Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
Michael should have been removed as Terri's guardian long ago.
He is in violation of several statutes and should have no legal standing because of it. You can look them up http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?Mode=View%20Statutes&Submenu=1&Tab=statutes

363 posted on 03/30/2004 5:14:02 PM PST by tutstar ( <{{--->< http://ripe4change.4-all.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies ]


To: tutstar
Ah, yes. You can post a link to the statutes, but you can't explain how they've been violated.

And that's the problem the Schindlers have; they haven't met the burden of proof.

364 posted on 03/30/2004 5:19:03 PM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

To: tutstar
Michael's behavior has been satistic towards Terri. Armed guards when parents come to visit. Incredible. Terri was prevented from getting therapy. Michael would not even allow flowers for her. And let's not forget, Michael had the feeding tube removed for both of his parents and, in his own words, felt good about it.

Michael has a mistress, two illigitmate children, and has treated Terri's parents horribly. Is that the kind of person who should decided if Terri should live?

Why not let the parents take care of her? Terri left no living will. Michael didn't even recall her "request" until eight years later.

369 posted on 03/30/2004 5:37:25 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson