Of course, the media won't mention this: it might be good news.
To: arnoldfwilliams
The President can get this info out in campaign speeches, the debates. Kerry and the Demonrats will continue to suppress this kind of info because according to them the sky is falling under President Bush.
To: arnoldfwilliams
Can't they just redefine poverty to make Bush look bad? How hard is that?
3 posted on
03/27/2004 11:03:04 AM PST by
samtheman
To: arnoldfwilliams
According to our Democrat counterparts, this is still the Depression. We are supposed to think soup kitchens and people with dirty feet. Fact is, many people own homes and have computers and everything like that. No, the press will not report this.
4 posted on
03/27/2004 11:08:09 AM PST by
Patriot11
(Visit my site! www.patriotjournal.com)
To: arnoldfwilliams
According to your chart, Nixon, Carter, Bush(41), and Bush(43) were all bad for the poverty rate. One could probably guess from the chart that the stock market doing well lowers the poverty rate.
6 posted on
03/27/2004 11:15:12 AM PST by
Moonman62
To: arnoldfwilliams
WELFARE REFORM
10 posted on
03/27/2004 11:21:35 AM PST by
raloxk
To: arnoldfwilliams
add to the fact that fewer women with children, who had beeen on welfare, did not return to welfare and you have a strange set of other econimic news.
14 posted on
03/27/2004 12:39:25 PM PST by
q_an_a
^
15 posted on
03/27/2004 1:06:44 PM PST by
jla
To: arnoldfwilliams
thanks for this post...I will use these stats the next time I hear a Democrat play the class-envy game.
To: arnoldfwilliams
Term: Bush 43 AVG % ALL 11.9 AVG % FMILIES 10.2
I'm confused. 11.9 is about 1 in 8.5, but my radio keeps telling that 1 in 5 American children go to bed hungry. Yet, the 11.9% includes adults, noit just children.
Surely a CHARITY wouldn't lie or distort, just to get extra donations, would it? /sarc>
17 posted on
03/27/2004 10:43:33 PM PST by
ApplegateRanch
(The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson