Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ben-Veniste Leaks Excerpt of Condi's Classified Testimony
Newsmax ^ | 3/29/04

Posted on 03/29/2004 8:14:21 AM PST by areafiftyone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

1 posted on 03/29/2004 8:14:21 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Then, quoting her classified testimony, he said Rice insisted, "'I could not anticipate that they would try to use an airplane as a missile' [while] acknowledging that the intelligence community could anticipate it."

The quote from Condi Rice isn't classified. She said it at a press briefing.

2 posted on 03/29/2004 8:16:46 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
But area, this is a bi-partisan committee and there is no real effort to harm Dr. Rice, who would be a formidable challenger to Her Royal Clintonista.
3 posted on 03/29/2004 8:17:31 AM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
yet another reason to KICK ben vineste's sorry butt off the commission
4 posted on 03/29/2004 8:17:31 AM PST by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Ben-Veniste. The king of sleaze.
5 posted on 03/29/2004 8:17:34 AM PST by Fresh Wind (George Bush kills terrorists. Bill Clinton pardons them. John Al-Qerry will apologize to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Isn't there the possibility of prison time for the unauthorized release of classified material? I guess that law doesn't apply to Dems either.
6 posted on 03/29/2004 8:18:11 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Bill Clinton is the Neville Chamberlain of the War on Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Isn't distributing classified material for publication a violation of US laws? Shouldn't Ben-Veniste be punished for this??
7 posted on 03/29/2004 8:18:20 AM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
If this is traceable to Ben Viniste the Republicans should demand his removal. He is politicizing these hearings the same way he worked the impeachment hearings. Set a trap and spring it on him... please
8 posted on 03/29/2004 8:19:13 AM PST by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
The RATS are very busy. They are trying to blame ONE PERSON (GWB) for the attacks on the US.

This is like blaming a WOMAN for being beat up by her HUSBAND during an ALCOHOLIC RAGE.
9 posted on 03/29/2004 8:19:19 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (The LINE has been drawn. While the narrow minded see a line, the rest see a circle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
If he's leaking classified info., he should be brought up on charges. It doesn't matter that he's quoting her correctly or incorrectly, but that he knowingly is leaking anything.
10 posted on 03/29/2004 8:20:09 AM PST by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Condi Rice did not have the information about the possibility to use planes as missiles because the woman that claims to have seen the memorandum was not hired as a translator until after 9/11 and would not have been privy to anything that was translated earlier. The woman is another disgruntled, fired, employee.
11 posted on 03/29/2004 8:20:29 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
They had better be careful, because I have a feeling if this continues, there is going to be a massive information dump that will result in the Clintons being run out of town on a rail.
12 posted on 03/29/2004 8:22:35 AM PST by McGavin999 (Evil thrives when good men do nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Could you please point me to an article detailing this woman and the memo translation?
13 posted on 03/29/2004 8:22:41 AM PST by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
OBL and AQ are to blame... Bush is trying to drain the swamp that Clinton let fill up... No news here... time to move on to the Democrats next allegation...
14 posted on 03/29/2004 8:22:44 AM PST by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
When does Tom Kane get control back? Last week people are waving clarke's book around and this guy is silent.Tom please wakeup.
15 posted on 03/29/2004 8:24:31 AM PST by magua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
The RATS are very busy.

They're not called 'RATS for nothing.

16 posted on 03/29/2004 8:24:46 AM PST by Mike Bates (Artist Formerly Known as mikeb704.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Democrats on the Commission immediately seized on Ben-Veniste's leak to issue new demands that Rice testify in public.

I know I should be past astonishment at the hypocrisy of the liberals.... but this one is noteworthy even by their standards. If this is an illegal/unethical leak, then to use it to buttress their demands for public testimony is beneath even their standards. After all, weren't we lectured during Memogate that because those memos were "illegally" leaked, the content (you know, that insignificant little Ted Kennedy obstruction-of-justice thingy) is off limits? If the Democrats won't allow use of leaked information to investigate a crime... then isn't it a bit inconsistent for them to rely on it to demand public testimony?

17 posted on 03/29/2004 8:25:05 AM PST by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedEyeJack
Actually, this is a good thing.

Since Ben Veniste leaked a classified statement, there's ample reason to charge him with partisanship. But that's not the real benefit.

Rice can say that she cannot deal with a commission that is leaking classified material or she can say, "okay, since you guys are going to leak, I might as well come on down and give public testimony". See, it's all a question of building things up to the moment at which Condi walks in and lets the air out of the Democrats baloon.

This is Ollie North all over again, folks. Only Condi knows what she's doing.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

18 posted on 03/29/2004 8:27:13 AM PST by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "John Kerry: all John F., no Kennedy..." Click on my pic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Then, quoting her classified testimony, he said Rice insisted, "'I could not anticipate that they would try to use an airplane as a missile' [while] acknowledging that the intelligence community could anticipate it."

I thought the story on this was that she was referring to the intelligence spikes pre-9/11-- that those spikes had nothing to do with using planes to hit buildings.

19 posted on 03/29/2004 8:27:23 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
What an (censored statements)!
20 posted on 03/29/2004 8:27:58 AM PST by Maigrey (We don't need a thumbsucker in the White House. - azgopgal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson