Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/24/2004 2:09:04 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oldeconomybuyer
read later
2 posted on 03/24/2004 2:16:57 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Good article!

"It’s a general rule of management that you never demote anybody important: You fire them, and fast, or else they will sabotage your organization."

I've seen the sabotage that results, myself.
3 posted on 03/24/2004 2:19:19 PM PST by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ( President Bush 3-20-04))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Good summary of the book without having to waste time or money on it.

Interesting about the opinion of Frum that one of Bush's mistakes was not firing Clarke. I agree. The campaign Bush ran was that he wanted to bring a new tone to the White House and work with the Dems (the Enemy Within). I think GW underestimated the evil that was brought in under the Clinton administration. With the short transition period and the way the election went down, he probably felt like he would be compassionate and let these guys keep their jobs at a lower level. Bad idea.

Good summary and the truth will prevail in the long run. Clarke will be found out as an opportunist and a sell out to Clinton and the Dems.
4 posted on 03/24/2004 2:23:16 PM PST by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I really believe that the Dems thought that this 9/11 Commission and these books would sink GW Bush. I think GW's poll numbers will definitely go down the next month but then they will bounce back as soon as the truth is revealed. Bin Laden will be caught in the next few months, Kerry will keep imploding and Bush will still run a flawless Presidential campaign with the world as well as the leftist news media against him. He will win and thank God be our President until 2008.
5 posted on 03/24/2004 2:27:11 PM PST by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I am dismayed, depressed, distressed, and mad as hell, about the trashing of President Bush though the auspices of the 911 commission, and Richard Clarke. Mr. Clarke has been proved to be a fraud and a liar, and he was treated like a rock star today. Instead of tough questions about the comments Fox News released today via an audiotape (with White House approval) former Senator Bob Kerry made the comment: "Perhaps Fox should change their slogan to "Fair and Balanced occasionally", which was interrupted by loud cheers from the audience.

Apparently, no one cared to question Clarke about "praising President Bush" on the audiotape, and bashing him in his book. Instead, they just bashed Fox News.

Also, less than a week ago, the liberals were calling the President a "cowboy shooting from the hip". Now, they say he didn't do enough, and didn't protect us from the terrorists.

Is it my imagination, or has President Bush been the world leader in fighting terrorists, while Bill Clinton was doing nothing more than "swatting" at flies???

Am I losing my mind, or are the liberals REALLY this desperate for power, that they would weaken our Commander-in-Chief during the War on Terror????

God help us all, if these people get back into power. They will stop at nothing. And that is a frightening thought. VERY frightening!!

My only hope is that the American people see these Bush Bashers for what they are. DANGEROUS LEFT WING NUTS !!!
6 posted on 03/24/2004 2:29:46 PM PST by GeorgeW23225 (Liberals really aren't bad people. It's just that they know so much that simply ISN'T true!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
God bless David Frum. If anyone hasn't read, "The Right Man", you should.
9 posted on 03/24/2004 2:43:13 PM PST by Keith (IT'S ABOUT THE JUDGES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
...makes you wonder whether the United States had a president at all between 1993 and 2001...

We didn't have a president during those years. We had an overgrown, aging '60's-era party boy. Someone who never developed past the "if it feels good, do it" mantra of the hippies. However, the party boy always was a cunning opportunist, who, himself, never had any true core ideology. But coming from a Dem-controlled state, he found a way to insinuate himself into that state's power structure, and the rest is sorry history.

If we make the monumental mistake of electing another overgrown, aging, '60's era Dem, this time we'll be getting one who really is driven by Leftist ideology. In terms of selling this country out to the international Left, Kerry would make Clinton look like a choir boy.

10 posted on 03/24/2004 2:43:29 PM PST by Wolfstar (Yo, "real" conservatives. Spain's election is clear. Jihadists are on Kerry's side. Are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
While I agree with most of what Frum writes, Dick Clarke was a holdover of the Reagan and Bush administrations that *Clinton* kept over. How was George W. Bush to know that this registered Republican, who had worked in both Reagan and Bush I White Houses, had turned to the "dark side" during the Stainmaker's reign.
13 posted on 03/24/2004 3:00:07 PM PST by HateBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Early on, the Bush team made a fateful decision about Clarke

Friggin' A. Learn a lesson Bush. See what being a partisan nice guy gets you (and us taxpayers; how much will this 6 month hatchet job cost the taxpayers)

If you are able to win a second term, better clean the Executive branch of the hang-over Clintoon Rats.

14 posted on 03/24/2004 3:03:19 PM PST by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
`Was Simon & Schuster the publisher of Hillary Clinton's fiction? Is it also the publisher of Bill Clinton's history revision?
19 posted on 03/24/2004 5:17:33 PM PST by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson