To: Howlin
Yes, this is a great bombshell but we will probably not see it anywhere other than Fox. I am really afraid that Clarke's testimony will prove to be the undoing for Bush. Also, why the heck won't Condi Rice appear before the panel?
561 posted on
03/24/2004 11:20:39 AM PST by
dormee
To: dormee; gswilder
I am really afraid that Clarke's testimony will prove to be the undoing for Bush. Also, why the heck won't Condi Rice appear before the panel? Another naysayer. You and gswilder ought to get a room.
566 posted on
03/24/2004 11:23:03 AM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
To: dormee
I believe she is but not in a public session.
567 posted on
03/24/2004 11:25:19 AM PST by
WHBates
To: dormee
From what I understand Condi has already given 4 hours of testimony to the panel. Since her position is still as in active NSA director, there are many things that cannot be discussed in public. The Democrats can get anything they want answered from her at anytime, but would prefer to humiliate her in public.
569 posted on
03/24/2004 11:26:30 AM PST by
cwb
(Kerry: The only person who could make Bill Clinton look like a moderate.)
To: dormee
Why the heck won't Condi appear before the panel?
because it would break precedent... I have a friend who worked in the U.S. Senate for many years and he explained it to me: Condi is part of Bush's STAFF. Direct insider. Rummy and Powell are not part of Bush's STAFF. They are in a different category. It's a world of difference which category these folks are in as to protocol and precendent concerning this. That's why she's not appearing.
597 posted on
03/24/2004 11:53:32 AM PST by
IPWGOP
('tooning the truth)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson