Monsoor Ijaz to testify before 9/11 commission

Fox News Channel ^ | 3/28/04 | me

[alnick]

Please forgive the vanity, but I've done a search and cannot find any reference to this.

I saw Monsoor Ijaz on FNC an hour or so ago, and he said that he has been asked to testify before the 9/11 commission. He appeared to be anxious to do so.

If this has been posted elsewhere, I'll ask the mod to take this down.

[nopardons]

The commission is a KANGAROO COURT and absolutely worthless and biased.

[shield]

I saw this on FNC too. I'm so glad he's been ask to give testimony to the commission. I'm sure pressure was put on the commission to extend the invite.

[areafiftyone]

I am practically jumping up and down in my chair here!

[Salvey]

He'd better watch his back, else Arkancide might occur.

[Peach]

Woa!!

Ping aling.

[smonk]

ask the mods to take it down?

ugh. reminds me of the eunuchs over at the DU.
[nothing personal, by any means. I've been looking
for an opportunity to bring this up]

never seen a bigger buncha spineless little weasels
in my life. they're utterly over-moderated, submit
to inconsistent and capricious rules regarding posts,
and ironically use their completely controlled forum
to call bush a fascist.

apparently "bush is a fascist" is one of the few topics
that have been approved by big brother. they're getting
banned in droves, and flocking over to people for change,
where the number on topic seems to be what a snithole DU
has become.

[BobFromNJ]

Bump!!! I am jumping too!!

[cyncooper]

The commission could NOT credibly proceed if they blatantly ignored certain testimony in favor of what was most likely false testimony offered to them by Clarke.

Most excellent news that they are willing at this point to consider a wider range of evidence.

[InterceptPoint]

Let me be the first or perhaps the second to predict that he will not testify. Too many predictions gone South for old Monsoor. Not credible anymore as far as I can see. He always has good news. He is on the right side of things but his stuff just never pans out. Too bad.

[mystery-ak]

I bet they won't televise his testimony!

[cyncooper]

I think the 9-11 Commission hearings are a bipartisan thing.

In a way they are or could be but they have clearly been hijacked with an anti-Bush angle and they need to get on track of the purpose.

I will point out that allowing those families with an agenda to sit there and applaud certain testimony is most inappropriate. So was the waving around of Clarke's book as if it was Holy Writ. Then we had Bob Kerrey offer the liar Clarke a job!

Please, you cannot deceive us here.

[alnick]

I was surprised that it wasn't already posted, and did't want to post a duplicate.

Agreed about DU. Disagree with them in the slightest and you're outta there. :-)

[not-alone]

best news in days, can we hope it will be in public?

[MizSterious]

Not to mention--they gave Clarke much more time than anyone else. I'd like to see Clarke's critics get the same amount of time as he got.

[areafiftyone]

LOL - AWWWW come-on tell us how you really feel about DU. ;-)

[Peach]

I hadn't even thought that far ahead. Let's hope he testifies in public.

He's not a national security person so I can't see why he shouldn't.

[Azzurri]

best news in days, can we hope it will be in public?

We can hope, but I doubt it makes barely a mention on CNN, MSNBC, etc, since he is under contract to Fox...plus he will be saying things which counter their agendas.

[Dog]

Did Moby send you here TROLL!

[rodguy911]

That's a sad commentary, is there any way they,the lefties on the commission, can sabotage Monsoor, cause belive me he could hurt the rats.

[alnick]

Let me be the first or perhaps the second to predict that he will not testify.

Time will tell, but Greg Jarrett asked him, "Are you going to testify," to which Ijaz responded, "I hope so." He still had that pi$$ed off tone to his voice that I heard when Monsoor first responded to Clarke's lies.