Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freeper Research - Richard Clarke campaign contribs - ONLY TO DEMOCRATS!
opensecrets.org ^ | 3/25/04 | adam_az

Posted on 03/25/2004 12:42:44 PM PST by adam_az

I searched on OpenSecrets.org, and it shows that Clarke gave $4000 over the last couple years... ALL TO DEMOCRATS. (detail below)

So much for his claims of being a "Republican."

This guy can't tell the truth about ANYTHING! Looks like Kerry found the perfect VP candidate.

CLARKE, RICHARD ARLINGTON,VA 22207 SELF-EMPLOYED/CONSULTANT 9/15/2003 $2,000 Metzl, Jamie (D-MO)

CLARKE, RICHARD ARLINGTON,VA 22207 U.S. GOVERNMENT/CIVAL SERVANT 11/7/2002 $1,000 Andreasen, Steven Peter (Democratic Farmer-Labor Party of Minnesota)

CLARKE, RICHARD ARLINGTON,VA 22207 U.S. GOVERNMENT/CIVAL SERVANT 7/22/2002 $1,000 Andreasen, Steven Peter (Democratic Farmer-Labor Party of Minnesota)


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: donors; opensecrets; richardclarke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: hoosiermama
But of course. He should not be commenting on his friend and business partner as an analyst. It is ridiculous.

Though not as ridiculous as Jamie Gorelick sitting on the commission rather than being grilled as a witness.

By the way where were James Woolsey and Louis Freeh? And why are Clinton and Gore testilying in closed session.

The good news is that the democrats are supporting Clarke with their standard position of "Republicans are not allowed to respond to attacks" lunacy.

It politicises Clarke and plays right into Dubyas hands. They're stupider than they look.

41 posted on 03/25/2004 1:51:21 PM PST by jwalsh07 (We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
MS. GORELICK: Mr. President, distinguished guests. Ten
years ago I would not have put cyber terrorism at the top of the
threats to our national security. But the landscape has changed.
Given how well-armed we are, as Josh said, as a nation, but how
reliant we are on computers in our everyday business and private
lives, our nation's cyber systems become a tremendous target.

Today a small group of technically sophisticated people
with nothing more than off-the-shelf computer equipment can get into,
can disrupt the computers and the Internet connections on which our
finance, telecommunications, power, water systems, emergency service
systems all depend.

Is this speculation? No, it is not. In exercise
eligible receiver, our Defense Department conducted a war game using
this technique and came to just that conclusion. And terrorists,
organized crime, drug cartels, as well as nation states are either
creating cybertech capabilities or are talking about using them. I
believe that cyberspace is the next battlefield for this nation.

Now, cyber terrorism may be a new issue to many
Americans, but it's not new to me and it's not new to this
administration. In 1995, our Attorney General asked me to chair a
critical infrastructure working group that brought together Justice
and Defense and the intelligence community to begin to address what
we saw as a new and emerging threat. The President then appointed a
commission on critical infrastructure protection whose advisory board
I co-chaired.

In response to his commission's work, last year the
President signed two directives -- to strengthen U.S. readiness to
meet unconventional threats to our nation, and to protect our
critical infrastructures. He appointed a national coordinator, Dick
Clarke, to review and handle and coordinate security infrastructure
protection and counterterrorism, and a national plan is under
development to ensure that America can defend itself in cyberspace.

Now, as part of that national plan I hope that we can
see action in a number of areas, three of which I see as particularly
pressing. The first, both the public and private sectors need to be
aware of the problem and the security measures that can be taken to
address it. I'd like to see the private sector work with the federal
government to make sure that we have enough people who are trained in
computer security, which we do not now have.

Second, we need to encourage ways for the government and
the private sector to share information on cyber intrusions and on
new techniques for preventing those intrusions, and responding to
them. A government-chartered, privately-run center could do this,
and also help develop standards for use in both industry and
government. This will complement the government's obligation to
ensure that we have the ability to respond as a nation to any attack.

Third, the companies that manage and assess risk for
private sector clients, like insurance companies and accounting
firms, need to focus on the risk that American businesses face from
cyber attacks. I'd like to see the widespread use of cyber security
best practices and standards as a tool of good business
management for every business.

I want to thank the President for his appreciation of
the threat and his commitment of resources to address it. And I will
urge the business community to respond in kind. This President has
always been sensitive to the promise of the Information Age, what it
can mean to students, what it can mean to families, to a world drawn
closer in many ways by the speed of communication. At the same time,
he knows that that promise comes with a price, and the price is
vigilance, because so much is at stake.

We're grateful for his leadership both in promoting the
cyber world and in protecting it.

Ladies and gentlemen, it is my honor and my personal
privilege to present to you the President of the United States.
(Applause.)

END



Where do you suppose Jamie Gorelick learned all about "cyber terrorism"? LOL

http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/program/news99/990122-wh2.htm

42 posted on 03/25/2004 1:55:51 PM PST by jwalsh07 (We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
Last time I had to declare my party loyalty it was to vote in the Virginia primary for president of the United States in the year 2000 and I asked for a Republican ballot.

Note it was the *primary* and it seems to me somebody uncovered a quote from Clarke confirming what would appear to be obvious: Clarke voted for McCain in the primary.

Whoop de dang doo. Somebody tell that dolt Norah O'Donnell that does not make Clarke an admitted Republican.

43 posted on 03/25/2004 1:56:44 PM PST by cyncooper ("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
Great job!

BTW- something tells me this isn't the last backstabbing Clinton holdover that will surface between now and election day...
44 posted on 03/25/2004 1:58:11 PM PST by LRS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
He said he voted for Bush. Any stats prior to 2002?

Did he say that? I thought he hedged and indicated he voted Republican in the *primary* and I swear somebody dug up a quote of him saying he voted McCain. If not, it seems to me the likely scenario. If he was really for him or not would still "not a Republican" make, since I well remember the dems across the nation voting McCain in order to bump Bush off. Didn't work! LOL

45 posted on 03/25/2004 2:00:04 PM PST by cyncooper ("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LRS
"BTW- something tells me this isn't the last backstabbing Clinton holdover that will surface between now and election day..."

We'll FReep those Benedict Arnolds, too!
46 posted on 03/25/2004 2:00:06 PM PST by adam_az (Call your state Republican party office and VOLUNTEER FOR A CAMPAIGN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
To Richard Clarke: Liar, liar, pants on fire.

No kidding... it's a 3-alarm blaze!


47 posted on 03/25/2004 2:00:38 PM PST by Charles Martel (Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All
WAIT A MINUTE!

Does this whole DNS Mess Up screw up links that we send to the press? What I mean is if they click on the link will it come up (Not Found?)
48 posted on 03/25/2004 2:06:41 PM PST by cmsgop (For Gosh Sake MCI, NO MORE JAMES TAYLOR !!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop
Use http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1105141/posts
49 posted on 03/25/2004 2:09:01 PM PST by adam_az (Call your state Republican party office and VOLUNTEER FOR A CAMPAIGN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
Cool! I did, Thanks
50 posted on 03/25/2004 2:10:18 PM PST by cmsgop (For Gosh Sake MCI, NO MORE JAMES TAYLOR !!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
What a "Beautiful Find"
51 posted on 03/25/2004 2:10:35 PM PST by syriacus (Clarke and Kerry found courage to speak out when they knew Dems would give them the Capitol mike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
Congrats. Thanks.

He must be one bitter sob.

. . . as well as a duplicitous idiot ideologue.
52 posted on 03/25/2004 2:13:54 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers; All
LOL

Check it out. I Googled "Richard Clarke voted for McCain" and my first hit is an article from Salon dated today by none other than (drumroll, please!) Sidney Blumenthal.

In addition to citing Clarke's "unimpeachable credibility" (I am literally LOL), he notes that Clarke voted for McCain in the 2000 primary as evidence of Clarke's oh-so-bipartisan attitude. I know some other source cited the same:

http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2004/03/25/clarke/index_np.html
53 posted on 03/25/2004 2:14:06 PM PST by cyncooper ("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Roger Cressey is the analyst hired by MSNBC to comment on the 9/11 Commission.

My!!

54 posted on 03/25/2004 2:14:06 PM PST by syriacus (Clarke and Kerry found courage to speak out when they knew Dems would give them the Capitol mike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
Don't miss my link at #53. None other than Sidney Blumenthal has penned an ode to Clarke for Salon.

55 posted on 03/25/2004 2:16:00 PM PST by cyncooper ("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
Just sent a note to Lugar with the information.....He needs to get a handle on it if he's going to have any semblance of bipartisanship on the committee.
56 posted on 03/25/2004 2:28:42 PM PST by hoosiermama (Wonder if Clarke will make enough on his book to pay for his legal fees for perjury?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
BIG BTTT!

Excellent work. I wonder why the mainstream media doesn't seem to be able to do this?

57 posted on 03/25/2004 2:33:39 PM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; Howlin; mhking
Thought you might want to see this when you get back on....or if your on....or...
58 posted on 03/25/2004 2:47:02 PM PST by hoosiermama (Wonder if Clarke will make enough on his book to pay for his legal fees for perjury?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; adam_az
BUMPing with HUGS.....fantastic research job!

59 posted on 03/25/2004 2:56:43 PM PST by JulieRNR21 (One good term deserves another! Take W-04....Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
It seems that we are the Mainstream Media Now......
60 posted on 03/25/2004 2:57:00 PM PST by cmsgop (For Gosh Sake MCI, NO MORE JAMES TAYLOR !!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson