Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clarke's colleagues say he's lost credibility
Insight Mag via World Net Daily ^ | March 30, 2004 | J. Michael Waller

Posted on 03/30/2004 3:29:11 PM PST by Conservative Coulter Fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Wolfowitz vs. Clarke: The deputy defense secretary on Richard Clarke’s “creative memory.”

Which one is it, Mr. Clarke?" CARTOON with, yup, Richard Clarke by Linda Eddy

Clarke then . . ./. . . and Clarke now

On Richard Clarke (Two examples of how Clarke hindered the War on Terrorism)

1 posted on 03/30/2004 3:29:12 PM PST by Conservative Coulter Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
For months, Levin personally had held up the confirmation hearings of Bush's appointees who were to design the U.S. antiterrorism strategy – Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas J. Feith, Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Programs J.D. Crouch and Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs Peter W. Rodman – refusing for apparently partisan purposes to allow them to take office until late July 2001.

While Levin was holding up their appointments, the incoming Pentagon policy team had no legal or political authority to do their vital jobs

This needs to be brought up again and again

2 posted on 03/30/2004 3:35:22 PM PST by scarface367 (This tagline will work for food, money, or large weapons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Ya think???

Of course he's been discredited!!!

By publishing his drive-by book in campaign time, he's dug his own grave in the intelligence community.
3 posted on 03/30/2004 3:38:46 PM PST by El Conservador ("No blood for oil!"... Then don't drive, you moron!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
He implies he voted Republican in 2000.

Actually, Clarke admitted that he voted for McCain and then for Al Gore in 2000.

4 posted on 03/30/2004 3:40:11 PM PST by John Thornton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Thornton
Maybe he is trying to be Kerry's running; he's trying to prove that he can be just as "flexible" as John Effing Kerry is in his statements.
5 posted on 03/30/2004 3:45:37 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Communism failed because people like to own stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Yes, President Bush handled it so badly that Al-Qaeda's puported operations chief Khalid Shiekh Mohammed, now in detention, said that the US response disrupted the terrorist organisations' plans so thoroughly that it could not proceed.

Source.

I can't imagine what would have happened if Gore had been in his place. I shudder to think of it--or of Kerry sitting there.

6 posted on 03/30/2004 3:46:38 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I can't imagine what would have happened if Gore had been in his place. I shudder to think of it--or of Kerry sitting there.

That reminds me of what Saddam's evil spawn said about President Bush: something to the effect that he wasn't passive like Bill Clinton.

7 posted on 03/30/2004 3:54:13 PM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John Thornton
According to opensecrets.org, Clarke has given to the Democrats for the past 10 years.
8 posted on 03/30/2004 4:23:35 PM PST by shamusotoole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Gore would be in front of the UN demanding that "Afghanistan must hand over OBL, or else. Really, I mean it this time."
9 posted on 03/30/2004 4:27:08 PM PST by Jeeper (Virginia is for Jeeper's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scarface367; Mrs Zip; BOBWADE
For months, Levin personally had held up the confirmation hearings of Bush's appointees who were to design the U.S. antiterrorism strategy – Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas J. Feith, Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Programs J.D. Crouch and Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs Peter W. Rodman – refusing for apparently partisan purposes to allow them to take office until late July 2001. While Levin was holding up their appointments, the incoming Pentagon policy team had no legal or political authority to do their vital jobs

This needs to be brought up again and again

2 posted on 03/30/2004 5:35:22 PM CST by scarface367 (This tagline will work for food, money, or large weapons)

I had just highlighted the same comments when I noticed you had already posted them so....here they are again. Keep bring it up until people understand the truth laid out here.

10 posted on 03/30/2004 4:40:03 PM PST by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Thanks for the post. Connects more dots to the enemies within.
11 posted on 03/30/2004 4:49:03 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scarface367
For months, Levin personally had held up the confirmation hearings of Bush's appointees who were to design the U.S. antiterrorism strategy – Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas J. Feith, Assistant Secretary of "Defense for International Security Programs J.D. Crouch and Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs Peter W. Rodman – refusing for apparently partisan purposes to allow them to take office until late July 2001."

"While Levin was holding up their appointments, the incoming Pentagon policy team had no legal or political authority to do their vital jobs"

"This needs to be brought up again and again"

Bump!!

Beginning December 12, 2000, the Clinton administration did everything they could to impede the transition to the Bush administration and the Democrats continued to drag their feet, hold up nominations and act childish. Someone also should point out that the Director of the FBI was not confirmed until August 2, 2001.
12 posted on 03/30/2004 4:50:29 PM PST by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeeper
Gore would be in front of the UN......

And President Nader would be at the Hague filing a class action suite against Osama.

13 posted on 03/30/2004 4:58:04 PM PST by tbpiper (Proud Dad of a 101st Screamin' Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Very cheap hit on Pete Verga. Pete is a real pro who served Reagan and every admin since. One of the best SES people I know of. Highly regarded by the uniformed folks as a square shooter. The unwarranted hit on Verga undermines the rest of the article severely. Though I am sure it has some other points that are valid.
14 posted on 03/30/2004 5:06:13 PM PST by redwolf00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
That post should be copied and sent to Hannity, Rush and O'Reilly. It goes to the heart of why the Bush Admin. was having difficulty in the early days. The dims have impeded every action the President has attempted. It's a miracle that he has managed to do anything at all.
15 posted on 03/30/2004 5:45:56 PM PST by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: John Thornton
What was appalling about the way he tried to convey the 2000 Republican vote was we freepers watching him testify live accurately parsed out what he had just said, yet we had to endure ABC radio news and Norah O'Donnell to be specific, and countless other reporters, screw up and say things like "He testified he's a Republican" or "He voted for George Bush".

Why just yesterday some lib caller to Rush said the latter and Rush knew to correct him that Clarke voted Gore in the general, but even Rush thought Clarke voted Bush in the primary when it was McCain.

Ack

16 posted on 03/30/2004 6:35:23 PM PST by cyncooper ("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: scarface367
Regarding your very correct comment about Karl Lenin "This needs to be brought up again and again.

It seems to be like swimming upstream to try to stick any of his many hateful attributes to Karl Lenin. The voters of Michigan have elected him to 4 or 5 (6) year terms, and will probably do so again. This is just such a damn dirty shame. Trying to get any of the major newspapers in Michigan, which are all left wing, to follow up on this ba$tard is like pulling teeth.

17 posted on 03/30/2004 6:43:36 PM PST by RushLake (Permission from the UN...we don't need no stinking permission slip from the UN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Tighelander
Uhhhhh .... ok, I'll bite. This was meant as kind of a joke. But with all funny parodies, they are based in the truth. I'll explain.

Missile attacks did nothing to erode al-Queda or it's established position within Afghanistan. If anything, they merely convinced OBL and his band of merry men that they risked no serious military retaliation from the US. Even after attacking US troops in Saudi Arabia. Even after attacking two US embassy's. Even after attacking a US naval warship. A few dozen missiles were launched. Obviously, no serious damage was done to the terrorist network. They were still free to operate unmolested from any one of their dozens of camps within Afghanistan.

I do not remember AlGore suggesting we go after Afghanistan or al-Queda after any of those attacks. I do not remember the "hawk" AlGore suggesting any military action to back up his well documented rhetoric about the WMD's within Iraq and the threat they impose. But, then again, I do not remember President/CIC AlGore making the decision to fire those missiles. Must have missed that.

Back in 1991, I do remember AlGore selling his Gulf War One vote to the side who gave him the most time to speak. Real "hawk" that guy, yessirree.

My point is, given his past performances, I believe he would have treated it as a crime scene, and launched an investigation. Get it.
19 posted on 03/30/2004 7:49:15 PM PST by Jeeper (Virginia is for Jeeper's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: shamusotoole
According to opensecrets.org, Clarke has given to the Democrats for the past 10 years.

And ONLY to the Democrats

...I wonder if Clarke's FBI File was amongst those stolen by Hillary....?

Just a thought...

20 posted on 03/31/2004 5:56:50 AM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson