To: js1138
I don't think this topic is too "tin-foil" at all.
I've reviewed a lot of information related to TWA 800 over the years, and I've reached one basic conclusion: IF the aircraft was shot down, it was not done by terrorists -- it was an accidental shoot-down by a U.S. Navy vessel or NATO warship conducting exercises off the south shore of Long Island that night.
11 posted on
03/24/2004 4:49:28 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE north strong and free.)
To: Alberta's Child
A heat seaking missle would have probably hit one of the engines. I don't see how an SA7 could have done it.
15 posted on
03/24/2004 4:58:00 PM PST by
U S Army EOD
(John Kerry, the mother of all flip floppers.)
To: Alberta's Child
That would also not look good on clinton's resume. Have you considered the posibility, however, that TWA 800 was in the time slot allocated for an Israeli Airliner? Do you really believe that terrorists with technical assistance from Iraq or Iran could not have done it?
17 posted on
03/24/2004 4:59:59 PM PST by
js1138
To: Alberta's Child
You've decided that either US or NATO shot down flt 800.
When exactly did the South Shore of LI, home of one of the world's most heavily populated flight paths, become a Naval Live Fire Range?
20 posted on
03/24/2004 5:01:52 PM PST by
wtc911
(Doesn't matter if your head is in the sand or up your a**, the view is the same.)
To: Alberta's Child
NATO warships off the coast of LI?? What the hell are you thinking?
27 posted on
03/24/2004 5:07:27 PM PST by
petercooper
(I actually did vote for the $87 Billion, before I voted against it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson