To: JustPiper
here you go
looks like on of the planes hitting one of the wtc buildings to me
3,005 posted on
03/22/2004 7:27:45 PM PST by
knak
To: knak
on of the planes = one of the planes, I meant to say
3,006 posted on
03/22/2004 7:29:17 PM PST by
knak
To: knak; All
Storm Warnings
Bin Laden was a threat, but Clinton never pushed it and Bush seemed more interested in Saddam. What went wrong
By Michael Isikoff and Evan Thomas
NewsweekMarch 29 issue - It was the day after 9/11, and President Bush, like many Americans, was looking for someone to bomb. Wandering into the White House Situation Room, the president pulled aside Richard Clarke, the counterterrorism chief of the national-security staff who had been held over from the Clinton years. According to Clarke, Bush asked: was Iraq responsible for the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington? Bush wanted the FBI and CIA to hunt for any evidence that pointed to Iraqi strongman Saddam Hussein. Clarke recalls that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was also looking for a justification to bomb Iraq. Soon after the 9/11 attacks, Rumsfeld was arguing at a cabinet meeting that Afghanistan, home of Osama bin Laden's terrorist camps, did not offer "enough good targets." "We should do Iraq," Rumsfeld urged.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4571338/
3,048 posted on
03/22/2004 8:20:56 PM PST by
JustPiper
(Part of being sane is being a little bit crazy)
To: knak; StillProud2BeFree
Still Proud, can you tell what the writing is in this image? Thanks much
post #3005
3,075 posted on
03/22/2004 9:09:09 PM PST by
Oorang
(The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it)
To: knak; JohnathanRGalt; All
3,109 posted on
03/22/2004 10:49:56 PM PST by
Cindy
To: knak
See, I thought it was a singular building standing, a new attack
3,176 posted on
03/23/2004 10:57:56 AM PST by
JustPiper
(Part of being sane is being a little bit crazy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson