[ElizabethP]

Creationists assume "intelligent design" was the causative event because the evidence is visible even to the naked eye of a two-year-old.

What is the evidence outside of the the tendency of creationists to marvel at the world and simply tell themselves, "God must have done this."

for without a maker there can be no discoverer nor anything TO discover.

How do you arrive at this conclusion? This is belief rooted only in religious dogma.

[Junior]

Welcome aboard.

[Elsie]

This is belief rooted only in religious dogma.

As opposed to.....

....belief rooted only in ANTI-religious dogma.

[PatrickHenry]

I think I love you.

[Elsie]

What is the evidence outside of the the tendency of creationists to marvel at the world and simply tell themselves,

    "God must have done this."

 

As opposed to the tendency of Evolutionists to gaze at the world and simply tell themselves,

    "Chance must have done this."

[Fester Chugabrew]

What is the evidence outside of the the tendency of creationists to marvel at the world and simply tell themselves, "God must have done this."

The existence of consciousness, intelligence, and design coupled with the inability to replicate the amount of the same present in the observed universe. Isn't that enough?

How do you arrive at this conclusion? This is belief rooted only in religious dogma.

Hogwash. It it a common fact available to common sense apart from any religious dogma at all.