Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mistrial Looks Likely as Tyco Jurors Return
aol news ^ | 3 29 04 | MICHAEL WEISSENSTEIN,

Posted on 03/29/2004 6:55:08 AM PST by freepatriot32

NEW YORK (March 29) - Jurors have described their deliberations in the trial of two former Tyco International executives as ''poisonous'' and ''irreparably compromised.'' The judge has called their notes to him ''disturbing'' and seems to be leaning toward a mistrial.

Nonetheless, Judge Michael J. Obus concurred with jurors' request to return to work Monday morning, even after they wrote Friday that they had ''ceased to be able to conduct respectful, open-minded, good-faith deliberations.''

Obus must decide whether to keep pushing jurors to overcome what they have described as an atmosphere of animosity that has dominated the jury room in recent days.

''The judge is going to do everything possible to refrain from declaring a mistrial,'' said Christopher J. Bebel, a former federal prosecutor who practices securities law in Houston. ''But there's only so far he can go ... in all likelihood it looks like his efforts will be futile.''

The jurors are deliberating 32 counts against Tyco's former chief executive L. Dennis Kozlowski, 57, and former chief financial officer Mark Swartz, 43. The defendants are accused of stealing $600 million from Tyco.

The defense argued that the two men earned every dime and that the board of directors and the company's auditors knew about the compensation and never objected.

According to notes from other jurors, one juror wants Swartz and Kozlowski acquitted on all counts and has refused to deliberate any other potential verdict.

One juror, a 79-year-old former teacher and lawyer, on Friday made what some observers described as an ''OK'' gesture with her thumb and forefinger as she passed the defense and prosecution tables.

Over the weekend, at least two news organizations, the New York Post and The Wall Street Journal, took the unusual step of identifying the juror by name as the purported holdout. The Post ran a Page One story Saturday with a drawing of her and the headline, ''Ms. Trial.'' Legal experts say that could be grounds for a mistrial because publicity could increase pressure on her.

The defendants are accused of stealing from the Bermuda-based conglomerate they once headed by hiding excessive pay packages from the company's board and by selling stock at inflated prices. Much of the trial has been dominated by descriptions of flamboyant behavior and breakneck spending emblematic of the era of corporate scandal that produced a string of recent high-profile white-collar trials.

AP-NY-03-29-04 0930EST


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: as; jurors; likely; looks; mistrial; return; tyco

1 posted on 03/29/2004 6:55:11 AM PST by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
The fix is in?
2 posted on 03/29/2004 6:57:49 AM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
AOL is also showing a photo of the back of the woman's head. Such pressure on a sitting juror on a trial in progress is shameful at best.

It's a blatant attempt to undermine the justice system, and there should be some serious penalties for it.
3 posted on 03/29/2004 6:58:09 AM PST by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
I think that this is the best justice that money can buy. Dennis should be proud of himself, IMHO.
4 posted on 03/29/2004 6:59:57 AM PST by Thebaddog (Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HarryCaul
I heard a few news reports on the Kozlowski case this morning, and it is painfully obvious that this woman shouldn't have been on the jury in the first place. This case is going to end in a mistrial, and Mr. Kozlowski is going to face another trial on these charges.
5 posted on 03/29/2004 7:02:29 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE north strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Just seems that this woman slipped under the radar during the jury selection and is an obvious plant.
6 posted on 03/29/2004 7:05:12 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
It's quite possible she shouldn't have been on the jury, and it's quite possible that she's done something criminal.

But..and this is a BIG but...the trial is still in progress.

The news media is directly attempting to influence this woman, a sitting juror on a trial in progress, and that's wrong, no matter how you slice it.
7 posted on 03/29/2004 7:06:04 AM PST by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HarryCaul
The news media did not force this woman to make some kind of a gesture to the defense table last week. She made herself the center of all this media attention.
8 posted on 03/29/2004 7:10:33 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE north strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
They could cover the story without using her image or name, don't you think?

You know, like every other trial in history.
9 posted on 03/29/2004 7:12:42 AM PST by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
They are using "white-collar crime" to prosecute capitalism in my opinion, and I was pleased to read this story, quite frankly.
10 posted on 03/29/2004 7:24:02 AM PST by jojodamofo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HarryCaul
It's quite possible she shouldn't have been on the jury, and it's quite possible that she's done something criminal. But..and this is a BIG but...the trial is still in progress.

Don't you know it's dangerous to use "woman" and "a BIG but" in the same paragraph?

11 posted on 03/29/2004 7:30:44 AM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
These Tyco executives defrauded shareholders and should face civil penalities. However, They did not defraud me and I don't appreciate being one of 'the people' V Kozlowski.


Although this instance seems suspect, our 1,000 year old common law right of jury nullification is a positive aspect to the US legal system.


http://www.fija.org

12 posted on 03/29/2004 7:37:32 AM PST by society-by-contract
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota; All
Just seems that this woman slipped under the radar during the jury selection and is an obvious plant.

A plant? I don't think so. Do you think that maybe the prosecution hasn't proved it's case, and the media coverage (being liberal) hasn't disclosed this in its coverage?

We've heard about all the lavish spending, and it was (agreed) over-the-top, and the media wants a guilty verdict ON THAT BASIS, but the question here was --was it CRIMINAL?

It's only criminal if it was unapproved and fraudulently/intentionally hidden from the board.

I'm not sure that the prosecution has proved this.

And the hold-out is apparently a retired lawyer who just may be zeroing in on the proper legal question.

Also, this quote from the NY Post:

The divisions on the jury prompted defense attorneys to make three separate motions for a mistrial over two days. Judge Obus declined to grant any of them. One of the notes indicated the majority of the jury favored a conviction. "One or more jurors ... refuse to recognize the right of at least one juror to have a good-faith belief that the prosecution had not proved its case," the note said. Word of the animosity had seemed sudden. Earlier Thursday, the jurors had indicated that they were making progress in the complicated case.

So the jurors "out of control" seem to be the ones favoring conviction, and one juror who disagrees is holding her gound, civilly. That's my take.

13 posted on 03/29/2004 7:38:41 AM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
And let me add: I was (am) a Tyco shareholder, and my stock took a bath -- but even so, I don't want a conviction in this case unless the conviction is properly proved.
14 posted on 03/29/2004 7:41:34 AM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
So throw her off the jury, and appoint one of the alternates, who has already heard the entire case, to continue delibrations.

What a waste of taxpayers money to spend 5 months on a trial and throw it out because one scumbag gave the defense the high sign.
15 posted on 03/29/2004 9:03:44 AM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson