Skip to comments.
Clarke in '02: Bush Admin Began Counterterror Plan in Jan. '01 (Clarke Caught!Fox Exclusive!)
FoxNews ^
| 24 Mar 04
| Jim Angle
Posted on 03/24/2004 8:43:56 AM PST by xzins
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:39:17 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2002; 60; a; al; bush; cbs; clarke; clarketestimony; clinton; foxnews; interview; jimangle; minutes; news; qaeda; richard; richardclarke; rogercressey; terror; transcript
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 781-788 next last
To: cyncooper
NO I missed it. I don't know who is who cuz I just turned on the tv because of this thread...
141
posted on
03/24/2004 9:14:15 AM PST
by
Freedom2specul8
(Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
To: shezza
lol! That's funny! I just sent a ping out to you not a few minutes earlier about it on another thread! Great minds!
To: Howlin
ditto on the ditto
a real bombshell.
To: GOPrincess
CBS has sunk to the level of the National Enquirer . . . no, make that the Weekly World News with it's pics of space aliens shaking hands with Clinton.
144
posted on
03/24/2004 9:15:06 AM PST
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: xzins
Far different from what he said to Charlie Rose...
Hes just jockeying for democrat largess as in a job or something else.. Probably for a job.. The state dept. is full of this type.. and at lower position probably most of the other arms of the federal gov't too..
Demos love federal jobs.. the Government Workers Union is one of the the most radical leftist orgaizations out there. Should be outlawed or at the least investigated and then exposed.. No matter the President they are for democrats because they are mostly democrats and RINOS. Foreign terrorists have not the total impact on this country as they do.. Its damned near impossible for anybody, anybody, to fire one of them either.
To: el_texicano
Rush is on top of this and is listing everything that proves Clarke to be a liar-scum-of-the-earth, self-serving bureaucrat!
146
posted on
03/24/2004 9:16:05 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: roses of sharon
Why can't everyone realize that Clarke's assertions have already been publized as fact all day Sunday, in promos during the Basketball games. BINGO... bears repeating... typical Leftist methodology:
1. Make wild accusation
2. Make wide distribution of accusation in Leftist Media
3. When accused defends themselves, accuse them of attacking the messenger
4. If and when the record is cleared, minimize distribution of facts.
147
posted on
03/24/2004 9:16:15 AM PST
by
So Cal Rocket
(If consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, John F. Kerry’s mind must be freaking enormous)
To: Steve_Seattle
Clear something up for me...can't
Clarke keep ranting on about one
thing?...that Bush diverted from
al-Qaeda to Saddam at some point?
Based on Bush asking Clarke after
9-11 to "find out if Iraq did it",
and then the later attack on Iraq.
Note this briefing only deals with
pre-9/11.
Or is it just deadly to Clarke's
credibility, so he's shown a liar?
To: Defender2
Got the hearings on in the background... I've got to start homeschooling lessons pretty soon (have the kidlets working on spelling while I'm bouncing from FR to the TV to Rush...) but I figure them listening to some of this going on is "history" and a lesson in media bias, even if they don't get the whole picture yet. :)
149
posted on
03/24/2004 9:16:29 AM PST
by
GOPrincess
(Jim Angle...My Hero!!)
To: Mr. Mojo
Yep, but let's see if it's reported in the Slimes. Maybe we better send the transcripts to the slimes!!!!
150
posted on
03/24/2004 9:16:33 AM PST
by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift mine eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
To: xzins
QUESTION: Were all of those issues part of alleged plan that was late December and the Clinton team decided not to pursue because it was too close to ... CLARKE: There was never a plan, Andrea. What there was was these two things: One, a description of the existing strategy, which included a description of the threat. And two, those things which had been looked at over the course of two years, and which were still on the table.
QUESTION: So there was nothing that developed, no documents or no new plan of any sort?
CLARKE: There was no new plan.
QUESTION: No new strategy I mean, I don't want to get into a semantics ...
CLARKE: Plan, strategy there was no, nothing new.
QUESTION: 'Til late December, developing ...
CLARKE: What happened at the end of December was that the Clinton administration NSC principals committee met and once again looked at the strategy, and once again looked at the issues that they had brought, decided in the past to add to the strategy. But they did not at that point make any recommendations.
QUESTIONS: Had those issues evolved at all from October of '98 'til December of 2000?
CLARKE: Had they evolved? Um, not appreciably.
~snip~
Um, would that be Andrea Mitchell? She who has been acting like the Clarke book is credible?
151
posted on
03/24/2004 9:16:45 AM PST
by
cyncooper
("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
To: Quix
Yeah, Maddddd-lie-line Allllldull sounded like a vain idiot, too.
I saw a clip of her on Fox the other evening, and you could almost tell she was lying. She tried not to look at the camera, as if she had something to hide. I finally had to look away from the TV. She is so scary looking. Almost as bad as Janet el' Reneo.
152
posted on
03/24/2004 9:16:49 AM PST
by
Arrowhead1952
(The phrase "truthful democrat" is an oxymoron!)
To: Defender2
Fantastic! Thanks for the ping!
To: Howlin; MeekOneGOP; null and void; Darksheare; Mo1; rintense; ohioWfan; Servant of the 9; ...
Thanks for the ping, Howlin!
Everybody come and see this!
Clarke is TOAST!
154
posted on
03/24/2004 9:17:06 AM PST
by
Pippin
(Each day is a gift from God. ---That's why it's called the PRESENT!)
To: GOPrincess
60 min, 212-975-3247
To: roses of sharon
Gracias. I will try to put in a call later this morning.
156
posted on
03/24/2004 9:18:00 AM PST
by
GOPrincess
(Jim Angle...My Hero!!)
To: xzins
Too funny.
I'll bet our trolls are enjoying this story.
To: Indy Pendance
#153. Your Welcome!!!!:-)
158
posted on
03/24/2004 9:18:29 AM PST
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: Lyford
One of us mis-heard. I think he was actually slamming the Bush administration in general, and Condi Rice in particular, for saying that they had changed the approach to Al-quaeda, and developed a plan for dealing with it. He absolutely has savaged the Clinton administration, but I think his comments this morning were aimed at the Bush administration plan.I heard it exactly as you did.
On another note, I wonder if the commission will be briefed before Dick arrives for his ever so important two hours.
159
posted on
03/24/2004 9:18:39 AM PST
by
Dolphy
To: Steve_Seattle
CBS has been caught with their pants down so many times that they all wear skirts now.
160
posted on
03/24/2004 9:19:09 AM PST
by
slimer
("The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." - Plato)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 781-788 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson