Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florence man fined $10,000 for machine gun possession
The Tuscaloosa News ^ | rkba, bang, 2a, | AP

Posted on 03/15/2004 3:25:43 PM PST by TERMINATTOR

A federal judge fined a Florence man $10,000 and ordered him to spend nine months in home detention for possessing a World War II-era machine gun.

U.S. District Judge Karen O. Bowdre also put Paul David Connolly, 49, on five year's probation and ordered him to perform 150 hours of community service.

Connolly, who had faced a possible 10-year sentence, had been indicted in April for possessing a Sten machine assembled from a kit. He later pleaded guilty.

Connolly's attorney, Jim Sturdivant, said Connolly possessed the weapon for recreational purposes only and he hoped the sentence imposed by the judge Wednesday will not be appealed.

U.S. Attorney Alice Martin said the sentence would be reviewed and that federal law "clearly prohibits the private possession of a machine gun."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alabama; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2a; bang; banglist; federaljbt; infringment; rkba; sten; stengun; traitors; treason; tyrants
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
Federal law clearly prohibits infringements of the peoples RKBA!

"A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." -- Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

1 posted on 03/15/2004 3:25:45 PM PST by TERMINATTOR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
"U.S. Attorney Alice Martin said the sentence would be reviewed and that federal law "clearly prohibits the private possession of a machine gun."

U.S. Attorney Alice Martin should check her facts.


2 posted on 03/15/2004 3:31:24 PM PST by Redcoat LI ( "help to drive the left one into the insanity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
So, I'm wondering. In most kits that I'm familiar with, the receiver is chopped so that it can't be reassembled into a working machine gun. The BATFE has regulations for how the receiver must be cut. Is that the case here, and the BATFE decided that the man could just use some zip ties on the receiver and get it working again? They have referred to some of the kits as "machine guns", even though the receivers have been chopped, and all you have are a couple of the pieces, with the center piece missing. Scrap metal. But it's a "machine gun". I'm just wondering what the rest of the story is here.
3 posted on 03/15/2004 3:31:56 PM PST by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
In most kits that I'm familiar with, the receiver is chopped so that it can't be reassembled into a working machine gun. The BATFE has regulations for how the receiver must be cut. Is that the case here, and the BATFE decided that the man could just use some zip ties on the receiver and get it working again?

Per the BATF's logic, anything which could conceivably be made into a machine gun is a machine gun. If the BATF buys 500 'deactivated' [cut into pieces] machinegun receivers and manages to find two which it can manage to successfully weld together, then under BATF logic all 500 of the cut-in-half receivers are machineguns.

4 posted on 03/15/2004 3:48:36 PM PST by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI
They don't care about the Federal Government obeying the law, they just want you to blindly go along with whatever "rules" the BATF comes up with. Remember Randy Weaver's wife was murdered because the stock on a shotgun he sold was 3/8" to short for Randy Weaver having not paid a $5 tax!. If he had paid the tax the Feds would not have had a case!

Ravenstar
5 posted on 03/15/2004 3:49:51 PM PST by Ravenstar (Reinstitute the Constitution as the Ultimate Law of the Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ravenstar
stock on a shotgun he sold was 3/8" to short

you mean barrel? shotguns don't require a stock, do they?

6 posted on 03/15/2004 3:52:25 PM PST by glock rocks (molon labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI
If you are a specially licensed dealer and pay a $200 dollar tax for each time you sell a machine gun you can own and fire a fully functional machine gun. This man didn't obtain the license and probably didn't pay the $200 dollar tax so they fine him $10,000 dollars!

Ravenstar
7 posted on 03/15/2004 3:54:46 PM PST by Ravenstar (Reinstitute the Constitution as the Ultimate Law of the Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
A federal judge fined a Florence man $10,000 and ordered him to spend nine months in home detention for possessing a World War II-era machine gun. U.S. District Judge Karen O. Bowdre also put Paul David Connolly, 49, on five year's probation and ordered him to perform 150 hours of community service.

But does he get to keep it?

8 posted on 03/15/2004 3:56:08 PM PST by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravenstar
Remember Randy Weaver's wife was murdered because the stock on a shotgun he sold was 3/8" to short for Randy Weaver having not paid a $5 tax!. If he had paid the tax the Feds would not have had a case!

If the feds had really wanted the $5 they could have collected it with a lot less time an effort than they spend killing his wife.

9 posted on 03/15/2004 3:59:04 PM PST by tacticalogic (Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ravenstar
Remember Randy Weaver's wife was murdered because the stock on a shotgun he sold was 3/8" to short for Randy Weaver having not paid a $5 tax!. If he had paid the tax the Feds would not have had a case!

If the feds had really wanted the $5 they could have collected it with a lot less time an effort than they spend killing his wife.

10 posted on 03/15/2004 3:59:11 PM PST by tacticalogic (Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ravenstar; glock rocks
My understanding with Randy Weaver's case is that the barrel was 1/8 of an inch too short. Is there an overall length that must be followed also? 28 inches or something like that?
11 posted on 03/15/2004 4:13:10 PM PST by B4Ranch (Don't be so open-minded your brains fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: supercat
Per the BATF's logic, anything which could conceivably be made into a machine gun is a machine gun

Yes. If you happen to possess an M-16 part, be it a trigger, bolt carrier, or disconnecter, you technically are in possession of a "machine gun." And you cannot simply install one of these pieces in your legal Ar15 because you happen to have it in your parts box. One part makes the whole gun a "machine gun" according to BATF.

12 posted on 03/15/2004 4:15:07 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: supercat
InterOrdinance is in deep doodoo right now for selling parts kits with the receivers supposedly improperly demilled. Buyers of those kits received a letter from the BATFE informing them that they were in possession of a machine gun subject to confiscation and seizure. So, yes, by their logic, even a couple of pieces of scrap metal can be called a "machine gun".
13 posted on 03/15/2004 4:15:52 PM PST by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ravenstar
Its not just a matter of paying the tax; you must have a Class III Federal license to possess full auto or suppressed weapons - and you can't get one that applies to new guns, because under Reagan, the BATF license issuing unit was de-funded by an act of Congress.
14 posted on 03/15/2004 4:17:27 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
I think I found it.

18USC 924(c)(1)(B)(i), the statute defines a "short-barreled shotgun" as:

a shotgun having one or more barrels less than eighteen inches in length and any weapon made from a shotgun (whether by alteration, modification or otherwise) if such a weapon as modified has an overall length of less than twenty-six inches.

15 posted on 03/15/2004 4:17:50 PM PST by glock rocks (molon labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
They threw the bill of right into a paper shreader along time ago with the help of craft lawyers and politicians.

Now anyone with a gun is an enemy of the state according to this smoking crackpot US Attorney Alice Martin. That really great. Its bad enough that, "we the people" may have to fight Islamist terrorist here on our land in the near future. But we may be crimminal for trying to protect this country as well as our selves. Because of looney US Attorneys like this one.
16 posted on 03/15/2004 4:18:09 PM PST by Warlord David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
BANG
17 posted on 03/15/2004 4:21:24 PM PST by thackney (Life is Fragile, Handle with Prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
Actually this isn't too bad.

Ten years ago Renos Raiders would have just gassed the entire "compound".

18 posted on 03/15/2004 4:22:10 PM PST by TheExperiment_Is_Over
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
I have a Winchester 1300 Ranger with a 18" barrel. IIRC the minimun length is 18".
19 posted on 03/15/2004 4:23:30 PM PST by ol' hoghead (This tag line made with genuine, imitation plastic-accept no substitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Warlord David
Now anyone with a gun is an enemy of the state according to this smoking crackpot US Attorney Alice Martin. That really great. Its bad enough that, "we the people" may have to fight Islamist terrorist here on our land in the near future. But we may be crimminal for trying to protect this country as well as our selves. Because of looney US Attorneys like this one.

Good thing she doesn't work for John Ashcroft. I hear he's very pro-2A.

20 posted on 03/15/2004 4:30:29 PM PST by tacticalogic (Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson