Skip to comments.
U.S. Tax Code Provisions Encourage Offshore Jobs
The Wall Street Journal ^
| 03/12/2004
| STEVE LIESMAN
Posted on 03/12/2004 7:17:50 AM PST by neutrino
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:51:16 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
As if U.S. workers didn't have enough going against them. Turns out there really are provisions in the tax code that seem to encourage sending jobs offshore.
I have to admit not believing the claim when I first heard Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry shout about it. So I thought either Mr. Kerry has trumped this thing up -- in which case there's a good story -- or there's one very wacky part to the tax code -- in which case, there's a better story.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jobs; offshore; offshoring; outsourcing; tax; taxcode; taxes; taxreform; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: neutrino
From another angle. Where is the proof that a tax free, low wage paying American corporation also reduces prices to consumers accordingly?
21
posted on
03/18/2004 11:02:02 AM PST
by
lewislynn
(Free traders know it isn't , they just believe cheap popcorn makers raises their living standards.)
To: ninenot
I wouldn't dispute the point, but the article gives no indication...
22
posted on
03/18/2004 1:05:09 PM PST
by
neutrino
(Oderint dum metuant: Let them hate us, so long as they fear us.)
To: neutrino
BTTT
23
posted on
03/18/2004 1:11:37 PM PST
by
citizen
(Write-in Tom Tancredo President 2004!)
To: ninenot
"Just a wild guess: was it Carnegie or Rockefeller who inserted this provision?"
I sure couldn't tell you. Back then, in the 19-teens, it's perhaps more likely that someone from Dole (Bananas) who had extensive plantations in S. America lobbied for such a provision; if indeed the provision was lobbied for in the first place. As far as I recall, both Carnegie and Rockefeller & their conglomerates (steel & oil) were pretty much domestically-based.
Such provisions IMO actually make a fair amount of sense. It's just that when internet-enabled corporate America runs amok with them, we have the results we have now.
To: lewislynn
You're right, prices don't decline. But I'll tell you something that disturbs me more than that...supposedly, all of this global shifting helps earnings somewhere, somehow, right? But if so, where are they? I don't see many companies that are making really big gains in profits, despite offshoring.
25
posted on
03/18/2004 1:20:53 PM PST
by
neutrino
(Oderint dum metuant: Let them hate us, so long as they fear us.)
To: lewislynn
Nike is a great example of low-labor-cost/no-tax-cost companies which charge as little as possible...</sarcasm>
26
posted on
03/18/2004 1:32:25 PM PST
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Ahhhh...WHY do such provisions make sense?
27
posted on
03/18/2004 1:33:49 PM PST
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: Hop A Long Cassidy
Eliminate domestic corporate income tax; VAT on all imports. Ban union membership by government employees (thereby opening the door to true performance and productivity management not to mention increased automation and RIF). Put the knife to every government program except for defense and the interstate highway system. Problem solved.
28
posted on
03/18/2004 1:36:14 PM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
To: ninenot; clamper1797; sarcasm; BrooklynGOP; A. Pole; Zorrito; GiovannaNicoletta; Caipirabob; ...
Ping
29
posted on
03/18/2004 2:10:35 PM PST
by
harpseal
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: harpseal; ninenot
OPIC and other types of foreign aid WE already knew about. THIS tax incentive, THE GOP and CEOs have ALWAYS known about, but declined to share that information with US. Now WE know TOO. And little good it will do. Notice how the pace of offshoring has slowed down to a trickle? As have the layoffs? New unemployment claims have dropped. Bush hailing the boomer economy.
Just wait until GWB is back in the White House come January. You'll see an offshoring stampede that will expose everything that's gone up to now as just a warm up.
30
posted on
03/18/2004 3:01:48 PM PST
by
Euro-American Scum
(A poverty-stricken middle class must be a disarmed middle class)
To: Euro-American Scum
There will also be a run on ammo if that happens.
Hint: lay low. It won't be pretty out there.
31
posted on
03/18/2004 3:17:57 PM PST
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: neutrino; gcruse
Notice that the tax code encourages taking away American jobs. Can we at least agree to end this insanity?Absolutely. But instead, what I hear from your side of the aisle is "raise taxes some more."
32
posted on
03/18/2004 3:19:58 PM PST
by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: neutrino
Yes, we can agree. Thank God for John Linder.
www.fairtax.org
Call your senators and your rep, tell them it's time for a national consumption tax. End the income tax, end withholdings shut down the IRS and SET US FREE.
To: ninenot
There will also be a run on ammo if that happens. Hint: lay low. It won't be pretty out there. I'm way ahead of you on this. -:)
34
posted on
03/18/2004 3:27:20 PM PST
by
Euro-American Scum
(A poverty-stricken middle class must be a disarmed middle class)
To: Poohbah
The fix to this problem already exists. U.S. Rep. John Linder, R-Ga., is proposing a national sales tax that would end all "corporate loopholes" all income tax and all of it.
I'm only supporting candidates (like Herman Cain who's running for Zell Miller's senate seat in Georgia) who support Linder.
http://www.fairtax.org
To: ninenot
Like anything else, it's a matter of whether you are the "victim" or the beneficiary, just like if we go to a baseball game and if you like the Yanks and I like the Red Sox and the Sox lose, for me it was a cruddy game and for you it was a good game.
For companies able to offshore their labor, their labor and tax costs decline, the pursuit of which is their right under capitalism. For them it makes sense. The folks who put these ideas together are typically members of an elite class interesting in preserving both their positions and the appearance of their usefulness. They are not very interested in the welfare of the average worker. For them it makes sense.
I may have posted it earlier, but there is bill being talked about in Congress which would allow a one-time tax amnesty for repatriating foreign-earned profits. That would be a 1K point DJIA popper.
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
It may be a "right" under capitalism, but that fact alone demonstrates why the USA has some restrictions on 'capitalism.' The moral rectitude is another question entirely.
Of course, these folks also expect that the US's civil and military apparatus will defend their property rights...
37
posted on
03/18/2004 6:36:15 PM PST
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: neutrino
Would you like FRies with that?
38
posted on
03/18/2004 6:45:38 PM PST
by
Ed_in_NJ
To: neutrino
As the biggest and best economy in the world, the U.S. is a price maker. We set the standard. A U.S. tax cut might only ignite an international game of tax chicken where all the Lowtaxistans cut their rates below our new, lower rate.
Sounds like a plan, let's do it.
39
posted on
03/18/2004 6:53:14 PM PST
by
sixmil
To: Ed_in_NJ
btt
40
posted on
03/18/2004 7:04:19 PM PST
by
Ciexyz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson