Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslims: We Are The New Victims Of Stop And Search (UK)
The Guardian (UK) ^ | Rosie Cowan/Alan Travis

Posted on 03/28/2004 6:29:40 PM PST by blam

Muslims: we are the new victims of stop and search

Police accused of misusing anti-terror powers

Rosie Cowan and Alan Travis
Monday March 29, 2004
The Guardian (UK)

British Muslims claim they are being victimised by police who, they say, are using their powers of stop and search to harass them in the climate of fear over terrorist attacks. Lawyers and groups representing the Islamic community say they are receiving a growing number of complaints from people who have never been in trouble with the police but who report being stopped in the street or in their cars, or having their homes searched.

Some have been pulled over for questioning at airports or ferry terminals, and all allege they have been picked on for no apparent reason other than that they are Muslim.

Massoud Shadjareh, chairman of the Islamic Human Rights Commission, said police activity directed against Muslims had risen sharply since September 11 2001. The group recently printed 500,000 leaflets informing Muslims of their legal rights.

Mr Shadjareh pointed to Home Office figures which showed that in 2002-03 there were 32,100 searches overall under the Terrorism Act, 21,900 up on the previous year and 30,000 more than in 1999-2000. He claimed Muslims were the subject of a hugely disproportionate number of these.

"I recently gave a workshop in Luton and of 12 people in the group, seven had been stopped and searched by police. Often, they are people who have lived in the UK for decades and have never broken the law in any way," Mr Shadjareh said.

Khalid Sofi, secretary of the legal affairs committee of the Muslim Council of Britain, said anti-terrorist legislation had given rise to Islamophobia. "The whole Muslim community is seen as suspect, and there is worrying evidence it is being abused by police to harass ordinary citizens."

Ruhul Tarafder, campaigns coordinator for the 1990 Trust, a black-led human rights organisation, carried out research last November and December in Tower Hamlets, east London, and in Westminster, where he discovered many Muslims who had had bad experiences with the police.

"Muslims from 14 years old and upwards had come to view being stopped by the police as part of normal life," he said. "No real reasons were given, though anti-terrorist legislation was frequently cited.

"Often it was when they were wearing traditional clothes or if they had Muslim-style beards. Muslims understand there is a security threat but it doesn't mean they should be treated unfairly."

Leroy Logan of the Black Police Officers Association said: "What we are hearing gives us a worrying sense that section 44 [of the anti-terrorist legislation] is being used by police disproportionately."

The resentment expressed by Muslim groups stands in sharp contrast to the views of the general population on how the so-called war on terrorism is being conducted in Britain. Most voters feel the government is handling the crisis well, according to the results of a Guardian/ICM poll.

The survey was carried out in the aftermath of the Madrid train bombings and the warning by the Metropolitan police commissioner, Sir John Stevens, that a terrorist attack on London was inevitable.

It shows that 50% of the public believe that the government is handling the crisis "fairly well," and a further 8% think it is coping "very well".

This contrasts with 39% of voters who think the government is doing either "fairly badly" or "very badly" when it comes to handling terrorism.

The findings come after David Blunkett rebuked Sir John for making people "jumpy" by suggesting that a terrorist attack was inevitable. In an interview with the Sunday Telegraph the home secretary said: "There has to be a balance between telling the truth and reassurance. Otherwise people are jumpy without it having a good effect."

Figures for the number of times police use their stop and search powers on Muslims are sketchy and do not include other counterterrorist activity, such as house searches. Scotland Yard statistics give a breakdown by ethnic group, and show a slight increase in the number of Asians, who are mainly Muslim, being stopped by the Metropolitan police. From April 2000-01 it was 9.9%; 2001-02 11.8%; 2002-03 12.2%; and 2003-04 11.7% so far.

Mr Shadjareh said police concentration on Muslims was racist and counterproductive, as it alienated the very community police needed to help defeat terrorism.

"People carrying out bombing attacks are not going round with long beards, looking like imams, praying in mosques all day," he said. "They will be clean-shaven, have girlfriends, drink in pubs. They will not stand out as Muslims or they will be disguised."

David Veness, the Metropolitan police assistant commissioner in charge of specialist operations, which includes anti-terrorism, admitted there was a dramatic increase in counterterrorist activity. But he insisted no community was being unfairly targeted.

"It is clear that this unprecedented level of activity causes concern in some communities," he said. "Other communities may believe they are being unfairly identified with terrorists. We understand these concerns but would categorically say that no one is being targeted by police because of their culture or faith.

"For us to do so would be the most counterproductive course of action we could take because it is not police actions alone that will ultimately defeat terrorism but the combined actions of all communities."

A Met spokeswoman said police were aware of the negative impact some people felt police actions were having in the current state of high alert, but said senior officers met regularly with Muslim representatives and encouraged feedback.

· ICM interviewed a random sample of 1,005 British adults by telephone from March 19 to 21. Interviews were conducted across the country and the results weighted to the profile of all adults.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: muslims; new; search; stop; ukmuslims; victime

1 posted on 03/28/2004 6:29:41 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
If they think they're in trouble now, just wait until a major terrorism attack (God forbid) goes off in Britain.
2 posted on 03/28/2004 6:32:41 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Some have been pulled over for questioning at airports or ferry terminals, and all allege they have been picked on for no apparent reason other than that they are Muslim.

Cool. The cops have Allah-DAR. I wonder what the range is and if it is more reliable than GAY-DAR?

3 posted on 03/28/2004 6:38:28 PM PST by evolved_rage (Where they take an arm and a leg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
my heart just bleeds for them
A big So What
4 posted on 03/28/2004 6:38:34 PM PST by Charlespg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Muslims get upset and pack up and go back to the middle east where life is so much better
thanks to their superior religious governments...
NOT
5 posted on 03/28/2004 6:45:39 PM PST by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
WAH. If it were the Lutherans trying to blow up the rest of humanity, I'd have no sympathy for them, either.
6 posted on 03/28/2004 6:49:38 PM PST by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
They can always go to some jihadistan paradise!
7 posted on 03/28/2004 7:24:42 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Lawyers representing the Islamic community? Now that must be one scary bunch.
8 posted on 03/28/2004 7:36:54 PM PST by quantim (Victory must be absolute, it cannot be relative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: blam
as they say..."You Reap What You Sow" and "A Few Bad Apples" have spoiled the islamic barrel!
10 posted on 03/28/2004 8:31:36 PM PST by KingNo155
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Sure am glad not to be a member of a religion which has so many jack asses murdering innocent people in the name of their God!

I would change my religion, speak out, or disavow it.

Would keep my faith in my God anyway. What a dilemma!

11 posted on 03/28/2004 8:58:37 PM PST by FixitGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Muslims are the victims?

MUSLIMS ARE NOT THE VICTIMS.
12 posted on 03/28/2004 9:59:43 PM PST by rogueleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
If only we were having to listen to this whining here.
13 posted on 03/28/2004 10:05:47 PM PST by SendShaqtoIraq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Mr Shadjareh said police concentration on Muslims was racist and counterproductive, as it alienated the very community police needed to help defeat terrorism.

"People carrying out bombing attacks are not going round with long beards, looking like imams, praying in mosques all day," he said. "They will be clean-shaven, have girlfriends, drink in pubs. They will not stand out as Muslims or they will be disguised."

This bloke is kidding isn't he? Hasn't he ever heard of the Finnsbury Park mosque where al Qaeda recruited Richard Reid, also Zacharias Moussaoui had links to that mosque and its jihad preaching cleric Abu Hamza. Reid and Hamza both had/have beards.

As for having girlfriends and drinking in pubs, that's just nuts. Muslims are not supposed to drink alcohol at all and the kind of fundementalist Wahabii who would engage in jihad isn't goint to break that most basic of islamic rules. Also, what western woman in her right mind would get involved with some psychopathic religous bloke who is just passing through (while planning a terrorist attack) and has about as much sex appeal as a road accident?

14 posted on 03/29/2004 5:13:34 AM PST by David Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: David Hunter
As for having girlfriends and drinking in pubs, that's just nuts. Muslims are not supposed to drink alcohol at all and the kind of fundementalist Wahabii who would engage in jihad isn't goint to break that most basic of islamic rules.

(if memory serves) A number of the hi-jackers involved in 9-11 spent time in strip bar in the days running up to 9-11.
15 posted on 03/29/2004 7:25:28 AM PST by Valin (Hating people is like burning down your house to kill a rat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Valin
"(if memory serves) A number of the hi-jackers involved in 9-11 spent time in strip bar in the days running up to 9-11."

...also in Vegas too.

16 posted on 03/29/2004 11:35:15 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blam
Victems hell! They are being searched for their own good. Muslims are often victemized by sources unknown, whom secrete explosives in the Muslims clothes without their knowledge or consent and later set them off by remote control. It is causing members of this religion of peace to look like insanely murderous radicals, with no conscience.

They owe the Brits a debt of gratitude, for being conserned about their safety and reputation.
17 posted on 03/29/2004 11:44:11 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Rat Speak for once means what it say's: "we'll do 'ANYTHING' to beat GW Bush.!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Massoud Shadjareh, have your muslim brothers stop blowing up innocent men, women and children and you wouldn't have a problem!
18 posted on 03/29/2004 11:47:47 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
profiling works
19 posted on 03/29/2004 11:49:06 AM PST by petercooper (Obviously, common sense is not prerequisite to voting rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson