Posted on 04/01/2004 7:18:11 PM PST by Nasty McPhilthy
Define the New American
My barber has a subscription to The New American and about twice a month, as I sit in his shop waiting for a haircut, I pick up the latest issue and read what I consider to be some of the most in depth journalism available. Their knack for covering the major issues from angles that other sources seem to miss is refreshing.
I dont mean to imply that I am in agreement with each and every aspect of the coverage, but, at the same time, I do feel that they strive to call the shots with a certain fairness not found in most of the better known publications.
They are critical of both parties in such a way that I find myself reading with glee their opposition to Democrats and the Liberal Agenda while taking exception to what appears to be an equal dislike of the present administration.
The greatest enjoyment I receive from reading their publication comes from the articles on Americas founding fathers. I have no doubt that these pieces are well researched and factual and that they portray the leaders that shaped this great country in a light that cant be found in the nations leading universities.
Maybe the second best thing about The New American is that they seem to bare the same, if not to a greater degree, disdain of the UN as I do. Some of the most critical comments on the World Body that I have ever read were contained between the covers of the New American.
Heres hoping that others more familiar with their background and views than myself will take the time to reply to this post and help me understand something thats been bothering me for a little while now. That being; just who would they support for President?
Prove it.
The "Hollywood-Sound Stage-Jerkweeds" are a CLASSIC EXAMPLE of the "Intellectually Constipated" Leftist Paranoids who STILL "Dominate" a portion of the "Intellectually Lazy Semi-Educated" now employed by some of the "Left-Media."
Fortunately, the Internet, some "Talk Radio," &--as a result of the "above,"--Fox News, have been able to present, "The Other Side."
Our "National Debate" has become a BIT "More Balanced."
DESPITE the claims of the "SCREAMING CRAZIES of the LEFT," we DID "Go to the Moon--Several Times."
& DESPITE the UNPARALLELED VITRIOL of the "LEFTMEDIA," "W" has REDUCED "AL_QUEDA" to a "Nub," & is RAPIDLY Deystroying it & it's "Metastases" around the world.
John KERRY is from my "Home State," & I would be PROUD to have "One of Ours" as President.
There SHOULD HAVE BEEN a better way for Mr Kerry to voice his objections to Vietnam.
In MANY WAYS, Mr Kerry "Went Over the Line" in his opposition to official US Policy.
His "Testimony" CLEARLY Betrayed & Denigrated his fellow Soldiers--Many of whom served FAR LONGER than He.
There is AMPLE EVIDENCE that he "Gave Aid & Comfort to our Enemies (see the Statements & Memoirs of the North Vietnamese).
Mr Kerry is NOT FIT to be our President--EVER.
IMHO
Doc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.