Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: Bush has nothing to fear from this hilarious work of fiction
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 03/28/04 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 03/27/2004 3:29:41 PM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 next last
To: M. Dodge Thomas
Frist was absolutely correct to slap Clarke down for presuming to apologize for 911! He is not now nor was he ever in a position to make a public apology for the government. That is clearly a leadership function and in democracies we elect our leaders. Clarke was a mid-level technocrat whose sappy presumption of responsibility for 911 was a craven ploy designed to smear the administration. If you fell for it, you need to worry about your own "tone deafness."
101 posted on 03/27/2004 11:41:00 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ontos-on
I think the issue is the grandiosity of Clarke. . . . He is simply not in a position to offer the apology he did.

I think your comment is spot on! It reminds me of that comment (by Winston Churchill maybe?) that "He isn't important enough to be that humble!"

102 posted on 03/28/2004 12:27:48 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
BINGO!

And .. remember - Clarke had the direct ear of WJC, and when Bush came into office all that changed. I believe Clarke was expecting to get Condi's job - instead he was required to report to her. There are emails asking him why he didn't attend her meetings. Evidently, it was beneath him. I think we should add arrogance to his list of smarmy characteristics.

DOUBLE BINGO! This is all anyone needs to say to those who are 'supporting' the actions of Dick Clarke!

Somehow I doubt this myth that he is a Republican.

103 posted on 03/28/2004 4:22:32 AM PST by maica (World Peace starts with W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ontos-on
"I think the issue is the grandiosity of Clarke..."

I think that's an excellent term for this aspect of his personality - though for course a degree of "grandiosity" is a common characteristic of successful politicians and political commentators.




"He is simply not in a position to offer the apology he did."

My point about First and Clarke is that whatever one thinks of validity of Clarke's prespective or the appropriateness of his apology, it clearly touched a nerve for many listeners - and that whoever manages to latch onto this sentiment is mining valuable political ground.
104 posted on 03/28/2004 5:34:08 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros on the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: beckett
"Clarke was a mid-level technocrat whose sappy presumption of responsibility for 911 was a craven ploy designed to smear the administration. If you fell for it, you need to worry about your own "tone deafness."

IMO it's a mistake to confuse one's certainty about the inappropriateness of the apology with the fact that it resonated for many listeners.

For the reasons I listed (and many others) it's near suicide in American political culture to admit error - and I view this as an unfortunate and occasionally dangerous aspect of our system.

I don’t pretend to know how Rove (or anyone else) ought to finesse this problem.

But when I look at the poll numbers (for example, that Newsweek poll) and they show a substantial decline in the public's confidence in what has previously been their most favorable impress of this Administration, it's certainly looks to me like a problem.


105 posted on 03/28/2004 5:52:24 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros on the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
In October 2000, Clarke and Special Forces Colonel Mike Sheehan leave the White House after a meeting to discuss al-Qa'eda's attack on the USS Cole: "'What's it gonna take, Dick?' Sheehan demanded. 'Who the s*** do they think attacked the Cole, f****** Martians? The Pentagon brass won't let Delta go get bin Laden. Does al-Qa'eda have to attack the Pentagon to get their attention?'"

SPANK!

106 posted on 03/28/2004 6:42:16 AM PST by SquirrelKing (If your beer tastes heavy, your tongue needs excercise. - Newcastle Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; Alamo-Girl; onyx; ALOHA RONNIE; SpookBrat; Republican Wildcat; Howlin; dixiechick2000; ...
Steyn knocks another one outta the park ! I loved the comment referencing the Airplane! line, too.

Excerpt:

Having served both the 42nd and 43rd Presidents, Clarke was supposed to be the most authoritative proponent to advance the Democrats' agreed timeline of the last decade - to whit, from January 1993 to January 2001, Bill Clinton focused like a laser on crafting a brilliant plan to destroy al-Qa'eda, but, alas, just as he had dotted every "i", crossed every "t" and sent the intern to the photocopier, his eight years was up, so Bill gave it to the new guy as he was showing him the Oval Office - "That carpet under the desk could use replacing. Oh, and here's my brilliant plan to destroy al-Qa'eda, which you guys really need to implement right away."

The details of the brilliant plan need not concern us, which is just as well, as there aren't any. But the broader point, as The New York Times noted, is that "there was at least no question about the Clinton administration's commitment to combat terrorism".

Yessir, for eight years the Clinton administration was relentless in its commitment: no sooner did al-Qa'eda bomb the World Trade Center first time round, or blow up an American embassy, or a barracks, or a warship, or turn an entire nation into a terrorist training camp, than the Clinton team would redouble their determination to sit down and talk through the options for a couple more years. Then Bush took over and suddenly the superbly successful fight against terror all went to hell.


Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.


107 posted on 03/28/2004 6:53:43 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (The Democrats say they believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Oh ! You beat me here. Yeah, we know what the 'A' stands for alrighty ...



108 posted on 03/28/2004 6:58:48 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (The Democrats say they believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
Clarke will be just a memory in 2 months:)
109 posted on 03/28/2004 7:26:08 AM PST by international american (Support our troops!! Send Kerry back to Boston!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: livius
Another, very witty Freeper (whose name I don't recall) said that her facial expression was actually expressing, "Hey, did I demote this guy FAR enough?"

That was in Ann Coulter's piece titled "Chair-warmer on the hot seat" (last paragraph). Hilarious line.

110 posted on 03/28/2004 8:07:31 AM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thanks Pokey!
111 posted on 03/28/2004 8:08:01 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: international american
Yeah ! ;^)

112 posted on 03/28/2004 8:34:12 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (The Democrats say they believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
Watched Clarke on "Meet the Depressed" Just ended. Clarke is in love with himself,Russert was very easy on him.
113 posted on 03/28/2004 8:37:30 AM PST by international american (Support our troops!! Send Kerry back to Boston!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
"Instead, all the Islamists who went to Afghanistan in the 1990s graduated from Camp Osama and were dispersed throughout Europe, Asia, Australia and North America, where they lurk to this day. That's the Clarke-Clinton legacy."

Slimey, gutless X42, pay attention. Your attempt to rehab your "legacy" is not working. Thanks for the ping, Meekie.
114 posted on 03/28/2004 8:59:19 AM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Nowadays, talk radio and the internet have muted the mainstream to the extent that even the Newsweek poll says over half of Clarke's audience doesn't believe a word he's saying.

LOL, indeed, talk radio and the internet are powerful tools of communication. I just hope that sooner rather than later, we'll be able to undo the damage the liberals with the help of the media keep causing.

115 posted on 03/28/2004 10:03:24 AM PST by Victoria Delsoul (Kerry's 3 Purple Hearts are: 2 for minor arm and thigh injury and 1 for killing a semi-dead VietCong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
Bump!
116 posted on 03/28/2004 11:01:47 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
That's the Clarke-Clinton legacy. And, if it were mine, I wouldn't be going around boasting about it.

Yup, you nailed him.

117 posted on 03/28/2004 3:08:44 PM PST by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in small groups or in whole armies, we don't care how we do, but we're gonna getcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
>Mr Clarke would seem to be channelling Leslie Nielsen's >deadpan doctor in Airplane!: "Stewardess, we need to get >this passenger to a hospital."
>"A hospital? What is it?"
>"It's a big building with patients, but that's not >important right now."

This guy is freaking brilliant!!! LMAO!
118 posted on 03/28/2004 4:16:30 PM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc On The Bay
Do we Begin to see a resemblance between "The Left" & "An Orthodox Religion??"

I resent that slander to Orthodox Jews and Orthodox Christians. I suggest you rephrase that as "Kool-aid gargling cult".

119 posted on 03/28/2004 8:32:52 PM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Brilliant article! This gives me hope after enduring several days of the libs high-fiving it over Clarke's "success".
120 posted on 03/28/2004 9:03:44 PM PST by nutmeg (Why vote for Bush? Imagine Commander in Chief John F’in al-Qerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson