Skip to comments.
The Clark Effect- another Leftover from The Decade of Frauds
various FR links
| 03-25-04
| The Heavy Equipment Guy
Posted on 03/25/2004 12:56:18 AM PST by backhoe
Fox is ripping Clarke to shreds right now.
The Democrats may gloat today, but I will wager the door will hit them square on their noses later, and this "Get Bush out of office" investigation won't have the political leverage in November that the Democrats are hoping for. Matter of fact, most of the voters are probably not even paying attention to the blatant partisanship by the commission members and the attacks from those like Clarke going on in these hearings. We have to remember this, we're a long way from November.
They think we are just stupid. I am sitting here nearly speechless. The reporters haven't read what is right in our hands and are trying to pretend it is just spin. It isn't spin. The things he said is 2002 are factually correct, he doesn't deny them, and they completely destroy their entire case. On WLS in Chicago, normally quite conservative on these things, they are parroting in a slow drone this "ferocious attack" talking point - when they lose utterly, ignore the substance and claim that losing is all the other guy's fault for being meanspirited for showing they are wrong. They think we can't read.
It appears to me the plan is to try and smear Pres. Bush and Co. as much as possible so as to be able to moderate back to a fall back position of: "well there is plenty of blame to go around therefore we won't blame anybody." It sickens me to know that is what they are going to do.
CLARKE IN 92: BUSH WAS LAX ON IRAQ
The Washington Post (BRIEF EXCERPT ONLY, IN COMPLIANCE WITH COPYRIGHT LAW AND LAT/WP VS FR] | JUNE 5, 1992 | R. Jeffrey Smith
It's really over for the Dems, isn't it? Ordinary people do research on the WWW and Fox News picks up the story. No more media blackouts...
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: backhoe; clarke; richardclarke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
1
posted on
03/25/2004 12:56:18 AM PST
by
backhoe
To: backhoe
Thanks for the links - nice work.
2
posted on
03/25/2004 1:54:24 AM PST
by
ThePythonicCow
(Defeat J Frondeur Kerry)
To: backhoe
Thank you also. THIS IS WAR! UNBELIEVABLE WHAT A LIAR THIS MAN CLARKE IS!
To: AmericanMade1776; ThePythonicCow
Thanks for looking.
The "other side" simply has no honesty, no honor left.
It used to be that the opposition occupied a somewhat different position ( more government ) and you could disagree or argue the point- now, they just lie, spin, change stories or positions endlessly, shout down, talk over, and tell tall tales.
4
posted on
03/25/2004 3:13:22 AM PST
by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: backhoe
Clarke is a piece of work. While he said yesterday he did not work for JFKerry, guess that means not collecting money, he as a counter-terriorism "specialists" knows very well who his "book" supports.
Could it be that it is Hillry that he takes orders from?
To: All
6
posted on
03/25/2004 3:21:32 AM PST
by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: backhoe
Great links...thanks!
7
posted on
03/25/2004 3:31:12 AM PST
by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
To: lainde
Thanks for looking!
8
posted on
03/25/2004 3:44:51 AM PST
by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: backhoe
What still Amazes me , is how Democrats repond to lies ,like Pyrhanna after fresh meat
To: backhoe
"It's really over for the Dems, isn't it? Ordinary people do research on the WWW and Fox News picks up the story. No more media blackouts..."
Surely asking too much but I want to see Clarke's letter/earlier interview et al on the front pages of the NYT;Washington Post - Lib Media et al; including a '60 Minutes' segment where they eat Clarke's dirt.
In the meantime, share a grattitue for all those who hold to the value of 'Truth' and for those Media outlets who will share it.
. . . 'the net' and Free Republic, notwithstanding!
10
posted on
03/25/2004 6:04:18 AM PST
by
cricket
To: backhoe; lainde
"Great links...thanks!"
. . .and dittos to that lainde!
11
posted on
03/25/2004 6:06:50 AM PST
by
cricket
To: cricket
Thanks for looking- the story is getting out, Hannity & Rush have been beating on it.
After hearing Rush's summary yesterday, my largely apolitical wife said
"Well, he could have saved a lot of words and just said 'another lying Clintonista...'"
12
posted on
03/25/2004 6:13:27 AM PST
by
backhoe
(The 1990's? The Decade of Fraud(s)...)
To: backhoe
Excellent. Thank you. b
13
posted on
03/25/2004 6:46:38 AM PST
by
Barset
To: All
14
posted on
03/25/2004 7:11:49 AM PST
by
backhoe
(The 1990's? The Decade of Fraud(s)...)
To: Barset
Thanks for looking.
15
posted on
03/25/2004 7:15:55 AM PST
by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: All
16
posted on
03/25/2004 8:12:49 AM PST
by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: All
17
posted on
03/25/2004 8:26:01 AM PST
by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: backhoe
I gathered some old threads on him, mostly about the Time magazine article and his background rebuttal that Angle revealed
HERE.
I think he was the source for that 2002 Time article, leaking to the press in an attempt to get ahead. What a self-centered loser.
18
posted on
03/25/2004 8:41:11 AM PST
by
mrsmith
("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
To: mrsmith
Thanks- very helpful!
19
posted on
03/25/2004 9:14:56 AM PST
by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: backhoe
20
posted on
03/25/2004 11:07:46 AM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi Mac ... Support Our Troops! ... Thrash the demRats in November!!! ... Beat BoXer!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
