Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Vetoes UN Resolution Condemning Hamas Founder's Killing
Voice of America ^ | Mar 26, 2004 | Jenny Falcon

Posted on 03/25/2004 8:22:11 PM PST by TaxRelief

The United States has used its veto power to block a Security Council resolution presented by Arab states Thursday condemning Israel's killing Monday of Hamas founder Sheikh Ahmed Yassin in the Gaza Strip.

U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte told the Security Council that the United States is "deeply troubled" by the killing of Ahmed Yassin, saying it has escalated tensions in the region and could set back peace building efforts.

But before the vote, Mr. Negroponte told the council that the United States could not approve the measure, which it views as one-sided for failing to mention Hamas suicide attacks that have killed hundreds of Israelis.

"This resolution condemns the killing of Sheikh Yassin, the leader of Hamas, a terrorist organization dedicated to the destruction of Israel," he said. "Last week, Hamas proudly proclaimed its responsibility for a suicide bombing in the Israeli port of Ashdod that killed ten Israelis and injured ten more. This resolution does not condemn that attack, nor does it condemn those responsible."

The United States is the only nation on the Security Council that has not condemned the extra-judicial killing of Sheikh Yassin. But several European council members, including Britain, Germany and Romania, abstained from the vote because they, too, described the text as unbalanced. France, Russia and Spain joined other council members that voted for the resolution.

The diplomats could not agree on last minute modifications to the text, which included a condemnation of terrorist "atrocities" against Israelis. But Abdallah Baali, the U.N. ambassador from Algeria, which submitted the resolution on behalf of Arab states, said the text was balanced because it condemned "all terrorist attacks against any civilians."

Mr. Baali criticized the council's failure to reach a consensus. "By not condemning the extra-judicial killing of Sheikh Yassin, the Security Council is not sending the right message to the world that has unanimously condemned this crime," he said. "It is not sending the right message to those who sincerely believe that the Security Council is the custodian of international law, but it is certainly sending the wrong message to Israel."

After the vote, Israel's U.N. Ambassador and the Palestinian U.N. representative traded insults in the council chamber.

The Palestinian representative Nasser al-Kidwa lashed out at the United States for repeatedly blocking resolutions against Israel. He called on the United States to take a more neutral role in the Middle East crisis and blamed the Security Council for failing to take action against the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories.

Israeli Ambassador Dan Gillerman said, if it had passed, the resolution would have "made a mockery" of the Security Council. He defended Israel's action against terrorists, described the Hamas leader as a godfather of terrorism and said there is no difference between Hamas and al-Qaida.

The Security Council session came one day after the U.N. Human Rights Commission adopted a resolution condemning the assassination of Sheikh Yassin.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ahmedyassin; alqaeda; alqaida; assassination; hamas; israel; johnnegroponte; negroponte; sheikhahmedyassin; un; unresolution; veto
After the vote, Israel's U.N. Ambassador and the Palestinian U.N. representative traded insults in the council chamber.

Wish I could have been a fly on the wall...

1 posted on 03/25/2004 8:22:11 PM PST by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
I had a robo-fly on the wall. Here is a transcript.

Palie-"What are you doing??"

US- "Vetoing the thing"

Palie-"But Why?? Why must Israel exist?"

US-"Why don't you go blow yourself up near the French guy?"

2 posted on 03/25/2004 8:24:34 PM PST by GeronL (I am here for the duration! /kidding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
I imagine they are practiced at it by now!
3 posted on 03/25/2004 8:26:45 PM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
This is a VERY scary development.
It's not rocket science to commend the isrealies for removing this cancer from their region. This guy has alot of blood on his hands.
We have deconstructionists and moral equivationists who refuse to condemn terrorism.
We have the French betrayal of US Interests in favor of china.
We have pakistan on the verge of toppling into an islamic mullacracy
The international atmosphere is exactly backwards... completely counterintuitive.

We have a noxious international atmosphere and we are not recognizing it. We are doing nothing about it. We are trying to appease it. It's frightening and heralds the required atmosphere for tribulation style tyranny.

The storm clouds are gathering darkly.
4 posted on 03/25/2004 8:36:03 PM PST by Samurai_Jack (Pacifism by its nature invites escalating acts of war on anyone who practices it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
The U.N. takes the side of the terrorists. Now there's a big surprise. The next thing we'll hear is that the oil-for-food program was the biggest scam ever, with the U.N. directly aiding Saddam&Sons' rape/murder/terrorism enterprise and accepting billion$ in bribe$. Oops, that already happened.
5 posted on 03/25/2004 8:37:32 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (All the good taglines are taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack; MEG33
This is a VERY scary development.

Not scary enough to qualify for the sidebar apparently.

6 posted on 03/25/2004 8:40:27 PM PST by TaxRelief (God bless America and God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Why is there a Palestenian UN rep? Are they are internationally recognized nation?

Forgive my ignorance.
7 posted on 03/25/2004 8:40:51 PM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandbar
He is a non-Voting (attending) representative. In the same way that Washington, DC has non-voting representatives in the house.
8 posted on 03/25/2004 8:46:25 PM PST by TaxRelief (God bless America and God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
He called on the United States to take a more neutral role in the Middle East crisis and blamed the Security Council for failing to take action against the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories.

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Burke

Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. - Goldwater

9 posted on 03/25/2004 8:47:42 PM PST by Huber (A conservative is someone who accepts reality! (paraphrased from R. Kirk))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandbar
They are not an internationally recognized nation, but they are considered a nation-in-the-making, if you will.
10 posted on 03/25/2004 8:47:46 PM PST by TaxRelief (God bless America and God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Huber
But what does Huber say?
11 posted on 03/25/2004 8:48:46 PM PST by TaxRelief (God bless America and God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack
This is nothing new in the UN.
12 posted on 03/25/2004 8:56:39 PM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MEG33; Huber
The UN is not a valid body. Instead of using veto power (which is passive-agressive), we need to just get it over-and-done with and pull out of the UN completely.
13 posted on 03/25/2004 9:39:09 PM PST by TaxRelief (God bless America and God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
The United States is the only nation on the Security Council that has not condemned the extra-judicial killing of Sheikh Yassin.

Why are we still there? *sigh*

14 posted on 03/25/2004 9:45:48 PM PST by lonevoice (Some things have to be believed to be seen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Their hoping they'll just explode into being, one day.
15 posted on 03/25/2004 9:55:36 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
Why is this building full of enemies of the U.S. in New York?
16 posted on 03/25/2004 9:57:24 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
France, Russia and Spain joined other council members that voted for the resolution.

The "illegal occupiers" of Corsica, Chechnya and Basque Country discover their moral voice.

17 posted on 03/25/2004 10:09:50 PM PST by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Israeli envoy Dan Gillerman would have helped matters along if he had strangled the Palestinian nazi SOB.
18 posted on 03/25/2004 11:00:03 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson