Posted on 03/28/2004 6:10:42 AM PST by truthandlife
Clarke is an egomaniacal liar. The Dems backed a loser again.
Ahmed Shah Masood was aware of 9/11 attacks plan: CNN
Date: 2003-11-07 Posted By: Dan Sale
Topics: Ahmad Shah Masood : World Trade Center Attack : Afghanistan
Slain Afghan leader Ahmed Shah Masood had some reports of 9/11 attacks and he wanted to inform the west about it, a US TV channel, CNN reported. According to the Pentagons Defence Intelligence Agency, assassinated Afghan opposition leader Ahmed Shah Masood had "limited knowledge" of a planned attack against the United States and was warning the West of the threat.
Region: Americas Read It At: PakTribune (Mirrored Copy)
http://www.intellnet.org/news/2003/11/07/21477-1.html?PHPSESSID=5e8ac4cb58ca2c826edb0129ebeebc88
Ahmed Shah Masood was aware of 9/11 attacks plan: CNN
Friday November 07, 2003 (1515 PST)
ATLANTA, November 08 (Online): Slain Afghan leader Ahmed Shah Masood had some reports of 9/11 attacks and he wanted to inform the west about it, a US TV channel, CNN reported. According to the Pentagons Defence Intelligence Agency, assassinated Afghan opposition leader Ahmed Shah Masood had "limited knowledge" of a planned attack against the United States and was warning the West of the threat.
Northern Alliance leader Ahmed Shah Massoud was slain on September 9, 2001 by hiding a bomb in video camera. Two Tunisian al-Qaeda members impersonated as journalists killed Masood in a suicide attack. A Pentagon report got from the US national security archives said that Ahmed Shah Masood had got some information about the 9/11 attack through secret reports and he wanted to inform the US about it.
The cable, written in November 2001, was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by the National Security Archive at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. It was based on an interview with a classified source and reads:
"Through Northern Alliance intelligence efforts, the late commander Massoud gained limited knowledge regarding the intentions of the Saudi millionaire, Osama bin Laden and his terrorist Organisation, al-Qaeda, to perform a terrorist act against the U S, on a scale larger than the 1998 bombing of the U S embassies in Kenya and Tanzania."
The heavily edited DIA document does not specify what it meant by "limited knowledge," and the portion that follows the reference is blacked out. It continues by referring to a speech Massoud gave to the European Parliament in April 2001 in which the cable says he "warned the US government" about bin Laden. Massoud was on a diplomatic trip to Europe seeking financial support for his cause from the EU and individual countries.
The DIA report points out that Massoud was not a military threat to al Qaeda, even though his forces were fighting the Taliban for control of Afghanistan.
"Our investigators did look into the matter during their recent travels [to Afghanistan] and spoke to persons who might have some knowledge about the subject," said a spokesman for the independent commission set up by Congress to investigate the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
The cable says the two fake journalists, who were killed in the bomb blast, were al Qaeda operatives.
According to an article in Voice of Jihad, an online magazine the Middle East Media Research Institute says is associated with al Qaeda, the terrorist group claimed responsibility for Massouds assassination.
The story appeared last week in a translated version of the magazine on the Web site of the Washington-based nonprofit independent institute, which provides translations of Arabic, Farsi and Hebrew media reports and analyses of trends in the region.
The article quoted an interview with a bin Laden bodyguard after word reached bin Ladens camp of Massouds death:
"I remember asking him, What happened? And he replied by saying that Sheikh Osama [bin Laden] asked the brothers: Who will take it upon himself to deal with Ahmad [Shah] Massoud for me, because he harmed Allah and his sons? A few brothers volunteered to assassinate Massoud and be rewarded by Allah, and you heard the good news."
Several Tunisian men were convicted in Belgium in September of supplying false documents that Massouds assassins used to help them travel to Afghanistan.
1776?
1812?
1944?
2001?
The heavily edited DIA document does not specify what it meant by "limited knowledge," and the portion that follows the reference is blacked out. It continues by referring to a speech Massoud gave to the European Parliament in April 2001 in which the cable says he "warned the US government" about bin Laden. Massoud was on a diplomatic trip to Europe seeking financial support for his cause from the EU and individual countries.
Did this document ever cross Clarke's desk?
Report Details Saddam's Support for Terrorists Who Killed Americans
The above link is the FreeRepublic discussion thread.
The actual article is :
"Saddam Husseins Philanthropy of Terror"
It is a pdf document with substantial footnotes and put together by Dewey Murdock of the Hudson Institute.
Anyone have more info on this picture of a mural of the 9/11 tragedy that was taken in Iraq?
Bingo!
And this exposes the true scandal at the heart of Richard Clarke's revelations: Richard Clarke's own mind-set. He was ready to dismiss even the POSSIBILITY of Iraqi involvement, a single day after the attacks. He stood there on 9/12/2001 and told the President that because "Al Qaeda did this", looking for Iraqi fingerprints was unwarranted.
This arrogant, closed-minded man was a menace and I'm just glad he's out of public service.
But, they were a RELIGIOUS organization, and Saddam was SECULAR. I've always been told that Saddam therefore HATED Al Qaeda! /sarcasm
Saddam's behavior after 9/11, though, doesn't suggest anything to me. If he'd known, he would have either bragged or tried to hide that he knew.
Appears to have been the latter, doesn't it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.