Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taiwan President Shot (Update: Wounds not life-threatening)

Posted on 03/18/2004 10:41:33 PM PST by BurbankKarl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-328 last
To: Rams82
If this is Chinese intelligence or military this could mean WW3! Seems like this should be the top story

Maybe the news channels don't have reporters over there? Or, they decided it wasn't more important than other news if the wounds weren't life-threatening, and they didn't want to speculate on the perpetrator?

321 posted on 03/19/2004 11:50:42 AM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: Rams82
It could be, and France is with China!
322 posted on 03/19/2004 11:55:20 AM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: heleny
If it is China and Chen wins, which I'm sure he will now, I believe that there will be talk of independence in Taiwan.
323 posted on 03/19/2004 12:05:20 PM PST by Rams82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
And you better define what you mean by 'successful amphibious' operation. If you accomplish the mission/political objective without even landing a troop or firing a shot, that is successful in my book. The US often accomplishes its objetives by a mere show of force.

I thought it was pretty clear that we were discussing whether PRC had the technical and logistical capability to conquer and seize the island of Taiwan militarily through invasion.

They don't...at all. If you are turning the conversation towards just whether or not the PRC can achieve psycho-political objectives by being scary then thats a different debate. PRC could in fact obliterate Taiwan with non-conventional weaponry if it wanted. But thats not what I was discussing.
324 posted on 03/19/2004 12:25:27 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I believe they would probably try to choke Taiwan with a naval blockade of the island
325 posted on 03/19/2004 12:35:02 PM PST by Rams82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I thought it was pretty clear that we were discussing whether PRC had the technical and logistical capability to conquer and seize the island of Taiwan militarily through invasion.

I still argue that they pose a serious threat, and given that they can blockade TWN, and an island is simply a fortress, that under siege will eventually fall, they are capable of achieving that militarily (without US intervention).

As to changing the argument, I rarely argue things that are irrelevant. A military capability is pointless unless it serves some purpose. Convincing TWN to capitulate with as little fighting as possible is as much a goal of the PRC as getting Iraq to capitulate was to us last spring. What is important is whether they have the persuasive power to influence the TWN govt, and they definitely do. It is the policy of the US to see that they do not use violence as the means of reuniting TWN and PRC.

326 posted on 03/19/2004 12:45:55 PM PST by Magnum44 (Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior force is the ONLY cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
I just came back into the States last night from a trip in China, but from what I have heard in initial reports is that Chen is suspected of staging this as an election stunt. I wouldn't put it past him.
327 posted on 03/22/2004 8:44:14 AM PST by Dr. Marten (Treason...How can such a small word mean so little to so many?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
This election is a mess!
328 posted on 03/22/2004 2:22:41 PM PST by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-328 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson