Skip to comments.
Brinkley: Kerry Faces Questions about Senate Hit Plot
NewsMax ^
| March 14, 2004
| Steve Malzberg
Posted on 03/15/2004 6:07:37 AM PST by Gypssy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: Gypssy
Once put to a vote, the death plot went down to defeat, with Kerry voting in the majority, according to the two witnesses who say he was there. This is oddly worded... enough so that the tin-foil types could say that Kerry conceivably could have voted for the assassination, but that the measure fell short of some kind of super-majority vote. This clearly contratsts with other reports that specifically say that Kerry voted against the assassination.
41
posted on
03/15/2004 8:56:47 AM PST
by
kevkrom
(The John Kerry Songbook: www.imakrom.com/kerrysongs)
To: raloxk
no it is a fact. I also bet the majority of the voters think the same thing. This is a dead-end issue. I cant believe you dont see that. A "fact" is something that can be proven true. What you are offering is called an "opinion."
You don't speak for "the majority of voters," and you have no idea what they might think when presented with evidence that John Kerry was involved in discussions about murdering Senators. I'll give you *my* opinion, though -- they aren't going to like it much.
But let's talk about you. Why do you consider it so important to discourage people from discussing this particular issue?
To: raloxk
you moron Oh, dear!
You really are in a dither, aren't you!
And can the "trumpet" bit. We're discussing, not "trumpeting".
To: veronica
The Dems were desperate for anybody but Dean to win the nomination - so they turned to Kerry, but didn't check him out enough...
44
posted on
03/15/2004 9:00:08 AM PST
by
hchutch
(Why did the Nazgul bother running from Arwen's flash flood? They only managed to die tired.)
To: Interesting Times
"Why do you consider it so important to discourage people from discussing this particular issue?"
because it wont work to convince voters Kerry isnt fit to serve. People arent go to believe that a candidate for President is treasonist.
I do know the majority of votesr arent listening to the loony left and didnt listen to all the paranoid accusations the right threw out against Clinton in 1990s.
Aside from hate, why in the world do think this would work?
45
posted on
03/15/2004 9:00:21 AM PST
by
raloxk
To: raloxk; All
Aside from hateHere we go. Discussing this makes one a "Kerry Hater".
Say, raloxk, what do you think of the really trumped up AWOL (shorthand for all stories covering and questioning his Air National Guard service) business that GWB has to endure. There was even an outrageous news article in a Spokane paper yesterday that was base speculation.
Why don't you run over to that thread and voice your umbrage about "Bush haters" pushing that kind of made up garbage.
To: Judith Anne
I agree with you that it's not loony, but I disagree with your belief that it's treason. It's Sedition, and there are specific laws to deal with the failure to report such a plot.
Hiring one of the witnesses to work on the campaign might have been an attempt to bribe him. If so, it didn't work.
Of course, we could find out that these guys change their story once the bright lights get turned on them. We'll see.
To: raloxk
You're an American in Australia who thinks the Chinese flag is kewl and is hopeful the right crumbles. Is that you, Kerry?
To: raloxk
Aside from hate, why in the world do think this would work? I don't care if it works.
I care if it's true.
To: cyncooper
I think the AWOL charge was bogus. You are making the mistake of thinking that because I oppose brining this charge against Kerry out, that I must be a Kerry supporter
50
posted on
03/15/2004 9:06:12 AM PST
by
raloxk
To: onyx; raloxk
He has the Chinese flag on his profile page, yet claims to be an Aussie? Might be true, but why the Chinese flag? Care to explain, raloxk?
51
posted on
03/15/2004 9:06:16 AM PST
by
Carolinamom
(Currently re-programming my thinking to positive mode.)
To: raloxk
This charge,even if true, is so outlandish, the public will never buy it. Seems that conservatives are willing to embrace loony theories about Kerry just as the left embraces loony theories about Bush. Yeah, the Botox Scandal is such a bigger issue.[/sarcasm]
BTW, what's up with the Chinese flag on your personal page?
To: blake6900
How about Kerry's voting record
53
posted on
03/15/2004 9:07:51 AM PST
by
raloxk
To: raloxk
Are you an American citizen? Just curious.
To: savedbygrace
yes
55
posted on
03/15/2004 9:08:31 AM PST
by
raloxk
To: raloxk; cyncooper
"you moron"
Is that how you're used to talking on FR?
|
56
posted on
03/15/2004 9:13:32 AM PST
by
Sabertooth
(Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
To: raloxk
OK then.
This is not a loony story. It's apparently well sourced, it's gotten air on Fox News Channel, and there are three witnesses.
The story is not that Kerry voted on the thing, but that he didn't report the plot to authorities.
You might be thinking that the original assassination plot was a loony idea, and you'd be right. But the issue of Kerry's involvement, and the fact that he kept it secret from the FBI, is the story, and that's far from loony.
To: savedbygrace
one week from now, this will be a dead story
58
posted on
03/15/2004 9:23:35 AM PST
by
raloxk
To: raloxk
We'll see, won't we?
To: raloxk
I wasn't saying Conversatives should bring this up as an issue. I was just curious for my own knowledge.
60
posted on
03/15/2004 9:39:32 AM PST
by
Gypssy
(Libs Make Me Laugh!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson