Skip to comments.
Clarke's complicity in crash cover-up
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| March 24, 2004
| Jack Cashill
Posted on 03/24/2004 4:31:03 PM PST by js1138
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
Admins. Feel free to delete if this is too tin-foil.
I don't know what caused TWA 800, but I'm pretty sure the video produced under Clarke's direction is bogus.
1
posted on
03/24/2004 4:31:04 PM PST
by
js1138
To: Admin Moderator
I don't know if this is a forbidden topic.
2
posted on
03/24/2004 4:31:50 PM PST
by
js1138
To: js1138
New York City, October 23, 1995: "For the first time since the dawn of the nuclear age, there's not a single solitary nuclear missile pointed at the people of the United States of America."
Concord, New Hampshire, February 2, 1996: ". . . for the first time since the dawn of the nuclear age, there is not a single nuclear missile pointed at an American child today."
Philadelphia, April 26, 1996: ". . . for the first time since the dawn of the nuclear age, there is not a single, solitary nuclear missile pointed at an American child tonight."
Toledo, Ohio, August 26, 1996: ". . . for the first time since the dawn of the nuclear age, on this night, this beautiful night, there is not a single nuclear missile pointed at a child in the United States of America."
And so on: In Nashville, Washington, Iowa City, New Orleans, Coral Gables, San Francisco, Santa Monica, St. Louis; Ashland, Kentucky; Sun City, Arizona; Hartford, Connecticut -- even in a telephone speech to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the very people who would coordinate disaster relief in the event of a nuclear attack. Mr. Clinton is not alone in making this mistake.
Vice President Al Gore echoed the president in his carefully rehearsed speech to the 1996 Democratic National Convention: "Our strength at home has led to renewed respect abroad: nuclear missiles no longer pointed at our cities. . . ." No clear tie to Russia.
3
posted on
03/24/2004 4:34:33 PM PST
by
Toespi
(,)
To: js1138
What makes you think this topic is forbidd.....UGH...SLUMP!
4
posted on
03/24/2004 4:38:39 PM PST
by
JOE6PAK
("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
To: js1138
...but I'm pretty sure the video produced under Clarke's direction is bogus. What? Do you doubt that a plane going 500+ mph with its nose torn off would continue to climb a couple of thousand feet? You're just too cynical. Nothing wrong at all with the aerodynamics of that scenario.
To: js1138
Was TWA800 really 4 days before Clinton's re-election?
6
posted on
03/24/2004 4:42:34 PM PST
by
spyone
To: spyone
No, it was four months.
7
posted on
03/24/2004 4:46:59 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE north strong and free.)
To: js1138
INCREDIBLE!!!
8
posted on
03/24/2004 4:47:04 PM PST
by
Enduring Freedom
(Guess How We Ended Japanese Kamikaze Attacks?)
To: spyone
Doesn't look like it from the article. July 1996? That's four months. A terrorist attack could have cost him the election, however. A reverse Spain.
9
posted on
03/24/2004 4:47:13 PM PST
by
js1138
To: JOE6PAK
Ooops! Call the coroner, Joe's over in the back, and to the left...
10
posted on
03/24/2004 4:48:25 PM PST
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: js1138
I don't think this topic is too "tin-foil" at all.
I've reviewed a lot of information related to TWA 800 over the years, and I've reached one basic conclusion: IF the aircraft was shot down, it was not done by terrorists -- it was an accidental shoot-down by a U.S. Navy vessel or NATO warship conducting exercises off the south shore of Long Island that night.
11
posted on
03/24/2004 4:49:28 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE north strong and free.)
To: js1138
Definitely not.
To: js1138
A reverse Spain...my GOD!...Clinton lies to the world to save his sorry ass...no wonder we'll never hear about this in the press, everyone expects it from him...just lies about sex, no big deal...just lies about mass murder, no big deal...just politics.
13
posted on
03/24/2004 4:52:43 PM PST
by
spyone
To: js1138
All those plane downed during the 1990s, and explained as "mechanical failure" was something I picked up soon after 9/11. Too many crashes, none of the pilots expressing distress, and that one pilot hailing Allah.
I also was not suprised that the sudden "mechanical failures" ceased after we finally address the war on terrorism.
Yes, some think it's tin foil, but I don't.
14
posted on
03/24/2004 4:54:33 PM PST
by
mabelkitty
(A tuning, a Vote in the topic package to the starting US presidency election fight)
To: Alberta's Child
A heat seaking missle would have probably hit one of the engines. I don't see how an SA7 could have done it.
15
posted on
03/24/2004 4:58:00 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(John Kerry, the mother of all flip floppers.)
To: js1138; *TWA800_list; Admin Moderator
How can it be a forbidden topic if there's a bump list in its name?
Hi _Jim!!
16
posted on
03/24/2004 4:59:53 PM PST
by
coloradan
(Hence, etc.)
To: Alberta's Child
That would also not look good on clinton's resume. Have you considered the posibility, however, that TWA 800 was in the time slot allocated for an Israeli Airliner? Do you really believe that terrorists with technical assistance from Iraq or Iran could not have done it?
17
posted on
03/24/2004 4:59:59 PM PST
by
js1138
To: mabelkitty
You're right -- there were there a lot of those "mechanical failure" incidents. I determined that most of the findings were a total hoax when I realized that
all of them involved international flights out of John F. Kennedy Airport in New York City -- including TWA Flight 800, the SwissAir flight that crashed off the coast of Newfoundland, the Egypt Air flight that crashed while the pilot was
praying to Allah saying grace before dinner, and American Airlines (I think) Flight 587 (about two months after 9/11).
Anyone who flies out of that airport in light of all these "accidents" ought to get a head examination.
18
posted on
03/24/2004 5:00:40 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE north strong and free.)
To: spyone
Clinton had already gotten away with covering up Oklahoma City. He had no reason to think he couldn't pull it off again.
To: Alberta's Child
You've decided that either US or NATO shot down flt 800.
When exactly did the South Shore of LI, home of one of the world's most heavily populated flight paths, become a Naval Live Fire Range?
20
posted on
03/24/2004 5:01:52 PM PST
by
wtc911
(Doesn't matter if your head is in the sand or up your a**, the view is the same.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson