Skip to comments.
McJobs mistake / Sorry, but burger flipping isn't manufacturing
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ^
| Saturday, March 13, 2004
| Editorial
Posted on 03/13/2004 10:02:29 AM PST by Willie Green
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:35:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Since George W. Bush became president the economy has lost 2.8 million factory jobs, but his administration is floating an idea that could dramatically boost manufacturing jobs overnight. It sounds too good to be true. And it is.
The presidential proposition wouldn't actually create any new jobs but would reclassify them and thereby swell job statistics in a declining sector of the economy. Poof! Problem solved.
(Excerpt) Read more at post-gazette.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: globalism; mcjobs; thebusheconomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Willie Green
To: Willie Green
The presidential proposition . . .Those editors sure are good with them words [sic].
3
posted on
03/13/2004 10:05:54 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Willie Green
All jobs are service jobs. Employees provide a service to their employers, which has a market value. Judging jobs by the nature of their output is a marxist concept.
4
posted on
03/13/2004 10:08:37 AM PST
by
Moonman62
To: Willie Green
I heard this the other day on John and Ken. Willie, if we only knew the truth of it, I'll bet this tactic has been used broadly in the last ten years. There's simply no way the manufacturing numbers are not being misrepresented. They actually show an increase in numbers. If anyone is buying that, I've got some great Florida bottom-land I'd love to move.
To: Moonman62
So watching economic sectors (job existance) is now Marxist? Thanks for the humor.
To: Willie Green; A. Pole; B4Ranch; Sabertooth; JackelopeBreeder; dennisw; Spiff
"Since George W. Bush became president the economy has lost 2.8 million factory jobs, but his administration is floating an idea that could dramatically boost manufacturing jobs overnight. It sounds too good to be true. And it is."
There's that word again - JOBS.
7
posted on
03/13/2004 10:11:45 AM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: DoughtyOne
There's simply no way the manufacturing numbers are not being misrepresented. They actually show an increase in numbers. If anyone is buying that, I've got some great Florida bottom-land I'd love to move.
Statements of conjecture without evidence or numbers are misrepresentations, too.
'They actually show an increase in number.' Your link to that substantiate that is where?
9
posted on
03/13/2004 10:13:41 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Willie Green
I will always remember Bush saying on "Cinco de Mayo" that he only wants "gooderer" service jobs in America .....
10
posted on
03/13/2004 10:15:14 AM PST
by
Yasotay
To: Moonman62
Those "burger flippers" require manufactured products in order to do their jobs, from spatulas to ketchup, ice cream cones to paper bags. Their jobs are only one tiny part of the total economic and employment picture that is the so-called "service" industry. Every McDonald's is furnished with carpet, chairs, tables, flooring, lighting, etc., largely manufactured in the USA, installed by American skilled workers, regularly cleaned and maintained using US-manufactured products, e.g., vacuum cleaners, mops, soaps, etc. I find it curious that the poor ol' burger flipper's job is so maligned and its importance to the "big picture" so discounted.
To: TomGuy
Heh heh heh, nice try Tom. I don't have to provide links to make a comment on this forum and welcome you thinking I'm not accurate if you like. Thanks for playing.
To: Willie Green
I had a poster (from Modern Material Handling or Production Magazine, I think) about twenty-five years ago on my wall at work that showed a Big Mac and asked "Is this the future of American manufacturing?" I don't know what I did with it and wish I could find it.
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: DoughtyOne
You can watch all you want. As to whether burger flippers are manufacturers makes no difference whatsoever in a market economy. Drawing attention to the issue by GWB is a big political mistake that is sure to draw the ire of the hammer and sickle crowd.
To: DoughtyOne
I don't have to provide links to make a comment on this forum and welcome you thinking I'm not accurate if you like.
Are you sure you aren't John Kerry, lurking?????
16
posted on
03/13/2004 10:24:14 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Willie Green
"When a fast-food restaurant sells a hamburger, for example," the report asks, "is it providing a 'service' or is it combining inputs to 'manufacture a product?' "Actually, when you put it that way, it sort of makes sense. And in a world where a jar of urine with a crucifix floating in it is classified as art, why shouldn't we classify fast food as manufacturing?
17
posted on
03/13/2004 10:25:31 AM PST
by
irv
To: Willie Green
and yet the unemployment rate remains 5.6%
18
posted on
03/13/2004 10:25:44 AM PST
by
petercooper
(Florida 2000: Bush 2,912,790 - Gore 2,912,253)
To: Willie Green
I've heard all about these burger-flipping jobs. Here's my question, though: Doesn't somebody have to buy the burger? Who are the burger-flippers selling burgers to -- other burger-flippers?
19
posted on
03/13/2004 10:27:45 AM PST
by
Tricorn
To: TomGuy
Did you think you first post didn't convey your message well enough? It must be sad to be so unsure of yourself.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson