Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/23/2004 8:17:07 AM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Indy Pendance
Bump.
2 posted on 03/23/2004 8:28:23 AM PST by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
INTREP - How is it that these reporters can take Clarke's book as a faithful report of what happened, not questioning anything? And this in the face of massive evidence to the contrary?
3 posted on 03/23/2004 8:30:39 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
Leon E. Panetta, the former congressman who was budget director and later chief of staff during Mr. Clinton's first term, said senior aides viewed terrorism as just one of many pressing global problems.

"Clinton was aware of the threat and sometimes he would mention it," Mr. Panetta said. But the "big issues" in the president's first term, he said, were "Russia, Eastern bloc, Middle East peace, human rights, rogue nations and then terrorism."

6 posted on 03/23/2004 8:36:35 AM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Two years later, however, terrorism moved to the forefront of the national agenda when a truck bomb tore into the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, killing 168 people.

President Clinton visited Oklahoma City for a memorial service, signaling the political import of the event. "We're going to have to be very, very tough in dealing with this," he declared in an interview.

Mr. Panetta said that plans to reorganize the government's counterterrorismefforts were quickly revived. Senior officials recognized that the United States remained vulnerable to terrorism. The bombing proved to be the work of two Americans, both former soldiers, but if Oklahoma City could be hit, an attack by terrorists of any stripe could "happen at the White House," Mr. Panetta said.

Two months after the bombing, Mr. Clinton ordered the government to intensify the fight against terrorism. The order did not give agencies involved in the fight more money, nor did it end the bureaucratic turf battles among them.

But it did put Mr. bin Laden, who had set up operations in Sudan after leaving Afghanistan in 1991, front and center.

7 posted on 03/23/2004 8:40:04 AM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
.


'Remember the Lost and Suffering on September 11, 2001'

http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=33


.
9 posted on 03/23/2004 8:52:00 AM PST by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
If Presidend Bush would have received this plan on September 10, 2001 as indicated, it was still too late to prevent attacks on September 11, 2001. Clearly the Clinton Administration knew about the threat of terrorism, and basically did nothing. If you take the time to read this entire report, Monica is mentioned several times as a distraction from Clinton's duties as President, and the evidence is damning that Clarke is lying to save the Clinton Adminstration.

Administration officials say the president [Bush] was concerned about the growing threat and frustrated by the halfhearted efforts to thwart Al Qaeda. In July, Ms. Rice said, Mr. Bush likened the response to the Qaeda threat to "swatting at flies." He said he wanted a plan to "bring this guy down."

The [Bush] administration's draft plan for fighting Al Qaeda included a $200 million C.I.A. program that, among other things, would arm the Taliban's enemies. Clinton administration officials had refused to provide significant money and arms to the Northern Alliance, which was composed mostly of ethnic minorities. [Clinton] Officials feared that large-scale support for the rebels would involve the United States too deeply in a civil war and anger Pakistan.

President Bush's national security advisers approved the plan on Sept. 4 [2001], a senior administration official said, and it was to be presented to the president on Sept. 10. (However, the leader of the Northern Alliance was assassinated by Qaeda agents on Sept. 9.) Mr. Bush was traveling on Sept. 10 and did not receive it.

The next day his senior national security aides gathered shortly before 9 a.m. for a staff meeting. At roughly the same moment, a hijacked Boeing 767 was plowing into the north tower of the World Trade Center.


10 posted on 03/23/2004 8:57:43 AM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
Useful facts bump!
11 posted on 03/23/2004 9:07:45 AM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
bump
12 posted on 03/23/2004 9:17:47 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance
Mr. Bush's principals did not formally meet to discuss terrorism in late spring when intercepts from Afghanistan warned that Al Qaeda was planning to attack an American target in late June or perhaps over the July 4 holiday.

Ummmm...this conflicts with info the WH released...

Contrary to Dick Clarke's assertion that he did not brief senior officials until April 30, the first meeting of Deputies was held on March 7, and Dick Clarke briefed the group on al-Qa'ida. Deputies agreed that a National Security Policy Directive on al-Qa'ida should be prepared.

Source

That would have been less than 6 weeks after the inaugural. Sounds like they hit the ground running to me...they barely had the keys to the executive washrooms by then.

14 posted on 03/23/2004 10:03:17 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Indy Pendance; Admin Moderator
Thanks for reposting my original thread...I had forgotten about it but sneakers pinged me.

However, the source is the NY Times and not The Washington Times; admin, please correct that.

15 posted on 03/23/2004 2:21:23 PM PST by Pharmboy (History's greatest agent for freedom: The US Armed Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson