Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condi’s Moment
national review online ^ | March 31, 2004 | Mark Goldblatt

Posted on 03/31/2004 8:45:07 AM PST by ride the whirlwind

The archetypal liberal is the guy who, every morning, drops a dollar in the lap of the homeless man camped out in front of his apartment building and who, every evening, blames conservatives for the fact that there's a homeless man camped out in front of his apartment building. In other words, liberals don't think things through; they opt for gestures, knee-jerk reactions that feel good, without the slightest consideration of long-term consequences.

Such was the case in their demand that National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice testify, under oath and in public, before the 9/11 Commission. Now their demand has been met. Testify she will, even though there's no compelling reason for her to do so; indeed, she's already testified — albeit not under oath — for four hours in private session before the commission. There's not a shred of evidence she lied.

Even in the wake of former counterterrorism adviser Richard Clarke's damaging charges that the Bush administration was asleep at the wheel before September 11, 2001, the White House was reluctant to let Rice testify publicly under oath because of the dual principles of executive privilege and separation of powers; if Rice's testimony creates a precedent for presidential advisers being summoned to appear before legislative committees, then future advisers might become less likely to provide presidents with frank and forthright counsel.

The liberals insisting Rice testify thought nothing of such principles. They knew only that Bush was against it, so they were for it. Whatever it takes, as long as they were sticking it to the president.

Now the liberals will get their wish: Dr. Rice will tell her side of the story, under oath, in public. And with the suspense that's already gathering around her appearance, it will be a hit. The rest of the nation will soon discover what careful observers of the Bush's inner circle already know: Rice is the most poised, articulate, and convincing speaker in the entire administration. She will mop up the floor with Clarke.

Want a "for example"? In his tell-all book, Clarke asserts that the first time he mentioned al Qaeda to Rice, in January 2001, "her facial expression gave me the impression that she had never heard the term before." Except in October 2000, Rice gave a radio interview in which she discussed al Qaeda. So much for facial expressions.

Not only will Rice make short work of Clarke, she will emerge from the hearing with conservatives flinging themselves at her feet, begging her to run for president in 2008. (There's already a website devoted to her potential candidacy even though she's said, on multiple occasions, she has no interest in the office.) And it would serve liberals right if she did decide to run, for Rice would be their worst nightmare. She would win the women's vote outright, peel away half the black vote, and set back the Democratic party for a generation.

But that's not the kind of thing liberals concern themselves with. Right now, they got her to testify. They stuck it to Bush.

It sure must feel good.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News
KEYWORDS: 911commission; condi; condoleezzarice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
Author certainly has a high opinion of our Condi!
1 posted on 03/31/2004 8:45:08 AM PST by ride the whirlwind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind

2 posted on 03/31/2004 8:50:18 AM PST by Eala (Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
Setting expectations too high is another way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory...
3 posted on 03/31/2004 8:51:41 AM PST by Eala (Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
I wonder if the media will cover or report on her testimony? What if there is a big rainstorm somewhere that day.
4 posted on 03/31/2004 8:52:40 AM PST by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Eala
Air of caution duly noted. That said, I hope she kicks butt!
6 posted on 03/31/2004 8:54:03 AM PST by ride the whirlwind (GOP - grace over pressure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eala
Right. Lowered expectations are better. If dems think Condi is going to go down with a whimper, they will tune in with popcorn to watch. Indys will watch out of curiosity. I do hope she blows them away with her seriousness.
7 posted on 03/31/2004 8:57:41 AM PST by cajungirl (<i>swing low, sweet limousine, comin' fer to Kerry me hoooommmee</i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
Except in October 2000, Rice gave a radio interview in which she discussed al Qaeda. So much for facial expressions.

Actually, I think she mentioned bin Laden, rather than al Qaeda.

8 posted on 03/31/2004 9:00:44 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eala

9 posted on 03/31/2004 9:00:55 AM PST by So Cal Rocket (If consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, John F. Kerry’s mind must be freaking enormous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
Condi in 2008.
10 posted on 03/31/2004 9:00:55 AM PST by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid
The only thing the media will show will be the grandstanding speeches of the leftists.
11 posted on 03/31/2004 9:01:00 AM PST by FormerLib (Feja e shqiptarit eshte terorizm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
Rice will mop the floor with the liberals... She is without question one of the most articulate, informed, intelligent and dedicated persons in Washington today.

To think that a handful of race baiting, poverty pimping, pander to any group to win re-election liberal congressmen will do anything but show themselves for the shills they are by trying to "get" Rice is laughable.

I know Condi does not seek the job of the President, however, if she smokes them today, which I fully do expect. She will set the stage undoubtably for her to be not only the first female, but also the first african american president as well if she desires to take it.

12 posted on 03/31/2004 9:04:43 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid
I wonder if the media will cover or report on her testimony?

Fox News will cover it. Probably they will cover it gavel to gavel on the day she is testifying. David Asman of Fox News made mention that their ratings have been huge for the 911 commission.

CNN and MSNBC on the other hand will probably ignore it. But since they have lost half their audiences anyway, will anyone actually notice?
13 posted on 03/31/2004 9:07:19 AM PST by Republican Red ("I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tax Government
Let the Google-Bombing commence:

Presidential Material

Our Next President

14 posted on 03/31/2004 9:09:04 AM PST by Grit (www.NRSC.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
Rice would be their worst nightmare. She would win the women's vote outright, peel away half the black vote, and set back the Democratic party for a generation.

THIS is the "stake through the heart" that I've been looking for.

It isn't safe to vote for a party with true Constitutional principles until the DemRats are no longer a threat.

15 posted on 03/31/2004 9:10:57 AM PST by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Actually, I think she mentioned bin Laden, rather than al Qaeda.

Actually, THAT'S A DEM/LEFTIST TALKING POINT.

16 posted on 03/31/2004 9:12:13 AM PST by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
Yes, just like when she became the first female, minority, youngest (38) provost at Stanford.
17 posted on 03/31/2004 9:12:23 AM PST by ride the whirlwind (GOP - grace over pressure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
Doctor Condoleeza Rice, a beautiful intelligent conservative powerful black woman.

Bring it on!

18 posted on 03/31/2004 9:17:56 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Leave Pat Leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
What you said was a non sequiter.
19 posted on 03/31/2004 9:18:55 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MrB
What you said was a non sequiter.
20 posted on 03/31/2004 9:18:55 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson