftist coming from Public Radio? How bizarre!

45 posted on 04/02/2004 5:30:51 PM PST by ElephantMan (sorry, no smart a$$ tag line today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: not-alone
Last night Randi had her facts wrong, as usual, and won't let anyone correct her. Lots of criticism on DU

??

Since when do the scumbags, any of them, care about "facts"?

46 posted on 04/02/2004 5:37:46 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ElephantMan

Al Franken on Hot Air America

47 posted on 04/02/2004 5:43:09 PM PST by ElephantMan (sorry, no smart a$$ tag line today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ElephantMan

Janene Garafalo on Hot Air America

48 posted on 04/02/2004 5:43:47 PM PST by ElephantMan (sorry, no smart a$$ tag line today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ElephantMan

Chuck D on Hot Air America

49 posted on 04/02/2004 5:44:38 PM PST by ElephantMan (sorry, no smart a$$ tag line today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: abner
Hot air ping.


50 posted on 04/02/2004 6:06:59 PM PST by Nick Danger (make a date today to see the USA, and see it in your Chev-ro-let.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Come on Nick, that is insulting. Just like calling TereZa Teri.

:-)
51 posted on 04/02/2004 11:08:56 PM PST by abner (FREE THE MIRANDA MEMOS! http://www.intelmemo.com or http://www.wintersoldier.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Sweet!
52 posted on 04/02/2004 11:30:56 PM PST by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Great graphic.
53 posted on 04/02/2004 11:34:07 PM PST by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Wow, Nader actually has some good points.

Look, Kerry and Nader just had a big pow-wow on how to defeat Bush. Now if Nader and Kerry have the same goal then why is Nader still in the race? It makes no sense unless they have decided to turn a Nader into a viable "libertarian/conservative" alternative 3rd party candidate. The best way to do that is to get every liberal in the country furious at Nader and to make some conservatives such as you start saying "he has some good points". It may not work so all Nader has to do is later withdraw and throw his support to Kerry ala Perot.LOL

54 posted on 04/02/2004 11:39:56 PM PST by Texasforever (I can’t kill enough brain cells to become a democrat just by drinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Go Ralph! Go!!!
55 posted on 04/02/2004 11:44:50 PM PST by KOZ. (i'm so bad i should be in detention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: KOZ.
I am not so sure at this point. Why would he be huddling with Kerry for a way to beat Bush when conventional wisdom says he is drawing votes away from Kerry?. It makes no logical sense.
56 posted on 04/02/2004 11:48:32 PM PST by Texasforever (I can’t kill enough brain cells to become a democrat just by drinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
you said that kerry and nader just had a big pow-wow, when did that happen? didnt hear about it.

i dont know what is goin on, but if your suspicions are right then i would have to agree with you.

57 posted on 04/03/2004 9:45:59 AM PST by KOZ. (i'm so bad i should be in detention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: All
Don't forget to log your prediction in the "Airbag America" DEAD POOL!
58 posted on 04/03/2004 11:35:51 AM PST by Bob J (freerepublic.net/ radiofreerepublic.com/rightalk.com...check them out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I tuned into that show totally by accident(I thought Randy Rhodes was Ozzy Osbourne's late lamented guitar player, btw?) and I couldn't *believe* my ears! The thing that struck me the most was that this snarling b***h had so little *respect* for this guy who's running for President. She - or, rather, *it* - acted it was her personal responsibility to convince Nader that he shouldn't run, and not only that, but it was his duty to listen to her and take her advice!

It was just beyond belief. With all I know about the self-centered arrogance of Lieberals it was *still* just unbelievable. As someone else said, Ralph would have gotten a better hearing out of Limbaugh, or Hannity, or *any* conservative host, for that matter (and I think he knows it... Ralph may have had a *real* epiphany out of that experience.) (But nothing in the preceding should, of course, be in any way construed to imply that I don't think Nader is a socialist scumbag who should be hung from the nearest lamppost - I just think there should be a little *decorum* maintained during the hanging ceremony, OK? Is that too much to ask?? Even of a Lieberal??? Even if they're doing it for the wrong reason???? NO?????)

59 posted on 04/05/2004 12:55:58 AM PDT by fire_eye (Socialism is the opiate of academia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson