Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
fascinating. Obviously, you have a lot more knowledge in this than I.

I was always under the impression that the 'triggering' material that might deteriorate would / could be something simple, or should I say more readably attainable, like c4 or the like.

Perhaps this is not possible. Which is a relief, I must say.
19 posted on 03/23/2004 12:22:18 PM PST by AgThorn (Go go Bush!! But don't turn your back on America with "immigrant amnesty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: AgThorn
No, two different things. The conventional explosives used are very special. The CCCP had to steal our conventional explosives chemical recipe because theirs weren't handling the radioactive environment very well. And even our conventional explosives don't last that long in that environment.

The trigger, however, is typically a mixture of beryillium and polonium-210...isotopes that decay rapidly due to their short half-lives....which you need short half-lives, of course, because you want to emit lots of neutrons...really, really fast in order to get your BOOM from your chain reaction instead of just nuclear reactor-style heat and radiation.

That being said, it is CERTAIN that the terrorists will set off a dirty bomb at some point. That's basically what any of the old ex-Soviet nukes are going to be by now, at most.

20 posted on 03/23/2004 12:37:10 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson