Skip to comments.
..WOOLSEY on FoX = "CLARKE doesn't listen to others"..
FoX News Channel 'On the Record' with Gretta VanSustren ^
| 3/24/2004
| JAMES WOOLSEY
Posted on 03/24/2004 8:08:37 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE
NEVER FORGET
...Former CIA Director JAMES WOOLSEY was just on the FoX News Channel's 'On the Record' Show with GRETTA VanSUSTREN.
2 outstanding quotes re 911 Commission Hearings:
"Understanding the Past is a piece of understanding the Future"
"CLARKE does not listen to others once he locks onto a single point of view. Case in point would be the case for state-sponsored terrorism that CIA Director TENANT laid out before the 911 Commission today that CLARKE disagreed with"
...WOOLSEY = A man on a mission for CLARITY. ...CLARKE = A man on a mission for CONFUSION.
NEVER FORGET
TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: 911commission; clarity; clarke; confusion; foxnews; jameswoolsey; richardclarke; tenet; woolsey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: kristinn
salinger79
Since Mar 25, 2004
/hint
21
posted on
03/24/2004 8:52:01 PM PST
by
OneTime
To: ALOHA RONNIE
I have to say, I feel for those who don't have FNC on their cable systems in this country. I've been watching the other news outlets this evening for a change, and one without FNC would get the impression Clarke fell on the sword in the White House and is being heralded as the wounded hero, rather than the incompetant former government employee he is.
22
posted on
03/24/2004 8:52:06 PM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: ALOHA RONNIE
Thanks, Ronnie. Just doing my job here in D.C. We'll be out again tomorrow at the Rat fundraiser with John Kerry and Bill Clinton.
23
posted on
03/24/2004 8:52:12 PM PST
by
kristinn
To: salinger79
Trolling down the river
On a Sunday afternoon.....
tra la la
Leni
24
posted on
03/24/2004 8:52:52 PM PST
by
MinuteGal
(Paradise is not lost ! You'll find it May 22 aboard "FReeps Ahoy 3". Register now for our cruise.)
To: salinger79
Molly? Molly Ivins, is that you?
Welcome to Free Republic :^)
25
posted on
03/24/2004 8:53:43 PM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: OneTime
Doesn't matter to me. He asked a question so I answered it. If he's a troll, he'll be zotted in good time.
26
posted on
03/24/2004 8:53:46 PM PST
by
kristinn
To: kristinn
Freep the Hardball cameras if you can. Hardball is going to be at that dinner tomorrow.
27
posted on
03/24/2004 8:54:15 PM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: Ken H
I agree...
28
posted on
03/24/2004 8:55:04 PM PST
by
binger
To: salinger79
clarke served three republican presidents and was last registered as a republican. Is nothing he says valid? Well like Kerry it all depends on which version you believe. Like Kerry, Clarke has two stories for every subject.
29
posted on
03/24/2004 8:55:30 PM PST
by
Texasforever
(I am all flamed out.)
To: salinger79
Yes, nothing he says is valid, when provided with historical references he's attached to, dating back to the start of the Bush administration. His book is a pack of lies, and he knows it.
30
posted on
03/24/2004 8:55:53 PM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: BigSkyFreeper
Thanks for the tip. We'll keep an eye out for Chris Matthews.
31
posted on
03/24/2004 8:57:50 PM PST
by
kristinn
To: Ann Archy
I saw this guy on CNBC tonight. He is one bitter person. How do such unbalanced people get jobs in the government?
32
posted on
03/24/2004 8:59:23 PM PST
by
Bombard
To: salinger79
"But really isn't it at least the tinest bit troubling when two major figures like Paul o'neil and clarke start saying things that corroborate eachother?"
They've both given conflicting statements publicly, under oath, and in writing, prior to coming out against Bush. One has to question why these individuals have flip-flopped. Hell, Condi Rice said she had lunch with Clarke several weeks after he'd resigned his post. Was the sneaky bastard trying to get some new dirt out of her? Pretend he's a friend and then stab her in the back? Why have lunch with someone you hate? Frankly, I'd be more willing to believe them if they hadn't been so supportive of the Bush White House before they penned their books. Consistency means alot to me. It goes along with credibility and O'Neill and Clarke have neither.
33
posted on
03/24/2004 8:59:24 PM PST
by
mass55th
To: binger
Thanks. Forgot to add that they all have that same predatory look about them as well.
34
posted on
03/24/2004 9:04:43 PM PST
by
Ken H
To: salinger79
I understand you all like Bush and all. Your option off course. Help me understand though how everyone just simply discounts information from people who disagree with the administration. Some of Clarke's "facts" are not real. He doesn't tell you what a person has said that's damning, he tells you what he thinks they were thinking that was damning.
For instance, let's say Condi turned and said "nice day". Most folks would take her words at face value and assume she meant "nice day". Clark would ignore the words, look at her expression or her eyebrows, or whatever and "read" bizarre false meaning into her comment. Clark might say, "she said "nice day" but I could tell she wanted to tell me she didn't understand her job". Or that she wanted to fly or whatever. In other words, Clark doesn't tell us about Condi, he tells us about his own twisted projections.
35
posted on
03/24/2004 9:06:38 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(NFL Owners: Grown men don't watch hollywood peep shows with wives and children.)
To: NormsRevenge
This guy Cressy is tied to so many terror failures he should be investigated. It seem they are trying to ease their failures by trying shift the blame to others. Both Cressy and Clarke are the common factor in the ten to twelve years of failure to deal with the terror threat. They and not the past administrations are the ones at fault for not doing a more effective job in procting the USA.
36
posted on
03/24/2004 9:07:16 PM PST
by
Bombard
To: salinger79
I understand you all like Bush and all. Your option off course. Help me understand though how everyone just simply discounts information from people who disagree with the administration. Some of Clarke's "facts" are not real. He doesn't tell you what a person has said that's damning, he tells you what he thinks they were thinking that was damning.
For instance, let's say Condi turned and said "nice day". Most would take her words at face value and assume she meant "nice day".
Clark would ignore the words, look at her expression or her eyebrows, or whatever and "read" bizarre false meaning into her comment. Clark might say, "she said "nice day" but I could tell she wanted to tell me she didn't understand her job". Or that she wanted to fly or whatever. In other words, Clark doesn't tell us about Condi, he tells us about his own projections.
IMHO It's easy to discount a true narcissist -- because whatever they say -- it's always about them.
37
posted on
03/24/2004 9:11:19 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(NFL Owners: Grown men don't watch hollywood peep shows with wives and children.)
To: everyone
o.k. I see I am not going to get anywhere by debating this whole deal with clarke. But I did recieve about two decent replys that made me pause for half a sec or so but I came to my senses. I guess my real question is "is there any legitmate complaint by anyone on the left against Bush or is he really just that perfect?" I can admitt to at least one or two legitmate complaints aginst some of my lefty, commie, hypiee dippie, tree hugging types that I love and admire by some of the necon types on the right. Surly there must be something about Bush? Any fair and balanced types out there on the right?
38
posted on
03/24/2004 9:16:26 PM PST
by
salinger79
(Come on be truthful to yourselves.)
To: ALOHA RONNIE
Don't know if I've told you before, but thanks for your service to this country. God bless you.
To: ALOHA RONNIE; kristinn
GREAT GOING KRISTINN.
THANKS TONS ON BEHALF OF ALL US FR TYPES WHO LOVE OUR REPUBLIC!
40
posted on
03/24/2004 9:23:20 PM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson