To: arnoldfwilliams
Can't they just redefine poverty to make Bush look bad? How hard is that?
3 posted on
03/27/2004 11:03:04 AM PST by
samtheman
To: samtheman
It is easy for them. Look at the graph. If you think like a Dem, you will pick the lowest point on the graph, the early 1970s, and ignore everything beforehand. Then, you scream that poverty is higher than the seventies with the tacit implication that the seventies were bad and that we are doing worse now.
7 posted on
03/27/2004 11:16:20 AM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Communism failed because people like to own stuff)
To: samtheman
Can't they just redefine poverty to make Bush look bad? How hard is that?
Not very easily, too many competing interests are rooted in how it is calculated. The methodology is pretty much set in rock by court cases fighting over the impacts to government programs, benefits, and economic reports from attempted changes to it.
The federal version of the povertyline/threshold is calculated by the census bureau and published in the Federal Register each year.
Read this for more than you would ever want to know about the poverty measure and its history.
http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/povmeas/papers/orshansky.html
From there they determine howmany folk lay below that threshold for the proverty census.
13 posted on
03/27/2004 12:29:57 PM PST by
ancient_geezer
(Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson