But I lost it with the embassy takeover. There was absolutely no upside for him that I can imagine to support that. As to allowing the Shaw to fall, I agree he allowed it to happen and probably was glad. Not out of any geopolitical interests, but he simply hated the Shaw because of his own moral smugness which prevented him from seeing the greater national interest in supporting the Shaw.
Jimmy Carter is above all, a self-rightous jerk.
Book: Carter, Democrats Asked Soviets to Stop Reagan, Sway U.S. Elections.
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
He had some pretty sleazy people in his Administration as I recall. Maybe one or more misrepresented the "demand" as coming from Carter.
OTOH, Carter was and continues to be completely oblivious to the results of his proven incompetence.
Maybe he thought he was doing it for the "good of the people".
In any case, he did go to the Soviet Union in hopes of getting help to defeat Reagan.
I find this to be unbelievable. The students in the street in Iran didn't differentiate between Carter and Reagan, they thought all of America was The Great Satan and wanted revenge for the CIA's assistance in overthrowing Mossadeh back in the 1950s.
There was speculation in some Iranian quarters as well as in some US minds at the time and later that Carters actions were the result of either close ties to, or empathy for, the Soviet Union, which was anxious to break out of the longstanding US-led strategic containment of the USSR, which had prevented the Soviets from reaching the warm waters of the Indian Ocean.
Carters mistaken assessment of Khomeini was encouraged by advisors with a desire to form an Islamic green belt to contain atheist Soviet expansion with the religious fervor of Islam. Eventually all 30 of the scenarios on Iran presented to Carter by his intelligence agencies proved wrong, and totally misjudged Khomeini as a person and as a political entity.
So which is it ?
Carter in sympathy with the USSR, of Carter wanting an "Islamic Belt" to encircle the atheistic Communists ?
This is the message that the "leakers" of this strange attempt at putting a spin on those events of 1979 are really about:
In 1978 while the West was deciding to remove His Majesty Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi from the throne, Shariatmadari was telling anyone who would listen not to allow Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and his velayat faghih (Islamic jurist) version of Islam to be allowed to govern Iran. Ayatollah Shariatmadari noted: We mullahs will behave like bickering whores in a brothel if we come to power ... and we have no experience on how to run a modern nation so we will destroy Iran and lose all that has been achieved at such great cost and effort.
Today, Iranian-born, Grand Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani, the dominant Shia leader in Iraq faces Shariatmadaris dilemma and shares the same quietist Islamic philosophy of sharia (religious law) guidance rather than direct governing by the clerics themselves. Sistanis Khomeini equivalent, militant Ayatollah Mohammed Baqir al-Sadr, was gunned down in 1999 by then-Iraqi Pres. Saddam Husseins forces. Sadrs son, 30-year-old Muqtada al-Sadr, lacks enough followers or religious seniority/clout to immediately oppose Sistani but has a hard core of violent followers biding their time.
This is coming from Sistani's camp. It's their attempt at lobbying.
I agree with Andy, I thought Carter was a terrible president, but one thing that I am sure of, is that he was not motivated by money, nor were his backers. They were silly people, but they weren't mendacious.
Under Carter, judicial nominees were asked point-blank: How will you rule on abortion? What do you think of Roe v. Wade? Carter was the first really aggressive baby-killer in the White House. He appointed Sarah Weddington of Roe fame to the Office of Public Liaison. Anne O'Donnell, president of Right-to-Life of Missouri during the Carter years, told me years ago that she wrote a letter to Weddington each and every month of the Carter presidency, asking for a meeting of pro-life leaders with Carter. Weddington never answered a single letter.
I have no trouble believing that a pharisaical, pseudo-Christian, crypto-Communist Tartuffe like Carter would be above pushing a little kickback scheme for his Georgia friends.
Carter is a moral abortion of a human being.