Well, they left out Behe. And Johnson. And clowns like Hovind. I see there's nothing by Gould. At least Darwin made the list. But they also included:
Denton, Michael. Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. Bethesda: Adler and Adler, 1986.And I don't like the emphasis on the micro-macro issue, which is a non-issue.
How so? It seems to me a good many folks jump from one to the other while interpreting and exlaining the evidence. Don't they need to be "set straight?"