Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Why stop with 14-year-olds?
OC Register ^ | 3/12/04 | Richard Kirk

Posted on 03/12/2004 9:00:16 AM PST by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/14/2004 10:06:55 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

State Sen. John Vasconcellos, D-Santa Clara, is at it again. The same dude who, over a decade ago, established that immensely productive state task force on self-esteem, has recently joined with a group of like-minded legislators to propose giving partial votes to teen-agers. He would give 14- and 15-year-olds quarter-votes. Their 16- and 17-year-old siblings would get half-votes.


(Excerpt) Read more at 2.ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 14yearolds; calgov2002; teenvote; vasconcellos; whystop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
byline on op piece

If ignorant illiterates can vote (and elect Sen. Vasconcellos), toddlers deserve say

1 posted on 03/12/2004 9:00:17 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *calgov2002; california
.
2 posted on 03/12/2004 9:03:33 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ... Support Our Troops! ... Thrash the demRats in November!!! ... Beat BoXer!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: NormsRevenge
What about my cat? How long will he be forced to live with an inferior status, while even seeing his childish tormentors elevated?
4 posted on 03/12/2004 9:11:42 AM PST by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
He would give 14- and 15-year-olds quarter-votes. Their 16- and 17-year-old siblings would get half-votes.

Lets carry this a step further. 18-30 year olds get 1 vote. 30-50 year olds get 1.5 votes. 50-65 year olds get 2 votes. 65-70 year olds get 1.5 votes. 70-75 year olds get one vote. 75-80 year olds get half-vote. 80-85 a quarter. Over 85 no vote.

5 posted on 03/12/2004 9:11:59 AM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Can the adults get any more childish?
6 posted on 03/12/2004 9:13:05 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
My cats would like to vote. They're pulling for government subsidized catnip.
7 posted on 03/12/2004 9:14:28 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (You need tons click "co-ordinating")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Vasconcellos is an idiot.
8 posted on 03/12/2004 9:14:46 AM PST by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
I like the way your scale works out. But I would like to propose an amendment - 65-75 year olds who live in southern Florida get no votes.
9 posted on 03/12/2004 9:16:28 AM PST by BSunday (Too stupid to vote - Now THAT's impressive !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Actually, I'd trust my 8 year old to vote better (read: more informed) than most adults. But that's just me and many parents on FR.
10 posted on 03/12/2004 9:17:08 AM PST by eyespysomething (I think animal testing is a terrible idea; they get all nervous and give the wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
Lets carry this a step further. 18-30 year olds get 1 vote. 30-50 year olds get 1.5 votes. 50-65 year olds get 2 votes. 65-70 year olds get 1.5 votes. 70-75 year olds get one vote. 75-80 year olds get half-vote. 80-85 a quarter. Over 85 no vote.

And the graveyard gets 25 votes per grave.

11 posted on 03/12/2004 9:24:17 AM PST by lowbridge (I can think of a punishment worse than death for Saddam, but Hillary is already married.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
What about my cat?

You can marry your cat in San Francisco.

12 posted on 03/12/2004 9:25:52 AM PST by lowbridge (I can think of a punishment worse than death for Saddam, but Hillary is already married.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Wee wunt 2 vote. Us ate yir olds no a lot. Wee no minny thengs. Jus bekawse i em a ate yir old kat dont meen i dont no how much kat chow costs.
13 posted on 03/12/2004 9:37:02 AM PST by squarebarb (Ich bin eine Click Freepern)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
How about the old, "No taxation without representation" thing. Citizens of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico cannot vote in national elections because they do not pay Federal Income Tax. They vote in local elections because they do pay local income taxes.

So when the 14 to 17 year olds start filing tax forms by April 15th every year, then they can vote.

I know that most kids in this age group don't make enough to have to pay any taxes, but the "bother" of having to file would be enough to make most of them stay home. I would also think that having to deduct Federal, State, and Local taxes from what little they may over a summer, would be a sure way to turn quite a few liberals into conservatives.

Best Regards

Sergio
14 posted on 03/12/2004 9:51:12 AM PST by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I have a feeling that lowering the age of sexual consent is not far behind. These are predatory adults with a hidden agenda IMHO.
15 posted on 03/12/2004 10:00:04 AM PST by tkathy (Our economy, our investments, and our jobs DEPEND on powerful national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
And, as pointed out elsewhere, the newly enfranchised children can later sue for full votes. After all, they're not 1/4 or 1/2 persons, just as former slaves weren't really 3/5 persons.
16 posted on 03/12/2004 10:49:07 AM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

If the well-educated voters of Santa Clara can elect, time and again, a representative as frivolous and intellectually benighted as John Vasconcellos, how could incontinent 2-year-olds do worse?

Why stop at 2-year-olds? How about newborn babies, or, better yet, what about the rights of the unborn children?

17 posted on 03/12/2004 10:51:14 AM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
I have a feeling that lowering the age of sexual consent is not far behind. These are predatory adults with a hidden agenda IMHO.

Bingo! If you can vote, you can ...

18 posted on 03/12/2004 10:59:21 AM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
What percentage of young people in California are not Latino...Maybe he isn't such an idiot after all.
19 posted on 03/12/2004 11:07:10 AM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I still say this is about working towards lowering the age of sexual consent. If you can vote at 14 you can consent to sex.

sick
20 posted on 03/12/2004 12:15:35 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson