[governsleastgovernsbest]

Again, my sense is that this political dog just won't hunt for the Dems. It's such an obvious set-up. Clarke's trying to sell a book, the Dems are trying to get off the issue of Kerry's weakness on defense, Clarke is an old Clinton admin hand, the Clinton admin's anti-terror record is pathetically weak.

When the Today Show hosts show signs of skepticism about an attack launched on W, you know the Dems are in trouble!

[governsleastgovernsbest]

Today Show ping.

[The Wizard]

one democrat supporting the lies of another democrat....perfect

[mewzilla]

Diogenesis, do you still have that list of terror attacks that took place on Toon's watch? Paging Richard Clarke...

[palmer]

from Feb 2001, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/20010213-1.html
We have no higher priority than the defense of our people against terrorist attack.

[MEG33]

Governs,Condi lowered the boom on Clarke on Fox and Ijaz Monsoor called Clarke a liar without using the word.He was furious at Clarke's "story".

Maybe this won't play except to distraught 911 families,needing someone to pin their loss on...and dems,of course.

[kdot]

When you move into a new house, be sure to rid it of vermin from the previous owner. Clark belonged to Clinton.

[anniegetyourgun]

Agreed - they were probably hoping this story would last all week too. I'm wondering if the Kerry camp was hoping to pre-empt what will undoubtedly be the very ugly reality that the U.N. oil-for-food program will unveil the fact that France, Russia and the U.N. were taking bribes to keep Saddam in place. Makes Kerry's nonsense about needing to "internationalize" (read: get U.N. approval) look like the fools errand that it was. In fact, it makes Kerry and his leftist friends look like dupes.

[ru4liberty]

Clark tried to keep a straight face - and to give him credit, he certainly didn't blink

Which is not unusual for a reptile.

Great write-up. Thanks.

[TomGuy]

There is a pattern. Every few months, a Clintonite comes out of the woodwork with accusations and allegations.

I would bet these are scheduled and planned by the Clinton machine. They serve several purposes:

They try to spin event.
They try to rewrite history.
They try to cast allegations against GWB administration.

Well, sorry, Bill, but your legacy has already been cast in stone. All the spin and attempts to rewrite history just won't work. Too much truth exists. Sorry Bill.

[ex-Texan]

Richard Clarke was and is a Clintonista. He made a sweetheart deal with CBS to give his 'exclusive interview' on 60 Minutes: Viacom also owns the his publisher. He plans to make a career of these fabricated charges. I choose to believe Lieberman over this dorky, over-inflated, Clintonite wing-nut wacko.

[anniebsings]

Yesterday on newsmax.com, it was reported that according to ABC White House correspondent, Terry Moran: one of Richard Clarke's closest friends and colleagues, Rand Beers, is one of the top foreign policy advisors to Sen.Kerry. So much for this being "not political"! Interesting also how Clarke didn't want to discuss Clinton passing a number of chances to get Bin Laden.

[maica]

Again, my sense is that this political dog just won't hunt for the Dems. It's such an obvious setup
***

I agree. When the dems put ol' straight talk Wesley up against Dr Rice, they know they have a loser.

Ann Compton reported live (from the White House) on the 7AM ABC radio news and she flubbed her lines. It is the first time I have ever heard such a thing. She was clearly rattled and most likely it was because what Dr Rice said was so devastating to Clarke's accusations.

[Brandon]

Clarke has ties to the Kerry campaign. Check it out:

Source url: http://www.powerlineblog.com/

Scroll down to the heading, "Richard Clarke, Fraud"

But is Clarke only a bitter ex-bureaucrat, or is there more to his attack on President Bush? Let's consider both Clarke's personal history and his current employment. Clarke now teaches at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government; here is his Kennedy School bio, which notes that the capstone of his career in the State Department was his service as Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs.

Another professor at the Kennedy School is Rand Beers, who is evidently an old friend and colleague of Clarke's, as Beers' Kennedy School bio says that "[d]uring most of his career he served in the State Department's Bureau of Politico-Military Affairs."

So Clarke and Beers, old friends and colleagues, have continued their association at the Kennedy School. Indeed, they even teach a course together. And, by the most astonishing coincidence, their course relates directly to the subject matter of Clarke's attack on the Bush administration: "Post-Cold War Security: Terrorism, Security, and Failed States" is the name of the course. Here is its syllabus:

Between them Rand Beers and Richard Clarke spent over 20 years in the White House on the National Security Council and over 60 years in national security departments and agencies. They helped to shape the transition from Cold War security issues to the challenges of terrorism, international crime, and failed states...Case studies will include Somalia, Haiti, Bosnia, Iraq, Colombia, and Afghanistan. Challenges of counter-terrorism and homeland security will also be addressed.

Why do we find this particularly significant? Because Rand Beers' bio says:

He resigned [his State Department position] in March 2003 and retired in April. He began work on John Kerry's Presidential campaign in May 2003 as National Security/Homeland Security Issue Coordinator.

There you have it: Richard Clarke is a bitter, discredited bureaucrat who was an integral part of the Clinton administration's failed approach to terrorism, was demoted by President Bush, and is now an adjunct to John Kerry's presidential campaign.

Thanks to the indefatigable Dafydd ab Hugh for noting the connections between Clarke and Beers.

[YaYa123]

The American people are going to slice through this BS like warm buttah!

Imus sure did. Clark's book is published by a subsididary (sp) of Simon Schuster, which is owned by Viacom, which owns CBS, who got the 60 Minutes interview. (Dontcha love it when Leslie Stahl makes her eyes get real real big, like she's just heard something shocking?)

And Clark is now an ABC "consultant", and we are supposed to think that's a non-partisan position..DUH. But get this, the Clinton hold-over bastard is a Kerry advisor!

Condi Rice did a great job on all the channels I caught her, but Imus got it just right when he said Clark cared so much about the security of his country that he took the time to write a book, rather than correcting the problem.

By the way, I'm not worried one bit that this bastard will hurt President Bush with his breathless revelations. They are too nasty, too partisan, and over the top....the American people recognize a political hatchet job for political advantage and personal profit when they see one.

And one more thing....I hope this latest outrage is the nail in the coffin of any Republican holding over anyone from previous Demo administrations. Fire em all!

[bushfamfan]

It's great to see Condi reminding people that the Clintoon administration had this guy from the get-go, when the first WTC bombing happened and all the other al Qaeda actions while they openly declared war on the USA, but Bush is supposedly to blame for a mere 7 months and a few weeks. They aren't going to get away with it and it's great Condi and the administration are responding in reminding people of this. People need to be reminded.

[Savage Beast]

Wesley Clark is the dumbest politician since Jimmy Carter.

[TomGuy]

Haag on FoxNews calling 8 years of Clinton, incompetent. lol

[OXENinFLA]

Who published this new Clark book?

[Mo1]

Thanks for another good reporting of the Today Show ..

This happened over on the Fox & Friends show

To: OldFriend
Monsoor Ijaz just cleared up Richard Clark's lies. Richard Clark went to Sandy Burger and blocked the effort to get Osama Bin Laden, AT EVERY STEP. Monsoor will challenge him on any television show or testify anywhere he is asked. Monsoor said that Clark is completely out of control and he will see that Clark is held accountable for the lies he is telling.
57 posted on 03/22/2004 7:28:25 AM EST by kcvl

[rantaway]

unfortunately, folks, Clarke has tons of credibility. worked for both repubs and dems.

i am going to study him further and his history. if anyone has links, i would appreciate them. if this came out of Carville's stained mouth it would be different. i want to take a close look. i hope it isn't true. i'll report back if/when i find anything