Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The "Attack Bush" Hysteria (Ann Coulter 'positive ALERT')
FrontPage Magazine ^ | 3/25/04 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 03/25/2004 4:52:30 AM PST by harpu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2004 4:52:30 AM PST by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: harpu
You know the rules!
2 posted on 03/25/2004 4:58:53 AM PST by Crazieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
Ann has got to stop pulling her punches! LOL!
3 posted on 03/25/2004 4:59:01 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (You can see it coming like a train on a track.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
When will people understand the difference?

A. Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice

B. Jocelyn Elders, Theresa McKinney

The democrats rely on the stupidity of the masses, both in their leaders and voters.
4 posted on 03/25/2004 4:59:10 AM PST by gortklattu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
"Maxine Waters – a woman whose face is no stranger to confusion or befuddlement:

One of the gems in this piece.
5 posted on 03/25/2004 4:59:31 AM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
Ann Rules!!!!!!!
6 posted on 03/25/2004 5:01:32 AM PST by bogdanPolska12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
In strict accordance with the FreeRepublic by laws,
paragraph 4, section 7, stating that, and I quote:
"any mention of our beloved Ann Coulter
must include her image", I offer the following
pictures for your exclusive viewing pleasure.






Carville really IS gollum.

7 posted on 03/25/2004 5:02:27 AM PST by ChadGore (kwitchyurbellyakin or bailthehellout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
"You know the rules!" Ah yes, as a newbie, I do understand "the rules of Coulter!"
8 posted on 03/25/2004 5:02:29 AM PST by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: harpu
If a Republican ever claimed the "facial expression" on Maxine Waters – a woman whose face is no stranger to confusion or befuddlement – left the "impression" that she didn't understand quantum physics, he'd be in prison for committing a hate crim

LMAO!

9 posted on 03/25/2004 5:02:42 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
She is brilliant, she is brilliant, she is brilliant. And in addition to that, she is brilliant. There is no way we are worthy. No way.
10 posted on 03/25/2004 5:04:51 AM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
Beautiful mind. Ann punches out another Brick in the Wall of propaganda. Outstanding post. Thanks.
11 posted on 03/25/2004 5:06:31 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
As long as you have been a member in good standing and you don't abide by the Ann Coulter posting rules. tch tch tch.

WE WANT PICS!

12 posted on 03/25/2004 5:08:57 AM PST by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
"No doubt Dr. Rice was staring at Clarke in astonishment as he imparted this great insight: Keep an eye on al-Qaida! We've done nothing, but you should do something about it."

Ann hits another one out of the park!
13 posted on 03/25/2004 5:10:21 AM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
That look of perplexity Clarke saw was Condi thinking to herself: "Hmmm, did I demote this guy far enough?"

Bullseye!

14 posted on 03/25/2004 5:11:11 AM PST by Gritty ("Clinton’s failure to get bin Laden is one of the most serious failures in US history-Monsoor Ijaz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
Well if the Clinton WH can get Alrich banned with a phone call then Bush ought to DEMAND 60 minutes give Cheney and Rice as much time as they gave BLOWHARD

And the WH ought to make an issue out the no airing of Aldrich's claims as well as Paterson's DELECITION OF DUTY
15 posted on 03/25/2004 5:12:02 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
This ain't the last we'll see of attacks against Bush. The Dems haven't been sitting on their hands since they lost in 2000.

Look for more "bombshells" all the way to November.

16 posted on 03/25/2004 5:12:22 AM PST by FReepaholic (Never Forget: www.september-11-videos.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
LOL--this was good, but I think Ann's holding back...
17 posted on 03/25/2004 5:13:55 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
Ann Coulter should be required reading for everyone...especially Democrats!

I want to say something I havne't seen elsewhere: I think these hearings are a strong argument for not changing administrations during this dangerous time, and I think Americans will "get it", without being told.

Thanks to these hearings,we know how long transitions take, how long for important people to get onboard, and how long issues take to be resolved, a new president coming into office could be dangerous...very dangerous...to our national security! We need to keep Bush right where he is.....and unintentionally, Richard Clarke proved that yesterday.

btw....Clarke is a lying weasel. CNN anchor Bill Hemmer, just told viewers that last night, Clarke told Larry King that if Condy Rice had done her job, 9-11 could have been prevented. But under oath yesterday, Clarke said that no matter what the Bush administration did in the 9 months preceding 9-ll, it still would have happened.

18 posted on 03/25/2004 5:16:06 AM PST by YaYa123 (@Richard Drama Queen Clarke...Despicable!com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
Clarke's flip-flop can be easily explained.

Someone obviously gave him a heads-up that HE would be the fall guy if events proved the Clinton Administration's negligence in protecting our country. Thus the book. He is simply protecting himself against what he knows the Clinton crooks, with the help of the complicit media, can and will do to him.

19 posted on 03/25/2004 5:18:38 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I do have a criticism of Ann. (ducking)

She herself was the person who popularized the phrase "sarcastic quotation marks."

Yet, she still uses the word "liberal" to describe the left wing fascists of this country without using said sarcastic quotation marks.

I'll have to write her a note.
20 posted on 03/25/2004 5:18:41 AM PST by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson