Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Treason of the Spaniards
Adam Yoshida weblog ^ | 14 March 2004 | Adam Teiichi Yoshida

Posted on 03/15/2004 8:26:46 AM PST by Lando Lincoln

What happened in Spain’s election was almost enough to make one feel nostalgic for General Franco (who is, unfortunately, still dead). Whatever other flaws he had (and they were both serious and numerous) at least he’d have made sure that Spain dealt harshly with Islamic terrorists and their allies. There is no inherent legitimacy in democratic decisions. A bad decision remains one even if it is taken in such a fashion. The choice of the Spanish people to, in response to the Madrid bombings, opt for the road of cowardice and of the appeasement of terror is such a decision.

The victory of the Socialists over the Popular Party in the Spanish general election is a victory for the terrorists and, indeed, for all the enemies of civilization. It is hard to understate the significance of what has happened here: al-Qaeda has, with the assistance of its confederates within Spain, defeated one of our staunchest allies in the war and created a template for the defeat of other allies. Every Spaniard who cast a Socialist ballot has blood on their hands. Not only the blood of their own countrymen, whose memory they have spit upon and dishonoured, but also those of their fellow Europeans who are now almost certain to die in follow-on assaults.

Ultimately, in this great fight against the terrorists and their allies, America stands alone. Even our staunchest allies can be removed from this fight not by the arms of our enemies buy by the cowardice and immorality of their own people. The terrorists, it would seem, have found the great Achilles’ heel of the West: the waning will of the people. Even if they were to deploy nuclear weapons, al-Qaeda and its ilk lack the force necessary to openly defeat the West on the battlefield. They can win only by breaking the will of the people, by using the threat of death to force them to submit.

From the point of view of al-Qaeda and other groups the point must seem obvious. In nations where the War on Terrorism is already unpopular, the people are far more likely to blame their own government for any attack than they are to blame the terrorists. This, in my opinion, makes it virtually certain that both Britain and Italy will soon be attacked.

Perhaps Britain is still the county it was in 1940 and it would come through an attack today as splendidly as it did then. But I’m not quite so sure. Frankly I think that the energy of that once-great Island race may have been sapped by generations of socialism and the cancer of moral Leftism. For all the good that Thatcherism did, it seems to have failed to arrest the Europeanization of Britain: a fact which makes it likely that, sooner or later, that nation too will head down the road of European cowardice and defeatism. In the event of a major terrorist attack, such as the one we saw in Madrid, I believe that Prime Minister Blair might be forced to resign. Similarly, the position of the present Italian government would also be seriously endangered by an attack. The moral courage of Europeans has evaporated along with the morality of their societies. Their will to resist has been worn away by decades of socialism, nihilism, pacifism, atheism, and sexual perversion. While they are useful to have along when available, relying upon them to remain solid in the long term would be idiotic.

More than anything else what this demonstrates is the folly of relying upon “allies” to wage the war on terrorism. Any war effort which relied entirely upon a “Coalition” could be shattered by just one bomb followed by one election (or vote in Parliament). A “multilateral” war effort requires the consent of everyone. Instead of tailoring a conflict to meet with the approval of one electorate, it would be necessary to seek it of twenty or so.

There is a certain sentiment out there, and it is the one which triumphed in Spain, that holds that if we leave the terrorists alone, then they will leave us alone. Just give us our Gay Weddings, our MTV, and the rest, some say, and we’ll be happy to leave the Islamist to do as he likes elsewhere. The war, in this view, is the fault of those in the West who have been foolish enough to stand up to our enemies. It treats the Islamist as a force of nature, an unstoppable fact. It is the mentality of defeatism.

This is the sort of mentality which underlies all the arguments against the war. After all, if we were simply to throw up our arms and let the terrorists have their way in the Middle East, what would happen to us? The Islamists would be so busy conquering and subduing people overseas that it would be a very long time. Sure, some hot heads would attack us anyways, but most of the terror-masters would be busy for decades. A few thousand would probably die, but such is something that will simply have to be accepted. This, I believe, is their attitude.

Appeasement merely trades the dangers of today for a greater danger tomorrow. Those who believe that Islamists could be satisfied by, for example, a Spanish withdrawal from Iraq, are utterly deluded. Perhaps in the short-term it might buy some time, but in the long term it merely promises a confrontation between Spain and a rising Islam. Islamist propaganda is often riddled with references to Andalusia and Granada, the lost lands of the Moors in Spain. This isn’t idle chatter. They Islamists really want them back: it’s not on the top of the agenda, but it will be as soon as other, more pressing, items are dispensed with.

Opposition to our war against the terrorists is treason against God and all of the decent and moral humans who have ever lived. It is an egregious insult to our forbearers and, indeed, to our civilization as a whole. Support for the policies of appeasement is a morally criminal act.

By responding to this act with cowardice, many Spaniards have done nothing less than commit treason against Western Civilization as a whole. They are making a Devil’s bargain, one where they’ve traded the lives and security of their children (and those of other Westerner’s children) for a little happiness today. They’d rather go about their everyday lives, lay about, and ignore the gathering storm.

We need to remember this. Our war against the terrorists cannot be won in a single day, but it can be lost in one. If John Kerry were to be elected President this November then the terrorists will have won or, at the very least, set us back a decade or more. A vote for John Kerry is an act of moral cowardice, of unbridled stupidity, of wanton immorality, and, indeed, of treason against all that is good and decent in the world.

Spain has fallen to the terrorists. We cannot let it happen here, no matter the cost.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: adamyoshida; spain; spainbombing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: raloxk
You are mistaken; Michael Ledeen for example says that the natural state of the American people is War. Victor David Hanson says that of the entire West.

David Frum and Richard Perle just wrote a Bigger than Jesus manifesto called "An End to Evil"-- Can you say heaven on Earth utopia?

These people are anti-patriotic lunatics.
21 posted on 03/15/2004 8:52:46 AM PST by JohnGalt (If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied. -- R. Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tiamat
Yes, good point. I read a book called 'The Fall Of Saxon England', forget the author, of how the decadent and weak Saxon kingdoms just groveled before the Danes. Who were sea-going terrorists of the first order.


We think of the old Saxon kings as rowdy and hardy fellows with horns on their heads but actually the royal families became rich and weak and decadent. When the Danes arrived they roamed through England at will, killing, robbing and setting fire to anything that would burn. It went on for a century, I believe.

And all the Saxon kings could do was to rob their own people of all they could get in gold and pay them off. And give them territory. Notably East Anglia.
22 posted on 03/15/2004 8:53:36 AM PST by squarebarb (Let us paws to consider how we are feline fine today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Yoshida is a polemicist - he simplifies to make his point.

He is not to my particular taste - neither are those 'bubble-boy' theoretical libertarians who abjure realpolitik in favor of Utopia.

I've seen a few of those here.
23 posted on 03/15/2004 8:55:29 AM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
So much hate directed at a country in mourning.

It's shameful to have such vile bitterness on FR for the pure purpose of scoring political points.

Sounds like something straight from the Democratic talking points--attacking the speaker instead of addressing what he said. If you have specific objections to anything that Yoshida said, let's hear them.

24 posted on 03/15/2004 8:57:28 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (http://c-pol.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
I'm sorry but all this kind of talk on FR and elsewhere in the last day is a huge turnoff.

Calling an election reslult 'Treason' is terribly misplaced, and smacks of the hysterics that we usually see on the left side of the aisle.

We are a tougher and more resilient breed than our liberal friends, who seem to find a catastrophe in even the most mundane situations.

Yea, things could have gone better in Spain, but realize that the shift was in only a few seats, giving power to the decidedly weaker party vis a vis national defense.

I am certain there are many, many Spainiards who are alarmed because of this development. It's their neck, after all.

Those seeking to blame the media in Spain, or the voters, or whoever, are looking in the wrong place.

Enough folks in Spain - a small number, relatively, changed their vote after the terror attack that killed 200 and injured over 1000. We can speculate as to why they changed their vote - fear could be it, I really don't know.

In any event, from our perspective, it was 'gut check time' and they missed the gut check. That's not to say everyone in the country did. Only that enough of them did to make a difference.

So lets temper the hysterics. I think some folks in Spain made a bad decision. They will pay the price for it, no doubt. We will pay some kind of price for it to, I expect.

This was a bump on the road - anyone who expected to win every battle in the war on terror must have been living in fantasyland.

So come on, folks, toughen up and dig the heels in. We have an election in the USA we need to win. What Spain does short term is something we have to deal with, but its not the end of the cause, not by a longshot.

Anyone thinking it is should go find a new cause - our cause doesn't need people like them!
25 posted on 03/15/2004 8:57:37 AM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb
Exactly.

And there are bunches of tall, blonde, blue-eyed people in Norhtern Ireland and Scotland to prove it, too.
26 posted on 03/15/2004 8:58:10 AM PST by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Spain has fallen to the terrorists. We cannot let it happen here, no matter the cost.

So is Yoshida suggesting that we cancel the election? Set up our own Caudillo? Our strength, and that of Spain, is that for better or worse the people get a say in the way we conduct our business. The people of Spain have decided overwhelmingly that they don't want to see their government following the policies that they are following, so they voted them out of office. If Yoshida doesn't like democracy then maybe he would be happier where he didn't have to put up with it?

27 posted on 03/15/2004 8:58:23 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Jefferson Davis - the first 'selected, not elected' president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
I've seen them as well. They keep claiming empires abroad can coexist with liberty at home. The Welfare-Warfare state needs them to maintain any kind of facade of legitimacy. How else could they pass Amnesty Bills that legalize, you know, actual invaders instead of bogeymen on TV that only scare soccer moms? And how else could they claim to defend the realm by centralizing and disarming its own citizenry?

Silly, really, but we bravely go forward.
28 posted on 03/15/2004 8:58:53 AM PST by JohnGalt (If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied. -- R. Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
.

There is a Danger and after yesterday's Vote in Spain to change horses in the middle of a worldwide War on Terrorism...

...this ain't so crazy after all:


'HILLARY & TERORISM's plan to regain the White House'

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1022571/posts

.

29 posted on 03/15/2004 8:58:58 AM PST by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Never mind...looks like the debate is already well underway.
30 posted on 03/15/2004 8:59:29 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (http://c-pol.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xJones
Missed you on an earlier ping....Sorry.

Lando

31 posted on 03/15/2004 8:59:56 AM PST by Lando Lincoln (GWB in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative; dirtboy
Drats...I meant to address that to Mr. Galt. So sorry. I'll just step back now.
32 posted on 03/15/2004 9:00:59 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (http://c-pol.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The Spanish aren't cowards and traitors.

The writer is a punk for suggesting as much. My guess is that he was lousy at sports as a child and spent a lot of time playing video games and Dungeons and Dragons. He is probably rather girlish and likely his mother was domineering and his father equally effeminate. Without a strong father figure, he replaced that role with a mythological State and considers and slight of the State's propaganda to be a mark on his own family.

Do you want me to keep going or have I made my point?
33 posted on 03/15/2004 9:02:38 AM PST by JohnGalt (If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied. -- R. Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
The whole thing with Spain just makes me sad.

I can't really be angry with what happened in that election. They got hit HARD and are still reeling.

Dissapointed? Yes.

Not angry.

34 posted on 03/15/2004 9:03:15 AM PST by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
You might look into that period. I believe it was about 700 AD. This is when the Saxon king called Ethelred The Unready was ruling.

It is a perfect study in appeasement.
35 posted on 03/15/2004 9:03:58 AM PST by squarebarb (Let us paws to consider how we are feline fine today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb
Thanks, but I meant whether Kipling had any issue contemporary with himself that he was thinking of, e.g., late Victorian period.
36 posted on 03/15/2004 9:05:51 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
You are right, of course. There are and will be numerous setbacks in this WOT. And, it is refreshing to read a "positive" rebuke for a change. So many replies are caustic.

Personally, my concern is that history has always, without fail, shown that appeasement of tyrants and terrorists is a mistake. Yet, the "elites" with their understanding of world nuances that only their intellect can grasp, drive the "useful idiot" class to see matters through the liberal lens. This is what is on display in Spain today. Now, most certainly, more blood will spilled directly due to this capitulation. Fanatical entities can not be reasoned with or negotiated with. They want our annihilation. Period. Despite the motivation, the bad guys have been emboldened.

FReegards

Lando

37 posted on 03/15/2004 9:10:42 AM PST by Lando Lincoln (GWB in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Because of how Spain voted, the terrorists will leave them alone. They will be back though.....5, 10, 20 years from now. They'll be back to thank those spineless socialist nations that let them grow in strength. They'll return to express their appreciation...in their own special "Religion of Peace" way.
38 posted on 03/15/2004 9:11:10 AM PST by Archie Bunker on steroids (When the going gets tough, liberals quit......thats why they can't lead us post 9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Another perspective is that tyranny abroad is incompatible with liberty at home, in the long run.

We cannot place the existence and rights of states over that of human beings, imo.

That is what the UN is up to; surely that is not the agenda of freedom-loving people.
39 posted on 03/15/2004 9:13:13 AM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
Spot on, sir !
40 posted on 03/15/2004 9:13:52 AM PST by Atlantic Friend (Cursum Perficio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson